• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国癌症数据库对头颈部癌症立体定向体部放射治疗的分析。

A national cancer database analysis on stereotactic body radiation therapy of head and neck cancers.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mass. Eye and Ear, Mass. General Hospital, Boston Medical Center, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 May-Jun;42(3):102913. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102913. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102913
PMID:33460976
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate demographic, clinicopathological, treatment factors including biological effective radiation dose (BED) that influence overall survival in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2015, 591 SBRT-treated HNC patients were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. A BED using an alpha/beta ratio of 10 (BED), was used to compare dose fractionation of different SBRT regimens. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method, and log-rank tests were used to determine statistical significance. Cox regression modeling was used to compute crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 11.9 (interquartile range, 5.5 to 26.7) months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 15.5%. On multivariate analysis, older age, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score ≥ 1, history of cancer, tumor, nodal and metastatic stage, and receiving treatment at academic/research program were associated with poor survival. Compared to SBRT alone, superior survival was observed with SBRT with chemotherapy, surgery with SBRT, but not surgery with SBRT and chemotherapy. Improved survival was observed with aa BED of ≥59.5 Gy (adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.70, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Factors affecting associated with worse survival in HNC patients treated with SBRT included older age, patient comorbidities, advanced tumor stage, cancer history, and lower biological effective SBRT dose.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b (individual cohort study).

摘要

背景

评估人口统计学、临床病理学、治疗因素,包括影响立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)治疗的头颈部癌症(HNC)患者总生存率的生物有效辐射剂量(BED)。

方法

2004 年至 2015 年间,从国家癌症数据库中确定了 591 例接受 SBRT 治疗的 HNC 患者。采用α/β比为 10(BED)的 BED 来比较不同 SBRT 方案的剂量分割。使用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计总生存率,并使用对数秩检验确定统计学意义。使用 Cox 回归模型计算粗风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

中位随访时间为 11.9 个月(四分位距 5.5 至 26.7)。5 年总生存率为 15.5%。多因素分析显示,年龄较大、Charlson-Deyo 合并症评分≥1、癌症史、肿瘤、淋巴结和转移分期以及在学术/研究项目中接受治疗与生存率较差相关。与单纯 SBRT 相比,SBRT 联合化疗、SBRT 联合手术的生存率更高,但 SBRT 联合手术和化疗的生存率没有提高。BED 大于等于 59.5Gy 时观察到生存率改善(调整 HR 0.57,95%CI 0.46-0.70,P<0.0001)。

结论

影响 SBRT 治疗的 HNC 患者生存的因素包括年龄较大、患者合并症、晚期肿瘤分期、癌症史和较低的 SBRT 生物有效剂量。

证据水平

2b(个体队列研究)。

相似文献

1
A national cancer database analysis on stereotactic body radiation therapy of head and neck cancers.全国癌症数据库对头颈部癌症立体定向体部放射治疗的分析。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 May-Jun;42(3):102913. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.102913. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
Stereotactic body radiation therapy with higher biologically effective dose is associated with improved survival in stage II non-small cell lung cancer.立体定向体部放疗采用更高的生物有效剂量与提高 II 期非小细胞肺癌的生存率相关。
Lung Cancer. 2019 May;131:147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.03.031. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
3
The Effect of Biologically Effective Dose and Radiation Treatment Schedule on Overall Survival in Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.立体定向体部放疗治疗 I 期非小细胞肺癌患者的生物有效剂量和放疗方案对总生存期的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Dec 1;96(5):1011-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.033. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
4
Increasing radiation therapy dose is associated with improved survival in patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.立体定向体部放射治疗 I 期非小细胞肺癌患者,增加放射治疗剂量与生存改善相关。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Feb 1;91(2):344-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.10.002.
5
Stereotactic body radiation therapy for benign spine tumors: is dose de-escalation appropriate?立体定向体部放射治疗良性脊柱肿瘤:剂量降低是否合适?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Aug;29(2):220-225. doi: 10.3171/2017.12.SPINE17920. Epub 2018 May 25.
6
Definitive treatment patterns and survival in stage II non-small cell lung cancer.局限期 II 期非小细胞肺癌的明确治疗模式和生存情况。
Lung Cancer. 2018 Oct;124:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.035. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
7
Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.立体定向体部放疗与常规分割放疗治疗早期非小细胞肺癌的比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Nov;129(2):264-269. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
8
Re-irradiation stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional outcome analysis.脊柱转移瘤的再程立体定向体部放射治疗:多机构疗效分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Nov;25(5):646-653. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.SPINE151523. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Outcomes for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventionally fractionated radiation.接受立体定向体部放疗与常规分割放疗的局部晚期胰腺腺癌患者的治疗结果。
Cancer. 2017 Sep 15;123(18):3486-3493. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30706. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves local control and overall survival compared to conventionally fractionated radiation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)与常规分割放疗相比,可提高Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的局部控制率和总生存率。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Nov;57(11):1567-1573. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1481292. Epub 2018 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The immunogenic radiation and new players in immunotherapy and targeted therapy for head and neck cancer.头颈部癌免疫原性放疗以及免疫治疗和靶向治疗中的新参与者。
Front Oral Health. 2023 Jul 11;4:1180869. doi: 10.3389/froh.2023.1180869. eCollection 2023.