Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy in acute and subacute lower-extremity ischemia: impact of adjunctive, solely nonthrombolytic endovascular procedures.

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the role of adjunctive, solely nonthrombolytic endovascular therapy in treatment of acute lower-extremity ischemia by rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center evaluation of 165 patients (167 limbs) that underwent rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy between 2009 and 2016 was performed.

RESULTS

Rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy was used as a single therapy in 9.0% (15 limbs), followed by percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy in 6.0% (10 limbs), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in 19.8% (33 limbs) and stenting in 25.7% (43 limbs). Rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy was followed by any combination of these three interventions in 39.5%. Clinical and technical success was documented in 92.2%, complications in 10.3% (n=17). No significant difference in clinical and technical success was observed using rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy alone or with additional endovascular therapy. On a long-term basis, the re-ischemia-free survival was nearly twice as high as in previous studies that reported more cases treated by rotational percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy alone.

CONCLUSION

To assure a long-lasting primary patency after percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, concomitant treatment of underlying lesions with adjunctive, nonthrombolytic endovascular methods should be considered.