Suppr超能文献

不同居家和社区服务模式对养老院入住的影响:来自台湾的全国性数据。

The impact of different patterns of home- and community-based services on nursing home admission: National data from Taiwan.

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy and Management, National Taiwan University, Taiwan.

Department of Gerontology and Health Care Management, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113679. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113679. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study had two aims: (a) to identify the different patterns of use of home- and community-based services (HCBS) among older adults in Taiwan, and (b) to examine the effects of the different use patterns on HCBS recipients' use of institutional long-term care services.

METHODS

The study analyzed cohort data from Taiwan's first National 10-Year Long-Term Care Plan database and from National Health Insurance Claim Data. We extracted baseline information on older adults who were first evaluated for and prescribed HCBS from 2010 through 2013 (N = 71,260). We used latent class analysis to specify the underlying subgroups of recipients with similar patterns of HCBS use. We used hierarchical multinomial logistic regression to examine the effect of the different use patterns on the risk of institutional (e.g., nursing home) placement from 4 to 15 months after initial HCBS evaluation.

RESULTS

Four subgroups of HCBS recipients were identified, with patterns of home-based personal care (PC), home-based personal care and medical care (PC/MC), home-based medical care (MC), and community care services. Compared to the home-based PC/MC group, people in the home-based MC group had lower risk (OR = 0.54) and people in the community care group had higher risk (OR = 1.76) of admission to a nursing home.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings may provide insights for policy makers regarding the usefulness of integrating medical care and other types of long-term care services into adult day care.

摘要

背景

本研究有两个目的:(a) 确定台湾老年人家庭和社区服务(HCBS)的不同使用模式;(b) 研究不同使用模式对 HCBS 接受者使用机构长期护理服务的影响。

方法

本研究分析了来自台湾首个国家 10 年长期护理计划数据库和国家健康保险索赔数据的队列数据。我们提取了 2010 年至 2013 年首次评估和开处方 HCBS 的老年人的基线信息(N=71260)。我们使用潜在类别分析来指定具有相似 HCBS 使用模式的接受者的潜在亚组。我们使用分层多项逻辑回归来检验不同使用模式对初始 HCBS 评估后 4 至 15 个月机构(如疗养院)安置风险的影响。

结果

确定了四个 HCBS 接受者亚组,其模式分别为家庭基础个人护理(PC)、家庭基础个人护理和医疗护理(PC/MC)、家庭基础医疗护理(MC)和社区护理服务。与家庭基础 PC/MC 组相比,家庭基础 MC 组的入院风险较低(OR=0.54),社区护理组的入院风险较高(OR=1.76)。

结论

研究结果可能为决策者提供有关将医疗保健和其他类型的长期护理服务整合到成人日间护理中的有用性的见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验