Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Bone Joint J. 2021 Mar;103-B(3):515-521. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2020-1480.R2. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
Removal of infected components and culture-directed antibiotics are important for the successful treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, as many as 27% of chronic PJI patients yield negative culture results. Although culture negativity has been thought of as a contraindication to one-stage revision, data supporting this assertion are limited. The aim of our study was to report on the clinical outcomes for one-stage and two-stage exchange arthroplasty performed in patients with chronic culture-negative PJI.
A total of 105 consecutive patients who underwent revision arthroplasty for chronic culture-negative PJI were retrospectively evaluated. One-stage revision arthroplasty was performed in 30 patients, while 75 patients underwent two-stage exchange, with a minimum of one year's follow-up. Reinfection, re-revision for septic and aseptic reasons, amputation, readmission, mortality, and length of stay were compared between the two treatment strategies.
The patient demographic characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. At a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, the treatment failure for reinfection for one-stage and two-stage revision was five (16.7%) and 15 patients (20.0%) (p = 0.691), and for septic re-revision was four (13.3%) and 11 patients (14.7%) (p = 0.863), respectively. No significant differences were observed between one-stage and two-stage revision for 30- 60- and 90-day readmissions (10.0% vs 8.0%; p = 0.714; 16.7% vs 9.3%; p = 0.325; and 26.7% vs 10.7%; p = 0.074), one-year mortality (3.3% vs 4.0%; p > 0.999), and amputation (3.3% vs 1.3%; p = 0.496).
In this non-randomized study, one-stage revision arthroplasty demonstrated similar outcomes including reinfection, re-revision, and readmission rates for the treatment of chronic culture-negative PJI after TKA and THA compared to two-stage revision. This suggests culture negativity may not be a contraindication to one-stage revision arthroplasty for chronic culture-negative PJI in selected patients. Cite this article: 2021;103-B(3):515-521.
清除感染组织和进行靶向培养的抗生素治疗对于慢性假体周围关节感染(PJI)的成功治疗非常重要。然而,多达 27%的慢性 PJI 患者的培养结果呈阴性。尽管培养阴性被认为是一期翻修的禁忌症,但支持这一观点的数据有限。本研究的目的是报告在 TKA 和 THA 后慢性培养阴性 PJI 患者进行一期和二期翻修的临床结果。
回顾性评估了 105 例因慢性培养阴性 PJI 接受翻修手术的连续患者。30 例患者行一期翻修,75 例患者行二期翻修,随访至少 1 年。比较两种治疗策略之间的再感染、因感染和无菌性原因再次翻修、截肢、再入院、死亡率和住院时间。
两组患者的人口统计学特征无显著差异。在平均 4.2 年的随访中,一期和二期翻修的再感染治疗失败率分别为 5 例(16.7%)和 15 例(20.0%)(p=0.691),因感染再次翻修的比例分别为 4 例(13.3%)和 11 例(14.7%)(p=0.863)。一期和二期翻修在 30-60-90 天再入院率(10.0%比 8.0%;p=0.714;16.7%比 9.3%;p=0.325;26.7%比 10.7%;p=0.074)、一年死亡率(3.3%比 4.0%;p>0.999)和截肢率(3.3%比 1.3%;p=0.496)方面无显著差异。
在这项非随机研究中,与二期翻修相比,一期翻修治疗 TKA 和 THA 后慢性培养阴性 PJI 的再感染、再次翻修和再入院率相似,这表明在某些患者中,培养阴性可能不是一期翻修的禁忌症。引用本文:2021;103-B(3):515-521.