Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
J Psychosom Res. 2021 Mar;142:110356. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110356. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
Poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is associated with a high risk of acute exacerbations in patients with asthma. The use of health state utility instruments to measure HRQoL is common, but it has been criticised for failing to adequately capture the impact of the condition from the patient perspective. We aimed to assess the ability of subjective wellbeing and health state utility instruments to capture important HRQoL dimensions for asthma patients.
Regression analyses were conducted using data (n = 856 asthma patients) from a large multi-national cross-sectional survey to explore the relationship between subjective wellbeing (ONS4, PWI, SWLS), health state utility (15D, AQoL-8D, EQ-5D-5L, HUI3, SF-6D, SF-6Dv2), and an asthma-specific instrument (AQLQ-S). The latent structure of different instruments was investigated using an exploratory factor analysis.
All instruments could distinguish the impact of asthma on HRQoL. Among health utility instruments, 15D, SF-6D and AQoL-8D were more sensitive based on the average standardised regression coefficients. AQOL-8D had the strongest correlation with subjective wellbeing. Nevertheless, the exploratory factor analysis showed a complementary relationship between subjective wellbeing and HRQoL instruments. The most important subjective wellbeing domains were standard of living, achieving in life, and personal relationships; although contributions of these domains to overall life satisfaction differed among asthma patients identified by a latent class analysis.
The use of subjective wellbeing alongside AQLQ-S and health state utility instruments provides a comprehensive approach to assess the impact of asthma on the patient's life. Further research is needed to incorporate these measures in health care evaluation.
较差的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)与哮喘患者急性加重的风险较高相关。使用健康状态效用工具来衡量 HRQoL 很常见,但它因未能从患者角度充分捕捉到病情的影响而受到批评。我们旨在评估主观幸福感和健康状态效用工具在捕捉哮喘患者重要 HRQoL 维度方面的能力。
使用来自一项大型跨国横断面调查的数据(n=856 例哮喘患者)进行回归分析,以探讨主观幸福感(ONS4、PWI、SWLS)、健康状态效用(15D、AQoL-8D、EQ-5D-5L、HUI3、SF-6D、SF-6Dv2)与哮喘专用仪器(AQLQ-S)之间的关系。使用探索性因子分析研究了不同仪器的潜在结构。
所有仪器都能区分哮喘对 HRQoL 的影响。在健康效用工具中,15D、SF-6D 和 AQoL-8D 的平均标准化回归系数更敏感。AQOL-8D 与主观幸福感相关性最强。然而,探索性因子分析显示主观幸福感和 HRQoL 仪器之间存在互补关系。最重要的主观幸福感领域是生活水平、实现生活和人际关系;尽管潜类分析确定的哮喘患者对整体生活满意度的这些领域的贡献不同。
使用主观幸福感以及 AQLQ-S 和健康状态效用工具提供了一种全面的方法来评估哮喘对患者生活的影响。需要进一步研究将这些措施纳入医疗保健评估中。