• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Family Allocentrism Scale among Japanese adults.日本成年人家庭自我中心量表的心理测量特性
Heliyon. 2020 Dec 30;7(1):e05871. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05871. eCollection 2021 Jan.
2
Family allocentrism and its relation to adjustment among Chinese and Italian adolescents.中、意青少年家庭中心主义及其与适应的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.036. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
3
Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Auckland individualism and collectivism scale: relationship between individualism/collectivism and mental health.奥克兰个人主义与集体主义量表日文版的编制与验证:个人主义/集体主义与心理健康的关系
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 13;15:1448461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1448461. eCollection 2024.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Fatigue Assessment Scale.疲劳评估量表日语版的信度与效度
Intern Med. 2025 Mar 1;64(5):658-663. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.4101-24. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
5
Dimensions of familial allocentrism in Brazilian mothers from state capitals and small cities.巴西首府和小城市母亲家庭中心主义的维度。
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E44. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.13.
6
Leadership, OCB and Individual Differences: Idiocentrism and Allocentrism as Moderators of the Relationship between Transformational and Transactional Leadership and OCB.领导能力、组织公民行为与个体差异:自我中心主义和他人中心主义作为变革型领导与交易型领导和组织公民行为之间关系的调节变量
Leadersh Q. 2011 Apr 1;22(2):353-366. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.010.
7
Cross-cultural measurement invariance evidence of individualism and collectivism: from the idiosyncratic to universal.个人主义与集体主义的跨文化测量不变性证据:从特质到普遍特征
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;14:1150757. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150757. eCollection 2023.
8
Associations of collectivism with relationship commitment, passion, and mate preferences: opposing roles of parental influence and family allocentrism.集体主义与关系承诺、激情和配偶偏好的关联:父母影响和家庭自我中心主义的相反作用。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 26;10(2):e0117374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117374. eCollection 2015.
9
Development of a Japanese version of the reported and intended behaviour scale: reliability and validity.报告和预期行为量表的日文化版本的开发:信度和效度。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2014 Jun;68(6):448-55. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12151. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Sinhala version of Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale.《斯里兰卡版洛顿工具性日常生活活动量表的跨文化调适与心理计量评估》
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 28;13(6):e0199820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199820. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual Attention to Novel Products - Cross-Cultural Insights From Physiological Data.对新奇产品的视觉注意力——来自生理数据的跨文化见解
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 8;13:840862. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840862. eCollection 2022.
2
The Effects of Traditional Concepts on Personal Values Among University Students in China.传统观念对中国大学生个人价值观的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 28;13:872768. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872768. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Family allocentrism and its relation to adjustment among Chinese and Italian adolescents.中、意青少年家庭中心主义及其与适应的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.036. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
2
Dimensions of familial allocentrism in Brazilian mothers from state capitals and small cities.巴西首府和小城市母亲家庭中心主义的维度。
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E44. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.13.
3
Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences.文化差异并不总是可以归结为个体差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 6;107(14):6192-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001911107. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
4
Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism-collectivism: a comparison of African Americans and European Americans.个人主义与集体主义的横向和纵向维度:非裔美国人和欧裔美国人的比较
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2008 Oct;14(4):336-43. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.14.4.336.
5
Culture and point of view.文化与观点。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16;100(19):11163-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1934527100. Epub 2003 Sep 5.
6
Individualism-collectivism and personality.个人主义-集体主义与个性
J Pers. 2001 Dec;69(6):907-24. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.696169.

日本成年人家庭自我中心量表的心理测量特性

Psychometric properties of the Family Allocentrism Scale among Japanese adults.

作者信息

Ujiie Yuta, Takahashi Kohske

机构信息

Graduate School of Psychology, Chukyo University, 101-2 Yagoto Honmachi, Showa-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi, 466-8666, Japan.

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2020 Dec 30;7(1):e05871. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05871. eCollection 2021 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05871
PMID:33458445
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7797502/
Abstract

The Family Allocentrism Scale (FAS) was developed to assess individual differences in allocentrism-idiocentrism with reference to the family. To date, no prior study has adequately investigated the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the FAS in Japanese samples, although Japanese culture is considered as a symbol of an interdependent (or collectivist) culture. This study attempted to demonstrate the validity of the factor structure and the convergent validity of the Japanese version of the FAS in a sample of Japanese adults. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis showed a lack of fit of the one-factor model for all FAS items but the fit improved to the acceptable level if some items with low factor loadings were removed. The internal consistency measure (Cronbach's alpha) of the FAS indicated an acceptable level of reliability. The results also showed that the FAS scores were closely related to the scores of horizontal collectivism, vertical collectivism, and interdependence. Our findings indicate the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FAS, thereby providing a validated tool for the investigation of cross-cultural differences in family allocentrism-idiocentrism.

摘要

家庭中心主义量表(FAS)旨在评估个体在以家庭为参照的中心主义-自我中心主义方面的差异。尽管日本文化被视为相互依存(或集体主义)文化的象征,但迄今为止,尚无先前的研究充分调查日语版FAS在日本样本中的心理测量特性。本研究试图在日本成年人样本中验证日语版FAS的因子结构有效性和收敛效度。验证性因子分析结果显示,所有FAS项目的单因素模型拟合不佳,但如果去除一些因子载荷较低的项目,拟合度会提高到可接受水平。FAS的内部一致性测量(Cronbach's alpha)表明可靠性处于可接受水平。结果还表明,FAS得分与水平集体主义、垂直集体主义和相互依存得分密切相关。我们的研究结果表明了日语版FAS的有效性和可靠性,从而为研究家庭中心主义-自我中心主义的跨文化差异提供了一个经过验证的工具。