Pang Eric Pei Ping, Knight Kellie, Fan Qiao, Tan Sheena Xue Fei, Ang Khong Wei, Master Zubin, Mui Wing-Ho, Leung Ronnie Wing-Kin, Baird Marilyn, Tuan Jeffrey Kit Loong
Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore 169610, Singapore.
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Department of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar 28;5:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.03.008. eCollection 2018 Jan.
During radiotherapy, prostate motion changes over time. Quantifying and accounting for this motion is essential. This study aimed to assess intra-fraction prostate motion and derive duration-dependent planning margins for two treatment techniques.
A four-dimension (4D) transperineal ultrasound Clarity® system was used to track prostate motion. We analysed 1913 fractions from 60 patients undergoing volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the prostate. The mean VMAT treatment duration was 3.4 min. Extended monitoring was conducted weekly to simulate motion during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment (an additional seven minutes). A motion-time trend analysis was conducted and the mean intra-fraction motion between VMAT and IMRT treatments compared. Duration-dependent margins were calculated and anisotropic margins for VMAT and IMRT treatments were derived.
There were statistically significant differences in the mean intra-fraction motion between VMAT and the simulated IMRT duration in the inferior (0.1 mm versus 0.3 mm) and posterior (-0.2 versus -0.4 mm) directions respectively (p ≪ 0.01). An intra-fraction motion trend inferiorly and posteriorly was observed. The recommended minimum anisotropic margins are 1.7 mm/2.7 mm (superior/inferior); 0.8 mm (left/right), 1.7 mm/2.9 mm (anterior/posterior) for VMAT treatments and 2.9 mm/4.3 mm (superior/inferior), 1.5 mm (left/right), 2.8 mm/4.8 mm (anterior/posterior) for IMRT treatments. Smaller anisotropic margins were required for VMAT compared to IMRT (differences ranging from 1.2 to 1.6 mm superiorly/inferiorly, 0.7 mm laterally and 1.1-1.9 mm anteriorly/posteriorly).
VMAT treatment is preferred over IMRT as prostate motion increases with time. Larger margins should be employed in the inferior and posterior directions for both treatment durations. Duration-dependent margins should be applied in the presence of prolonged imaging and verification time.
在放射治疗期间,前列腺运动会随时间变化。对这种运动进行量化和考虑至关重要。本研究旨在评估分次治疗期间前列腺的运动,并为两种治疗技术得出与持续时间相关的计划边界。
使用四维(4D)经会阴超声Clarity®系统跟踪前列腺运动。我们分析了60例接受前列腺容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)患者的1913个分次治疗。VMAT的平均治疗持续时间为3.4分钟。每周进行延长监测以模拟调强放射治疗(IMRT)期间的运动(额外7分钟)。进行了运动-时间趋势分析,并比较了VMAT和IMRT治疗期间的平均分次运动。计算了与持续时间相关的边界,并得出了VMAT和IMRT治疗的各向异性边界。
VMAT与模拟的IMRT持续时间之间,在下方方向(分别为0.1毫米对0.3毫米)和后方方向(-0.2对-0.4毫米)的平均分次运动存在统计学显著差异(p≪0.01)。观察到在下方和后方方向存在分次运动趋势。对于VMAT治疗,推荐的最小各向异性边界为1.7毫米/2.7毫米(上方/下方);0.8毫米(左侧/右侧),1.7毫米/2.9毫米(前方/后方);对于IMRT治疗,推荐的最小各向异性边界为2.9毫米/4.3毫米(上方/下方),1.5毫米(左侧/右侧),2.8毫米/4.8毫米(前方/后方)。与IMRT相比,VMAT需要更小的各向异性边界(上方/下方差异范围为1.2至1.6毫米,横向为0.7毫米,前方/后方为1.1至1.9毫米)。
随着时间推移,前列腺运动增加,VMAT治疗优于IMRT。对于两种治疗持续时间,在下方和后方方向应采用更大的边界。在存在延长成像和验证时间的情况下,应应用与持续时间相关的边界。