Suppr超能文献

日本成年人家庭自我中心量表的心理测量特性

Psychometric properties of the Family Allocentrism Scale among Japanese adults.

作者信息

Ujiie Yuta, Takahashi Kohske

机构信息

Graduate School of Psychology, Chukyo University, 101-2 Yagoto Honmachi, Showa-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi, 466-8666, Japan.

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2020 Dec 30;7(1):e05871. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05871. eCollection 2021 Jan.

Abstract

The Family Allocentrism Scale (FAS) was developed to assess individual differences in allocentrism-idiocentrism with reference to the family. To date, no prior study has adequately investigated the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the FAS in Japanese samples, although Japanese culture is considered as a symbol of an interdependent (or collectivist) culture. This study attempted to demonstrate the validity of the factor structure and the convergent validity of the Japanese version of the FAS in a sample of Japanese adults. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed a lack of fit of the one-factor model for all FAS items but the fit improved to the acceptable level if some items with low factor loadings were removed. The internal consistency measure (Cronbach's alpha) of the FAS indicated an acceptable level of reliability. The results also showed that the FAS scores were closely related to the scores of horizontal collectivism, vertical collectivism, and interdependence. Our findings indicate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FAS, thereby providing a validated tool for the investigation of cross-cultural differences in family allocentrism-idiocentrism.

摘要

家庭中心主义量表(FAS)旨在评估个体在以家庭为参照的中心主义-自我中心主义方面的差异。尽管日本文化被视为相互依存(或集体主义)文化的象征,但迄今为止,尚无先前的研究充分调查日语版FAS在日本样本中的心理测量特性。本研究试图在日本成年人样本中验证日语版FAS的因子结构有效性和收敛效度。验证性因子分析结果显示,所有FAS项目的单因素模型拟合不佳,但如果去除一些因子载荷较低的项目,拟合度会提高到可接受水平。FAS的内部一致性测量(Cronbach's alpha)表明可靠性处于可接受水平。结果还表明,FAS得分与水平集体主义、垂直集体主义和相互依存得分密切相关。我们的研究结果表明了日语版FAS的有效性和可靠性,从而为研究家庭中心主义-自我中心主义的跨文化差异提供了一个经过验证的工具。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Family Allocentrism Scale among Japanese adults.
Heliyon. 2020 Dec 30;7(1):e05871. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05871. eCollection 2021 Jan.
2
Family allocentrism and its relation to adjustment among Chinese and Italian adolescents.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.036. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Fatigue Assessment Scale.
Intern Med. 2025 Mar 1;64(5):658-663. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4101-24. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
7
Cross-cultural measurement invariance evidence of individualism and collectivism: from the idiosyncratic to universal.
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;14:1150757. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150757. eCollection 2023.
9
Development of a Japanese version of the reported and intended behaviour scale: reliability and validity.
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014 Jun;68(6):448-55. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12151. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Sinhala version of Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199820. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual Attention to Novel Products - Cross-Cultural Insights From Physiological Data.
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 8;13:840862. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840862. eCollection 2022.
2
The Effects of Traditional Concepts on Personal Values Among University Students in China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 28;13:872768. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872768. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Family allocentrism and its relation to adjustment among Chinese and Italian adolescents.
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.036. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
3
Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 6;107(14):6192-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001911107. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
4
Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism-collectivism: a comparison of African Americans and European Americans.
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2008 Oct;14(4):336-43. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.14.4.336.
5
Culture and point of view.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16;100(19):11163-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1934527100. Epub 2003 Sep 5.
6
Individualism-collectivism and personality.
J Pers. 2001 Dec;69(6):907-24. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.696169.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验