University of La Rioja (Spain).
Psicothema. 2021 Feb;33(1):16-27. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.285.
Empirical evidence suggests that schizotypy is a useful construct for analyzing and understanding psychotic disorders. However, several issues remain to be resolved.
This selective, critical review, addresses some questions and limitations, and discusses future directions of work.
First, we present a conceptual outline and discuss the evidence from translational and interdisciplinary studies on schizotypy. Next, we examine and discuss newer analytical and methodological approaches, including network and machine learning approaches. We also discuss newer psychometric identification approaches, such as those using biobehavioral and ambulatory assessment. Next, we review recent cross-cultural studies in schizotypy research. Finally, we identify new challenges and directions and draw conclusions.
This selective, critical review suggests that new methods can contribute to the construction of a solid scientific model of schizotypy as a risk construct.
实证证据表明，精神分裂症特质是分析和理解精神病障碍的有用构建。然而，仍有一些问题需要解决。
本选择性、批判性回顾旨在探讨一些问题和局限性，并讨论未来的工作方向。
首先，我们提出了一个概念框架，并讨论了精神分裂症特质的转化和跨学科研究的证据。其次，我们考察和讨论了更新的分析和方法学方法，包括网络和机器学习方法。我们还讨论了更新的心理计量识别方法，例如使用生物行为和动态评估的方法。接下来，我们回顾了精神分裂症特质研究中的跨文化研究。最后，我们确定了新的挑战和方向并得出结论。
本选择性、批判性回顾表明，新方法可以为构建精神分裂症特质作为风险构建的坚实科学模型做出贡献。
