• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较分析用于血管内动脉瘤修复的芭蕾舞型和传统支架移植物构型:CFD 分析。

Comparative evaluation of ballet-type and conventional stent graft configurations for endovascular aneurysm repair: A CFD analysis.

机构信息

School of Mechanical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.

Division of Vascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2021;78(1):1-27. doi: 10.3233/CH-200996.

DOI:10.3233/CH-200996
PMID:33459700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8293652/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Cross limb stent graft (SG) configuration technique for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is employed for splayed aortic bifurcations to avoid device kinking and smoothen cannulation. The present study investigates three types of stent graft (SG) configurations for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in abdominal aortic aneurysm. A computational fluid dynamic analysis was performed on the pulsatile non-Newtonian flow characteristics in three ideally modeled geometries of abdominal aortic (AA) SG configurations.

METHODS

The three planar and crosslimb SG configurations were ideally modeled, namely, top-down nonballet-type, top-down ballet-type, and bottom-up nonballet-type configurations. In top-down SG configuration, most of the device is deployed in the main body in the vicinity of renal artery and the limbs are extended to the iliac artery. While in the bottom-up configuration, some of the SG device is deployed in the main body, the limbs are deployed in aortic bifurcation, and the extra stent graft of the main body is extended to the proximal aorta until the below of the renal artery. The effects of non-Newtonian pulsatile flow on the wall stresses and flow patterns of the three models were investigated and compared. Moreover, the average wall shear stress (AWSS), oscillatory shear stress index (OSI), absolute helicity, pressure distribution, graft displacement and flow visualization plots were analyzed.

RESULTS

The top-down ballet-type showed less branch blockage effect than the top-down nonballet-type models. Furthermore, the top-down ballet-type configuration showed an increased tendency to sustain high WSS and higher helicity characteristics than that of the bottom-up and top-down non-ballet type configurations. However, displacement forces of the top-down ballet-type configuration were 40% and 9.6% higher than those of the bottom-up and top-down nonballet-type configurations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Some complications such as graft tearing, thrombus formation, limb disconnection during long term follow up periods might be relevant to hemodynamic characteristics according to the configurations of EVAR. Hence, the reported data required to be validated with the clinical results.

摘要

目的

交叉支 SG 构型技术用于分叉部位主动脉瘤腔内修复术(EVAR),以避免移植物扭结和使吻合更顺畅。本研究探讨了三种用于腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术(EVAR)的 SG 构型。对三种理想的腹主动脉(AA)SG 构型的脉动非牛顿流特性进行了计算流体动力学分析。

方法

理想地构建了三种平面和交叉支 SG 构型,即自上而下非芭蕾型、自上而下芭蕾型和自下而上非芭蕾型构型。在自上而下的 SG 构型中,大部分装置部署在靠近肾动脉的主体附近,支腿延伸到髂动脉。而在自下而上的构型中,部分 SG 装置部署在主体内,支腿部署在主动脉分叉处,主体的额外支架延伸到近端主动脉,直到肾动脉下方。研究并比较了非牛顿脉动流对三种模型壁面应力和流型的影响。此外,还分析了平均壁面剪切应力(AWSS)、振荡剪切应力指数(OSI)、绝对螺旋度、压力分布、移植物位移和流可视化图。

结果

自上而下的芭蕾型比自上而下的非芭蕾型模型的分支阻塞效应更小。此外,与自下而上和自上而下的非芭蕾型构型相比,自上而下的芭蕾型构型具有维持高 WSS 和更高螺旋度特性的趋势。然而,自上而下的芭蕾型构型的位移力比自下而上和自上而下的非芭蕾型构型分别高出 40%和 9.6%。

结论

根据 EVAR 的构型,一些并发症,如移植物撕裂、血栓形成、长期随访期间支腿分离等,可能与血流动力学特征有关。因此,需要将报告的数据与临床结果进行验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/bde13eb091f3/ch-78-ch200996-g009b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/244d616287e7/ch-78-ch200996-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/f349388d0638/ch-78-ch200996-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/b4e311a6865e/ch-78-ch200996-g001b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/c50223cd7454/ch-78-ch200996-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/aa75e92db3c8/ch-78-ch200996-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/88bf47a9846a/ch-78-ch200996-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/1970f86afe0c/ch-78-ch200996-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/361565f5020b/ch-78-ch200996-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/d252000cf594/ch-78-ch200996-g007a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/5e2388755079/ch-78-ch200996-g010a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/0428e2a8f318/ch-78-ch200996-g010b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/4b6db871397b/ch-78-ch200996-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/00004cf6ba33/ch-78-ch200996-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/e49d08e7c3cb/ch-78-ch200996-g007b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/2e5332a68f36/ch-78-ch200996-g007c.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/f807f678919c/ch-78-ch200996-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/194df5a2698b/ch-78-ch200996-g008b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/bb388d69580b/ch-78-ch200996-g008c.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/19caaf6f6641/ch-78-ch200996-g009a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/bde13eb091f3/ch-78-ch200996-g009b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/244d616287e7/ch-78-ch200996-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/f349388d0638/ch-78-ch200996-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/b4e311a6865e/ch-78-ch200996-g001b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/c50223cd7454/ch-78-ch200996-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/aa75e92db3c8/ch-78-ch200996-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/88bf47a9846a/ch-78-ch200996-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/1970f86afe0c/ch-78-ch200996-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/361565f5020b/ch-78-ch200996-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/d252000cf594/ch-78-ch200996-g007a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/5e2388755079/ch-78-ch200996-g010a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/0428e2a8f318/ch-78-ch200996-g010b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/4b6db871397b/ch-78-ch200996-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/00004cf6ba33/ch-78-ch200996-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/e49d08e7c3cb/ch-78-ch200996-g007b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/2e5332a68f36/ch-78-ch200996-g007c.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/f807f678919c/ch-78-ch200996-g008a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/194df5a2698b/ch-78-ch200996-g008b.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/bb388d69580b/ch-78-ch200996-g008c.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/19caaf6f6641/ch-78-ch200996-g009a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f972/8293652/bde13eb091f3/ch-78-ch200996-g009b.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of ballet-type and conventional stent graft configurations for endovascular aneurysm repair: A CFD analysis.比较分析用于血管内动脉瘤修复的芭蕾舞型和传统支架移植物构型:CFD 分析。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2021;78(1):1-27. doi: 10.3233/CH-200996.
2
Computational fluid dynamics evaluation of the cross-limb stent graft configuration for endovascular aneurysm repair.用于血管内动脉瘤修复的交叉肢体支架移植物构型的计算流体动力学评估
J Biomech Eng. 2012 Dec;134(12):121002. doi: 10.1115/1.4007950.
3
A hemodynamic study of blood flow models on various stent graft configurations during aorto-iliac reconstruction.血流模型在腹主动脉-髂动脉重建中不同支架移植物构型中的血液动力学研究。
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2024;87(2):199-219. doi: 10.3233/CH-232058.
4
Flow and wall shear stress characterization after endovascular aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm sealing in an infrarenal aneurysm model.肾下腹主动脉瘤模型中血管内动脉瘤修复术和血管内动脉瘤封堵术后的血流及壁面剪应力特征
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1844-1853. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.077. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
5
Retrograde branched extension limb assembling stent of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm: A longitudinal hemodynamic analysis for stent graft migration.腹主动脉瘤肾周分支型腔内移植物的逆行分支延伸支:移植物移位的纵向血流动力学分析。
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2020 Nov;36(11):e3394. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3394. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
6
Impact of Cross-Limb Stent-Graft Configuration on Hemodynamics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Interventional Therapy.交叉支移植物构型对腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗血流动力学的影响。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2024 Apr;15(2):137-146. doi: 10.1007/s13239-023-00702-1. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
7
Computational Comparison Between a Classic Bifurcated Endograft and a Customized Model With "Dog Bone"-Shaped Limbs.经典分叉型血管内移植物与“狗骨”型分支血管的定制模型的计算比较。
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Apr;26(2):250-257. doi: 10.1177/1526602819834713.
8
Predisposing Factors for Migration of the Iliac Limb and Reintervention after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后髂支移位及再次干预的相关因素
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;59:91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
9
Hemodynamics of different configurations of the left subclavian artery parallel stent graft for thoracic endovascular aortic repair.左锁骨下动脉不同构型平行支架移植物在胸主动脉腔内修复术中的血流动力学。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Nov;241:107741. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107741. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
10
Midterm outcomes and evolution of gutter area after endovascular aneurysm repair with the chimney graft procedure.血管内动脉瘤修复后烟囱技术的中期结果和 gutter 区的演变。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):104-112.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.067. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Endograft-specific hemodynamics after endovascular aneurysm repair: a CFD analysis.血管内动脉瘤修复术后移植物特异性血流动力学:一项计算流体动力学分析
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83148-2.
2
Stent-induced new entry and device migration associated with hemodynamic stress after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B chronic aortic dissection using computational fluid dynamics analysis: a case report.使用计算流体动力学分析评估B型慢性主动脉夹层腔内修复术后支架诱导的新破口及与血流动力学应力相关的器械移位:一例报告
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Cases. 2024 Feb 22;3(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s44215-024-00146-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Improved midterm outcomes after endovascular repair of nontraumatic descending thoracic aortic rupture compared with open surgery.血管内修复非创伤性降主动脉破裂与开放手术相比,中期结果改善。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jun;161(6):2004-2012. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.10.156. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
2
Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: From an Era of Revolution to an Era of Evolution.胸主动脉腹主动脉瘤修复:从革命时代到进化时代。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;31(4):703-707. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.05.039. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
3
Open and Endovascular Management of Aortic Aneurysms.
The impact of endovascular stents types on perioperative outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a single-center experience.
血管内支架类型对破裂腹主动脉瘤围手术期结局的影响:单中心经验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 13;11:1272389. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1272389. eCollection 2024.
4
Contralateral Snare Cannulation vs. Retrograde Gate Cannulation during Endovascular Aortic Repair in Difficult Iliac Artery Anatomy: A Single Center Experience.复杂髂动脉解剖结构下行血管腔内主动脉修复术时对侧圈套插管与逆行门插管的比较:单中心经验
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):175. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010175.
5
Impact of Cross-Limb Stent-Graft Configuration on Hemodynamics in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Interventional Therapy.交叉支移植物构型对腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗血流动力学的影响。
Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2024 Apr;15(2):137-146. doi: 10.1007/s13239-023-00702-1. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
6
DANCER: Study protocol of a prospective, non-randomized controlled trial for crossed limb versus standard limb configuration in endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.舞者:一项关于血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复术中交叉肢体与标准肢体配置的前瞻性、非随机对照试验的研究方案。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 9;9:1046200. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1046200. eCollection 2022.
7
and Haemodynamic Analyses of a Novel Embedded Iliac Branch Device.新型嵌入式髂支装置的血流动力学分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 5;9:828910. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.828910. eCollection 2022.
主动脉瘤的开放和腔内治疗。
Circ Res. 2019 Feb 15;124(4):647-661. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313186.
4
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
5
Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Hemodynamic Performance of Bifurcated Stent Grafts with Various Torsion Angles.分叉支架移植物不同扭转角度的血流动力学性能的数值与实验研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 22;8(1):12625. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31015-2.
6
Early and Mid-Term Results of Endovascular Aortic Repair Using a Crossed-Limb Technique for Patients with Severely Splayed Iliac Angulation.采用交叉肢体技术对严重髂血管成角患者进行血管腔内主动脉修复的早期和中期结果
Ann Vasc Dis. 2018 Mar 25;11(1):91-95. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.16-00135.
7
A Population-Based Study of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment in Finland 2000 to 2014.基于人群的芬兰 2000 至 2014 年腹主动脉瘤治疗研究。
Circulation. 2017 Oct 31;136(18):1726-1734. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028259. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
8
Computational fluid dynamics in abdominal aorta bifurcation: non-Newtonian versus Newtonian blood flow in a real case study.腹主动脉分叉处的计算流体动力学:真实案例研究中的非牛顿血流与牛顿血流
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017 Jun;20(8):822-831. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1302433. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
9
A computational assessment of the hemodynamic effects of crossed and non-crossed bifurcated stent-graft devices for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.用于治疗腹主动脉瘤的交叉和非交叉分叉支架型血管移植物血流动力学效应的计算评估。
Med Eng Phys. 2016 Dec;38(12):1458-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
10
A systematic review of computational fluid dynamics in type B aortic dissection.B型主动脉夹层中计算流体动力学的系统评价
Int J Cardiol. 2016 May 1;210:28-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.099. Epub 2016 Feb 17.