• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息交流时间表:对伦敦救护车服务国民保健服务信托基金针对“统一应对演习”的前线通信和应急响应的服务评估

The timeline of information exchange: a service evaluation of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust's front line communication and emergency response to Exercise Unified Response.

作者信息

Nunan Jordan, Palfreyman-Jones Samantha, Milne Rebecca, Wakefield Alison

机构信息

University of Portsmouth: ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-003X.

London Ambulance Service NHS Trust.

出版信息

Br Paramed J. 2020 Mar 1;4(4):40-49. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2020.12.4.4.40.

DOI:10.29045/14784726.2020.12.4.4.40
PMID:33456378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7783902/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Exercise Unified Response, Europe's largest major incident training exercise to date, provided a rich environment for the emergency services to test their multi-agency crisis response capabilities. Supported by the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, this service evaluation examined London Ambulance Service NHS Trust front line communication and decision-making via body-worn camera footage.

METHODS

Twenty London Ambulance Service NHS Trust front line responders and evaluators were each equipped with a body-worn camera during Exercise Unified Response. The service evaluation aimed to: (a) produce timelines of the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust's response in order to identify key events and actions during the 'golden hour' (the crucial first hour in the care of trauma patients), the proceedings of command meetings and the multi-agency response; and (b) develop recommendations for future training and evaluations.

RESULTS

The service evaluation identified that, within the golden hour, London Ambulance Service NHS Trust first responders rightly and rapidly declared the event a major incident, requested resources and assigned roles. Triage crews were tasked quickly, though it was identified that their efficiency may be further enhanced through more detailed triage briefings prior to entering the scene. The command meetings (led by the Metropolitan Police) lacked efficiency, and all agencies could make more effective use of the multi-agency shared radio network to address ongoing matters. Finally, London Fire Brigade and London Ambulance Service NHS Trust teams demonstrated clear communication and co-ordination towards casualty extraction.

CONCLUSION

Successful multi-agency working requires clear communication, information sharing and timely command meetings. It is recommended that Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles multi-agency talk groups should be utilised more frequently and used to complete a joint METHANE report. In addition, training in areas such as communication skills and detailed briefings will enhance the front line response. Finally, body-worn cameras are shown to be an effective service evaluation tool, as a basis for promoting best practice as well as highlighting areas for future training and evaluations.

摘要

引言

“联合应急行动”是欧洲迄今为止规模最大的重大事件培训演习,为应急服务部门提供了一个丰富的环境,用以测试其多机构危机应对能力。在伦敦救护车服务国民保健服务信托基金的支持下,这项服务评估通过佩戴在身上的摄像头拍摄的影像,审视了伦敦救护车服务国民保健服务信托基金一线的沟通与决策情况。

方法

在“联合应急行动”演习期间,20名伦敦救护车服务国民保健服务信托基金的一线响应人员和评估人员每人都配备了一台佩戴在身上的摄像头。这项服务评估旨在:(a)制作伦敦救护车服务国民保健服务信托基金响应情况的时间线,以便确定“黄金一小时”(创伤患者护理的关键首个小时)期间的关键事件和行动、指挥会议的进程以及多机构响应情况;(b)为未来的培训和评估制定建议。

结果

服务评估发现,在黄金一小时内,伦敦救护车服务国民保健服务信托基金的首批响应人员正确且迅速地将该事件宣布为重大事件,请求资源并分配了任务。分诊人员很快接到了任务,但发现通过在进入现场之前进行更详细的分诊简报,他们的效率可能会进一步提高。指挥会议(由伦敦警察厅主持)缺乏效率,所有机构都可以更有效地利用多机构共享无线电网络来处理正在进行的事务。最后,伦敦消防队和伦敦救护车服务国民保健服务信托基金的团队在伤员撤离方面展示了清晰的沟通与协调。

结论

成功的多机构协作需要清晰的沟通、信息共享和及时的指挥会议。建议更频繁地使用联合应急服务互操作性原则多机构通话组,并用于完成一份联合甲烷报告。此外,在沟通技巧和详细简报等领域的培训将加强一线响应。最后,佩戴在身上的摄像头被证明是一种有效的服务评估工具,可作为推广最佳实践以及突出未来培训和评估领域的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7783902/c159990315b4/BPJ-4-4-40-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7783902/85689b393bde/BPJ-4-4-40-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7783902/dec36309ee26/BPJ-4-4-40-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7783902/494a570fe123/BPJ-4-4-40-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7783902/4775fbda11db/BPJ-4-4-40-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7783902/c159990315b4/BPJ-4-4-40-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7783902/85689b393bde/BPJ-4-4-40-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7783902/dec36309ee26/BPJ-4-4-40-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7783902/494a570fe123/BPJ-4-4-40-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7783902/4775fbda11db/BPJ-4-4-40-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c228/7783902/c159990315b4/BPJ-4-4-40-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The timeline of information exchange: a service evaluation of London Ambulance Service NHS Trust's front line communication and emergency response to Exercise Unified Response.信息交流时间表:对伦敦救护车服务国民保健服务信托基金针对“统一应对演习”的前线通信和应急响应的服务评估
Br Paramed J. 2020 Mar 1;4(4):40-49. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2020.12.4.4.40.
2
3
[Emergency medical service response to major incidents. A study of 21 cases].[紧急医疗服务对重大事件的响应。21例病例研究]
Anaesthesist. 1997 Feb;46(2):114-20. doi: 10.1007/s001010050380.
4
5
Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?放射性物质释放的应急响应:我们是否已与应急响应人员群体进行了有效沟通,使其做好安全应对这些事件的准备?
Health Phys. 2018 Feb;114(2):208-213. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000757.
6
Communication in a crisis in UK ambulance services: What is needed to improve incident communication?
J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 2018 Jan 1;11(4):309-316.
7
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
8
Managing multiple-casualty incidents: a rural medical preparedness training assessment.处理多伤员事件:农村医疗准备培训评估。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Aug;28(4):334-41. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X13000423. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
9
Exploring community level multi-agency communication and collaboration during the emergency response to the covid-19 pandemic.探索在新冠疫情应急响应期间社区层面的多机构沟通与协作。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2023 Nov 2;6:100443. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2023.100443. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Misuse of the London ambulance service: How much and why?伦敦救护车服务的滥用情况:程度如何?原因何在?
J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;15(6):368-70. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.6.368.

本文引用的文献

1
Coordinated action in multiteam systems.多团队系统中的协调行动。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jul;97(4):808-24. doi: 10.1037/a0026682. Epub 2011 Dec 26.