Midgette Allegra J
Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
J Marriage Fam. 2020 Aug;82(4):1358-1377. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12673. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
The present study set out to investigate how Chinese and South Korean families conceptualize fairness and a fair division of household labor.
Previous cross-cultural research has found that a good portion of women and men find the gendered division of household labor fair. In response, scholars have attempted to discover what factors lead to a greater likelihood of reporting a gendered division fair. However, the majority of the scholarship on fairness perceptions has been limited to survey methods, in which fairness is not defined, and the individual's reasons for their fairness perception is not investigated.
This study employed thematic analysis of in-depth interviews with the members of 12 Chinese (N=39) and 12 Korean (N=40) families.
No participation in household labor was considered across families to be unfair. On the other hand, the majority of participants justified an unequal division to be fair based on gendered applications of differences in time-availability and levels of tiredness, in which the amount of housework that each member should do was left unspecified.
Many adult participants believed that fairness should not apply to the family context. Instead, most participants argued that household labor should be divided based on emotional satisfaction, maintained through mechanisms of understanding and agreement.
Future studies on fairness perceptions should clearly define what they mean by "fairness," and the gendering of gender-neutral appearing justifications such as time-availability should be further investigated.
本研究旨在调查中国和韩国家庭如何理解公平以及家务劳动的公平分配。
以往的跨文化研究发现,很大一部分女性和男性认为家务劳动的性别分工是公平的。对此,学者们试图找出哪些因素会导致更有可能认为性别分工是公平的。然而,大多数关于公平观念的学术研究仅限于调查方法,在这种方法中,公平没有被定义,个人对其公平观念的原因也没有被调查。
本研究对12个中国家庭(N = 39)和12个韩国家庭(N = 40)的成员进行了深入访谈,并采用了主题分析法。
所有家庭都认为不参与家务劳动是不公平的。另一方面,大多数参与者基于时间可用性和疲劳程度差异的性别化应用,认为不平等的分工是公平的,其中每个成员应该做的家务量没有明确规定。
许多成年参与者认为公平不适用于家庭环境。相反,大多数参与者认为家务劳动应该基于情感满意度进行分配,并通过理解和认同的机制来维持。
未来关于公平观念的研究应该明确界定“公平”的含义,并且应该进一步研究诸如时间可用性等看似中性的理由的性别化问题。