Depauw Nicolas, Batin Estelle, Johnson Andrew, MacDonald Shannon M, Jimenez Rachel B
Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020 May 26;14:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.04.003. eCollection 2020 Apr.
Breast cancer patients receiving radiation are traditionally positioned with both arms up, but this may not be feasible or comfortable for all patients. We evaluated the treatment planning and positioning reproducibility differences between the arms up and arms down positions for patients receiving post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) using proton pencil beam scanning (PBS).
Ten PMRT patients who were scheduled to receive PBS underwent CT-based treatment planning in both an arms down and a standard arms up position. An arms down contouring atlas was developed for consistency in treatment planning. Treatment plans were performed on both scans. A Wilcoxon test was applied to compare arms up and arms down metrics across patients. Five patients received treatment in the arms-down position at our institution while others were treated with the arms up. Residual set-up errors were recorded for each patient's treatment fractions and compared between positions.
Target structure coverage remained consistent between the arms up and arms down positions. In regard to the OAR, the heart mean and maximum doses were statistically significantly lower in the arms up position versus the arms down position, however, the absolute differences were modest. Patients demonstrated similar setup errors, less than 0.5 mm differences, in all directions.
PBS for PMRT in the arms down position appeared stable and reproducible compared to the traditional arms up positioning. The degree of OAR sparing in the arms down group was minimally less robust but still far superior to conventional photon therapy.
接受放疗的乳腺癌患者传统上双臂上举定位,但并非所有患者都可行或舒适。我们评估了接受乳房切除术后放疗(PMRT)的患者在双臂上举和双臂下垂体位下使用质子笔形束扫描(PBS)进行治疗计划和定位的可重复性差异。
10例计划接受PBS的PMRT患者在双臂下垂和标准双臂上举体位下进行基于CT的治疗计划。为确保治疗计划的一致性,制定了双臂下垂轮廓图谱。对两种扫描都进行了治疗计划。应用Wilcoxon检验比较患者双臂上举和双臂下垂的指标。5例患者在我们机构采用双臂下垂体位接受治疗,其他患者采用双臂上举体位治疗。记录每位患者治疗分次的残余摆位误差,并比较两种体位之间的差异。
双臂上举和双臂下垂体位下靶区结构覆盖情况保持一致。关于危及器官(OAR),双臂上举体位中心脏的平均剂量和最大剂量在统计学上显著低于双臂下垂体位,然而,绝对差异不大。患者在各个方向上的摆位误差相似,差异小于0.5毫米。
与传统的双臂上举定位相比,PMRT采用双臂下垂体位的PBS似乎稳定且可重复。双臂下垂组中对OAR的保护程度略低,但仍远优于传统光子治疗。