• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Culture and point of view.文化与观点。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16;100(19):11163-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1934527100. Epub 2003 Sep 5.
2
Culture and change blindness.文化与变化盲视。
Cogn Sci. 2006 Mar 4;30(2):381-99. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_63.
3
Ecocultural basis of cognition: farmers and fishermen are more holistic than herders.认知的生态文化基础:农民和渔民比牧民更具整体性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jun 24;105(25):8552-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803874105. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
4
Culture sculpts the perceptual brain.文化塑造感知大脑。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;178:95-111. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17807-X.
5
Culture and the physical environment. Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances.文化与自然环境。整体与分析性的感知可供性。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Feb;17(2):113-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01673.x.
6
The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception.文化的影响:整体观与分析性认知
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Oct;9(10):467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.004.
7
Cultural adaptation of visual attention: calibration of the oculomotor control system in accordance with cultural scenes.文化适应的视觉注意:眼球运动控制系统与文化场景相协调。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050282. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
8
Culture and aesthetic preference: comparing the attention to context of East Asians and Americans.文化与审美偏好:比较东亚人和美国人对背景的关注
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Sep;34(9):1260-75. doi: 10.1177/0146167208320555.
9
Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception.场景感知过程中眼动的文化差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 30;102(35):12629-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506162102. Epub 2005 Aug 22.
10
Culture-related differences in default network activity during visuo-spatial judgments.文化差异对视觉空间判断中默认网络活动的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Feb;8(2):134-42. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr077. Epub 2011 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-cultural differences in visual object and background processing in the infant brain.婴儿大脑中视觉物体与背景处理的跨文化差异。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2023 Dec 13;1. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00038. eCollection 2023.
2
Cross-cultural analysis of eye-movement patterns in visual scene perception: a comparison of seven cultural samples.视觉场景感知中眼动模式的跨文化分析:七个文化样本的比较
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28574. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12724-x.
3
Social mobility beliefs moderate links between SSS, attributions for wealth and poverty, and aggression.社会流动信念调节了社会经济地位、对贫富的归因与攻击性之间的联系。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 23;13(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03138-5.
4
Visual short-term memory, culture, and image structure.视觉短期记忆、文化与图像结构。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03094-7.
5
Loneliness and cardiovascular disease incidence: two cohorts of older adults in the USA and South Korea.孤独与心血管疾病发病率:美国和韩国的两组老年人队列研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 12;54(3). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaf050.
6
The development of visual attention to the Ebbinghaus illusion across two cultures.两种文化中对艾宾浩斯错觉视觉注意力的发展。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 27;15(1):7008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90268-w.
7
Cultural Differences in Visual Attention Emerge in Infancy.视觉注意力方面的文化差异在婴儿期就已出现。
Infancy. 2025 Jan-Feb;30(1):e12651. doi: 10.1111/infa.12651.
8
Culturally-aligned clinical leadership competencies for effective teamwork in Japanese healthcare.日本医疗保健中以文化为导向的临床领导力能力,以实现有效的团队合作。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):1315. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06272-7.
9
Psychophysiological distinctions in emotional responding: sensitivity to perceiving loss of connection.情绪反应中的心理生理差异:对感知到的联系丧失的敏感性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Sep 9;18:1363546. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1363546. eCollection 2024.
10
Emotional palette: a computational mapping of aesthetic experiences evoked by visual art.情感调色板:通过视觉艺术唤起的审美体验的计算映射。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19932. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69686-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Change blindness.变化盲视。
Trends Cogn Sci. 1997 Oct;1(7):261-7. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01080-2.
2
Culture, education, and the attribution of physical causality.文化、教育与身体因果关系的归因
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Oct;29(10):1272-84. doi: 10.1177/0146167203254601.
3
Conversing across cultures: East-West communication styles in work and nonwork contexts.跨文化交流:工作与非工作情境中的东西方沟通方式。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):363-72. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.363.
4
Culture, change, and prediction.文化、变革与预测。
Psychol Sci. 2001 Nov;12(6):450-6. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00384.
5
Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans.整体式参与与分析式参与:比较日本人和美国人对情境的敏感度
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):922-34. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.922.
6
Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition.文化与思维体系:整体认知与分析认知
Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):291-310. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291.
7
Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment.环境中人际关系的文化、控制与认知。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 May;78(5):943-55. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.943.
8
Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers' speech to infants.日本和美国母亲对婴儿讲话中的共同主题和文化差异。
Child Dev. 1993 Jun;64(3):637-56.

文化与观点。

Culture and point of view.

作者信息

Nisbett Richard E, Masuda Takahiko

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16;100(19):11163-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1934527100. Epub 2003 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1934527100
PMID:12960375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC196945/
Abstract

East Asians and Westerners perceive the world and think about it in very different ways. Westerners are inclined to attend to some focal object, analyzing its attributes and categorizing it in an effort to find out what rules govern its behavior. Rules used include formal logic. Causal attributions tend to focus exclusively on the object and are therefore often mistaken. East Asians are more likely to attend to a broad perceptual and conceptual field, noticing relationships and changes and grouping objects based on family resemblance rather than category membership. Causal attributions emphasize the context. Social factors are likely to be important in directing attention. East Asians live in complex social networks with prescribed role relations. Attention to context is important to effective functioning. More independent Westerners live in less constraining social worlds and have the luxury of attending to the object and their goals with respect to it. The physical "affordances" of the environment may also influence perception. The built environments of the East are more complex and contain more objects than do those of the West. In addition, artistic products of the East emphasize the field and deemphasize individual objects, including people. Western art renders less of the field and emphasizes individual objects and people.

摘要

东亚人和西方人对世界的认知和思考方式截然不同。西方人倾向于关注某个焦点物体,分析其属性并进行分类,试图找出支配其行为的规则。所使用的规则包括形式逻辑。因果归因往往只专注于物体,因此常常出错。东亚人更有可能关注一个广阔的感知和概念领域,注意到其中的关系和变化,并根据家族相似性而非类别归属对物体进行归类。因果归因强调背景。社会因素在引导注意力方面可能很重要。东亚人生活在有着既定角色关系的复杂社会网络中。关注背景对于有效运作很重要。更为独立的西方人生活在限制较少的社会环境中,能够奢侈地关注物体以及他们与物体相关的目标。环境的物理“可供性”也可能影响感知。东方的建筑环境比西方的更复杂,包含的物体也更多。此外,东方的艺术作品强调领域而淡化单个物体,包括人。西方艺术展现的领域较少,强调单个物体和人。