• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A multiyear analysis of team-based learning in a pharmacotherapeutics course.药物治疗学课程中基于团队学习的多年分析。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Sep 15;78(7):142. doi: 10.5688/ajpe787142.
2
Using team-based learning in an endocrine module taught across two campuses.在两个校区授课的内分泌学模块中采用基于团队的学习方法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Oct 15;72(5):103. doi: 10.5688/aj7205103.
3
Faculty perception of team-based learning over multiple semesters.教师对多学期基于团队学习的看法。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Nov;9(6):1010-1015. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
4
Impact of supplemental individual verbal defense on confidence, engagement, and performance in a team-based learning therapeutics course.补充个人口头辩护对团队为基础的学习治疗学课程中的信心、参与度和表现的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Feb;13(2):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
5
Qualitative Analysis of Student Perceptions Comparing Team-based Learning and Traditional Lecture in a Pharmacotherapeutics Course.药学治疗课程中基于团队学习与传统讲座的学生认知定性分析
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Apr;81(3):55. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81355.
6
Evaluation of a Modified Debate Exercise Adapted to the Pedagogy of Team-Based Learning.评价一种经团队学习教学法改良的辩论练习
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 May;82(4):6278. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6278.
7
Team-based learning in a preclinical removable denture prosthesis module in a United Arab Emirates dental school.在阿联酋一所牙科学校的临床前可摘义齿修复学模块中开展团队学习。
J Dent Educ. 2013 Mar;77(3):351-7.
8
Academic performance among pharmacy students using virtual vs. face-to-face team-based learning.药学专业学生采用虚拟与面对面团队学习的学习效果比较。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2349205. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2349205. Epub 2024 May 13.
9
Student Perceptions of Team-based Learning vs Traditional Lecture-based Learning.学生对基于团队的学习与传统讲座式学习的看法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 May 25;79(4):51. doi: 10.5688/ajpe79451.
10
Integration of team-based learning strategies into a cardiovascular module.将团队学习策略融入心血管模块。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Mar 10;74(2):35. doi: 10.5688/aj740235.

引用本文的文献

1
Team-based learning versus traditional teaching effect on pharmacy Students' Performance: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.基于团队的学习与传统教学对药学专业学生成绩的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Saudi Pharm J. 2024 Apr;32(4):102017. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102017. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
A small-group activity to enhance learning of cardiovascular drugs for health science students.一项小组活动,旨在增强健康科学专业学生对心血管药物的学习。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022 Oct;10(5):e01006. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1006.
3
Student Performance on Graded Versus Ungraded Readiness Assurance Tests in a Team-Based Learning Elective.学生在团队学习选修课程中参加分级和非分级准备保证测试的表现。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Nov;86(9):ajpe8851. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8851. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Comparing Active Learning to Team-Based Learning in Undergraduate Neuroscience.本科神经科学中主动学习与基于团队学习的比较
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2020 Jun 28;18(2):A102-A111. eCollection 2020 Spring.
5
Determining Indicators of High-Quality Application Activities for Team-Based Learning.确定以团队为基础的学习的高质量应用活动的指标。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Nov;83(9):7109. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7109.
6
Assessing Students' Satisfaction with a Redesigned Pharmacology Course Series.评估学生对重新设计的药理学课程系列的满意度。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Sep;83(7):6971. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6971.
7
Using a Novel Student-centered Teaching Method to Improve Pharmacy Student Learning.运用新型以学生为中心的教学方法,提高药学学生的学习效果。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Mar;83(2):6505. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6505.
8
Curricular Reform in Pharmacy Education Through the Lens of the Flexner Report of 1910.通过 1910 年弗莱克斯纳报告看药学教育课程改革
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Sep;82(7):6804. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6804.
9
A Team-based Assignment to Integrate Basic Science and Pharmacotherapeutic Principles for Anticancer Agents.一项基于团队的任务,旨在整合抗癌药物的基础科学和药物治疗原则。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Jun;81(5):93. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81593.
10
A Randomized Crossover Comparison of Team-based Learning and Lecture Format on Learning Outcomes.基于团队学习和讲座形式对学习成果影响的随机交叉比较
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Sep 25;80(7):120. doi: 10.5688/ajpe807120.

本文引用的文献

1
Team-based learning to improve learning outcomes in a therapeutics course sequence.基于团队的学习以提高治疗学课程系列中的学习成果。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Feb 12;78(1):13. doi: 10.5688/ajpe78113.
2
The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME Guide No. 30.团队学习在健康职业教育学习成果中的有效性:基于证据的医学教育指南第 30 号。
Med Teach. 2013 Dec;35(12):e1608-24. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.849802.
3
Best practices for implementing team-based learning in pharmacy education.团队学习在药学教育中的最佳实践。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Oct 14;77(8):177. doi: 10.5688/ajpe778177.
4
Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education 2013 educational outcomes.药剂教育促进中心 2013 年教育成果。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Oct 14;77(8):162. doi: 10.5688/ajpe778162.
5
The emerging primary care workforce: preliminary observations from the primary care team: learning from effective ambulatory practices project.新兴的初级保健劳动力:初级保健团队的初步观察:从有效的门诊实践项目中学习。
Acad Med. 2013 Dec;88(12):1830-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000027.
6
Enhancing team-based active learning through hands-on experience with nicotine replacement therapy.通过尼古丁替代疗法的实践经验来增强基于团队的主动学习。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Aug 12;77(6):128. doi: 10.5688/ajpe776128.
7
Team-based learning in US colleges and schools of pharmacy.美国药学院校的团队学习。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Aug 12;77(6):115. doi: 10.5688/ajpe776115.
8
Team-based learning in pharmacy education.团队学习在药学教育中的应用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):70. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77470.
9
The effects of Team-Based Learning on learning behaviors in the maternal-child nursing course.基于团队的学习对母婴护理课程学习行为的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jan;34(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
10
A multi-instructor, team-based, active-learning exercise to integrate basic and clinical sciences content.一种多教师、团队式、以主动学习为基础的综合基础科学和临床科学内容的练习。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Mar 12;76(2):33. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76233.

药物治疗学课程中基于团队学习的多年分析。

A multiyear analysis of team-based learning in a pharmacotherapeutics course.

作者信息

Johnson June Felice, Bell Edward, Bottenberg Michelle, Eastman Darla, Grady Sarah, Koenigsfeld Carrie, Maki Erik, Meyer Kristin, Phillips Chuck, Schirmer Lori

机构信息

Drake University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Des Moines, Iowa.

Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee ; Author affiliation at time of study was Drake University.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Sep 15;78(7):142. doi: 10.5688/ajpe787142.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe787142
PMID:25258447
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4174384/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of team-based learning (TBL) in a pharmacotherapeutics course on pharmacy students' ratings of faculty instructors and the course, and to assess students' performance after implementation of team-taught TBL.

DESIGN

Teaching methodology in a pharmacotherapeutics course was changed from a lecture with recitation approach in 2 semesters of a 6 credit-hour course to a TBL framework in a 3-semester 3+4+5 credit hour course. The distribution of faculty of instruction was changed from 4 faculty members per week to 1 faculty per 1-credit-hour module. TBL consisted of preclass study preparation, readiness assurance (Individual Readiness Assessment Test and Group Readiness Assessment Test), and in-class application exercises requiring simultaneous team responses.

ASSESSMENT

Retrospective analysis of student ratings of faculty and instructional methods was conducted for the 2 years pre-TBL and 4 years during TBL. Final course grades were evaluated during the same time period. Student ratings showed progressive improvements over 4 years after the introduction of team-based learning. When aggregated, ratings in the "excellent teacher" category were unchanged with TBL compared to pre-TBL. Improvements in faculty instructor approaches to teaching were noted during TBL. Group grades were consistently higher than individual grades, and aggregate course grades were similar to those prior to TBL implementation.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of TBL in a pharmacotherapeutics course series demonstrated the value of team performance over individual performance, indicated positive student perceptions of teaching approaches by course faculty, and resulted in comparable student performance in final course grades compared to the previous teaching method.

摘要

目的

评估基于团队的学习(TBL)在药物治疗学课程中对药学专业学生对教师和课程评分的影响,并评估团队授课的TBL实施后学生的表现。

设计

在一门6学分课程的两个学期中,药物治疗学课程的教学方法从讲授加背诵法改为一门3学期、3+4+5学分课程中的TBL框架。授课教师的分配从每周4名教师改为每1学分模块1名教师。TBL包括课前学习准备、准备情况保证(个人准备情况评估测试和小组准备情况评估测试)以及需要团队同时作答的课堂应用练习。

评估

对TBL实施前2年和TBL实施期间4年学生对教师和教学方法的评分进行回顾性分析。在同一时期评估课程最终成绩。引入基于团队的学习后,学生评分在4年中逐步提高。汇总后,与TBL实施前相比,“优秀教师”类别的评分没有变化。在TBL实施期间,注意到教师教学方法有所改进。小组成绩始终高于个人成绩,课程总成绩与TBL实施前相似。

结论

在药物治疗学课程系列中实施TBL证明了团队表现优于个人表现的价值,表明学生对课程教师的教学方法有积极的看法,并且与之前的教学方法相比,学生在课程最终成绩中的表现相当。