• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

补充个人口头辩护对团队为基础的学习治疗学课程中的信心、参与度和表现的影响。

Impact of supplemental individual verbal defense on confidence, engagement, and performance in a team-based learning therapeutics course.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, 6550 Sanger Road, Suite 420G, Orlando, FL 32827, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL 32827, United States.

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, 580 W. 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209, United States.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Feb;13(2):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.010
PMID:33454072
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Team-based learning (TBL) has been successfully applied to multiple healthcare education disciplines. A primary tenet of TBL is the development of solutions leveraging the collective knowledge of a team rather than the individual competency of any one student. In an effort to enhance individual student accountability, an individual verbal defense (IVD) format was implemented in a multi-campus TBL-based pharmacotherapeutics course. The study sought to investigate the use of TBL-IVD embedded within a traditional TBL format on student engagement, teaching style preferences, and exam performance compared to a TBL-only format.

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING

In this cross-sectional study, second-year pharmacy students enrolled in a pharmacotherapeutics course during fall 2019 completed an 11-item survey. The survey was designed to assess TBL-IVD on student engagement and teaching style preference. Free-response qualitative feedback was solicited to assess positive-negative themes related to the activity. Aggregate exam performance for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) related content was compared to historical exam data to assess the impact on student performance.

FINDINGS

The majority of students (72%, n = 54) preferred the TBL-IVD compared to a TBL-only format. Students reported higher engagement with TBL-IVD (84%, n = 63). Correct exam responses for CAP related content were higher in the TBL-IVD group (67% vs. 55%, P < .001). Positive themes included an increased opportunity to defend recommendations verbally and increased interaction with an on-campus faculty member.

SUMMARY

The study demonstrates the addition of IVD can enhance student perceptions, confidence, and performance within a large, multi-campus, TBL-based pharmacotherapeutics course.

摘要

背景与目的

团队学习(TBL)已成功应用于多个医疗保健教育学科。TBL 的一个主要原则是利用团队的集体知识来开发解决方案,而不是依赖任何一个学生的个人能力。为了增强学生的个人责任感,在一个多校区基于 TBL 的药物治疗学课程中采用了个人口头辩护(IVD)形式。本研究旨在调查在传统 TBL 格式中嵌入 TBL-IVD 与仅 TBL 格式相比,对学生参与度、教学风格偏好和考试成绩的影响。

教育活动和环境

在这项横断面研究中,2019 年秋季入读药物治疗学课程的二年级药学学生完成了一项 11 项的调查。该调查旨在评估 TBL-IVD 对学生参与度和教学风格偏好的影响。还征求了自由回答的定性反馈,以评估与该活动相关的积极和消极主题。将社区获得性肺炎(CAP)相关内容的综合考试成绩与历史考试数据进行比较,以评估对学生表现的影响。

发现

大多数学生(72%,n=54)更喜欢 TBL-IVD 而不是仅 TBL 格式。学生报告说 TBL-IVD 的参与度更高(84%,n=63)。在 TBL-IVD 组中,与 CAP 相关内容相关的正确考试答案更高(67%比 55%,P<0.001)。积极的主题包括增加了口头辩护建议的机会和增加了与校内教职员工的互动。

总结

该研究表明,在大型多校区基于 TBL 的药物治疗学课程中,添加 IVD 可以增强学生的感知、信心和表现。

相似文献

1
Impact of supplemental individual verbal defense on confidence, engagement, and performance in a team-based learning therapeutics course.补充个人口头辩护对团队为基础的学习治疗学课程中的信心、参与度和表现的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Feb;13(2):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
A multiyear analysis of team-based learning in a pharmacotherapeutics course.药物治疗学课程中基于团队学习的多年分析。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Sep 15;78(7):142. doi: 10.5688/ajpe787142.
3
Student Perceptions of Team-based Learning vs Traditional Lecture-based Learning.学生对基于团队的学习与传统讲座式学习的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 May 25;79(4):51. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79451.
4
Using team-based learning in an endocrine module taught across two campuses.在两个校区授课的内分泌学模块中采用基于团队的学习方法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Oct 15;72(5):103. doi: 10.5688/aj7205103.
5
Qualitative Analysis of Student Perceptions Comparing Team-based Learning and Traditional Lecture in a Pharmacotherapeutics Course.药学治疗课程中基于团队学习与传统讲座的学生认知定性分析
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Apr;81(3):55. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81355.
6
Academic performance among pharmacy students using virtual vs. face-to-face team-based learning.药学专业学生采用虚拟与面对面团队学习的学习效果比较。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2349205. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2349205. Epub 2024 May 13.
7
Understanding the early effects of team-based learning on student accountability and engagement using a three session TBL pilot.通过一个为期三节课的团队协作学习试点,了解团队协作学习对学生责任感和参与度的早期影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Sep;9(5):802-807. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.05.024. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
8
Professional and pre-professional pharmacy students' perceptions of team based learning (TBL) at a private research-intensive university.私立研究型大学中专业及准专业药学专业学生对基于团队的学习(TBL)的看法。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jul;9(4):666-670. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Blending team-based learning and game-based learning in pharmacy education.将团队学习和基于游戏的学习融入药学教育。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Aug;13(8):992-997. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
10
Team-based learning versus traditional didactic lectures in teaching clinical biochemistry at King Abdulaziz University; learning outcomes and student satisfaction.团队学习与传统讲授法在阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学临床生物化学教学中的比较;学习成果和学生满意度。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021 Jul;49(4):546-559. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21501. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Curricular changes in times of crisis: Lessons learned.课程变革在危机时刻:经验教训。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2023 Jan;15(1):101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.02.014. Epub 2023 Mar 27.