Centre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Oral Medicine, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
J Anat. 2021 Jun;238(6):1371-1385. doi: 10.1111/joa.13387. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
A common question in organ regeneration is the extent to which regeneration recapitulates embryonic development. To investigate this concept, we compared the expression of two highly interlinked and essential genes for salivary gland development, Sox9 and Fgf10, during submandibular gland development, homeostasis and regeneration. Salivary gland duct ligation/deligation model was used as a regenerative model. Fgf10 and Sox9 expression changed during regeneration compared to homeostasis, suggesting that these key developmental genes play important roles during regeneration, however, significantly both displayed different patterns of expression in the regenerating gland compared to the developing gland. Regenerating glands, which during homeostasis had very few weakly expressing Sox9-positive cells in the striated/granular ducts, displayed elevated expression of Sox9 within these ducts. This pattern is in contrast to embryonic development, where Sox9 expression was absent in the proximally developing ducts. However, similar to the elevated expression at the distal tip of the epithelium in developing salivary glands, regenerating glands displayed elevated expression in a subpopulation of acinar cells, which during homeostasis expressed Sox9 at lower levels. A shift in expression of Fgf10 was observed from a widespread mesenchymal pattern during organogenesis to a more limited and predominantly epithelial pattern during homeostasis in the adult. This restricted expression in epithelial cells was maintained during regeneration, with no clear upregulation in the surrounding mesenchyme, as might be expected if regeneration recapitulated development. As both Fgf10 and Sox9 were upregulated in proximal ducts during regeneration, this suggests that the positive regulation of Sox9 by Fgf10, essential during development, is partially reawakened during regeneration using this model. Together these data suggest that developmentally important genes play a key role in salivary gland regeneration but do not precisely mimic the roles observed during development.
器官再生中的一个常见问题是再生在多大程度上再现胚胎发育。为了研究这一概念,我们比较了唾液腺发育、Sox9 和 Fgf10 这两个高度连锁和必需的基因在颌下腺发育、稳态和再生过程中的表达。唾液腺导管结扎/切断模型被用作再生模型。与稳态相比,Fgf10 和 Sox9 的表达在再生过程中发生了变化,这表明这些关键发育基因在再生过程中发挥着重要作用,然而,在再生腺中,它们的表达模式与发育腺显著不同。在稳态下,条纹/颗粒状导管中仅有少量表达 Sox9 的弱阳性细胞的再生腺中,Sox9 的表达升高。这种模式与胚胎发育形成鲜明对比,在胚胎发育中,Sox9 不存在于近端发育的导管中。然而,与发育中的唾液腺中上皮末端的高表达相似,再生腺中在一个亚群的腺泡细胞中表达升高,这些细胞在稳态时 Sox9 的表达水平较低。在器官发生过程中,Fgf10 的表达从广泛的间充质模式转变为成年期稳态时更局限且主要的上皮模式。在再生过程中,这种在上皮细胞中的限制表达得以维持,周围的间充质没有明显的上调,这与再生再现发育的预期相反。由于 Fgf10 和 Sox9 在再生过程中均在上皮细胞中上调,这表明在发育过程中至关重要的 Sox9 由 Fgf10 正向调控,在该模型的再生过程中部分被重新激活。这些数据表明,发育相关基因在唾液腺再生中发挥着关键作用,但并不完全模仿在发育过程中观察到的作用。