Biney Adriana A E, Wright Kalifa J, Kushitor Mawuli K, Jackson Elizabeth F, Phillips James F, Awoonor-Williams John Koku, Bawah Ayaga A
Regional Institute for Population Studies (RIPS), University of Ghana, P. O. Box LG 96, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032 USA.
Genus. 2021;77(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41118-020-00110-6. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Regional contraceptive use differentials are pronounced in Ghana, with the lowest levels occurring in the Northern Region. Community-based health services, intended to promote maternal and child health and family planning use, may have failed to address this problem. This paper presents an analysis of qualitative data on community perspectives on family planning "readiness," "willingness," and "ability" compiled in the course of 20 focus group discussions with residents (mothers and fathers of children under five, young boys and girls, and community elders) of two communities each in two Northern Region districts that were either equipped with or lacking direct access to community health services. The study districts are localities where contraceptive use is uncommon and fertility is exceptionally high. Results suggest that direct access to community services has had no impact on contraceptive attitudes or practice. Widespread method knowledge is often offset by side-effect misperceptions. Social constraints are prominent owing to opposition from men. Findings attest to the need to improve the provision of contraceptive information and expand method choice options. Because societal acceptance and access in this patriarchal setting is critical to use, frontline worker deployment should prioritize strategies for outreach to men and community groups with prominent attention to social mobilization themes and strategies that support family planning.
加纳地区避孕措施使用情况差异显著,北部地区的使用率最低。旨在促进母婴健康和计划生育使用的社区卫生服务可能未能解决这一问题。本文对定性数据进行了分析,这些数据来自于与北部地区两个区的两个社区的居民(五岁以下儿童的父母、年轻男孩和女孩以及社区长者)进行的20次焦点小组讨论,这些社区有的配备了社区卫生服务,有的则无法直接获得社区卫生服务。研究地区是避孕措施使用不常见且生育率极高的地方。结果表明,直接获得社区服务对避孕态度或行为没有影响。广泛的方法知识常常被对副作用的误解所抵消。由于男性的反对,社会限制很突出。研究结果证明有必要改善避孕信息的提供并扩大方法选择。由于在这种父权制环境中社会接受度和可及性对避孕措施的使用至关重要,一线工作人员的部署应优先考虑针对男性和社区团体的外展策略,尤其要关注支持计划生育的社会动员主题和策略。