Suppr超能文献

医疗保险居家和社区长期服务在双重资格人群中的护理院护理的结果。

Outcomes of Medicaid home- and community-based long-term services relative to nursing home care among dual eligibles.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55(6):973-982. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13573.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide the first plausibly causal national estimates of health outcomes for older dual-eligible recipients of Medicaid HCBS relative to nursing home care and to explore possible mechanisms for the effect.

DATA SOURCES

We use 2005 and 2012 Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX), a national compilation of Medicaid claims, merged with Medicare claims to identify hospital admissions, our main outcome variable.

STUDY DESIGN

We model the effects of HCBS using a longitudinal instrumental variables framework. To address the endogeneity of HCBS receipt, we instrument for it using the county percentage of nonelderly long-term care users who receive HCBS. The percentage of nonelderly users is highly predictive of HCBS use for an elderly beneficiary, but because the instrument was derived from a separate population, the exclusion restriction is unlikely to be violated.

POPULATION STUDIED

1,312,498 older adults (65+) dually enrolled in Medicaid and Medicare and are using long-term care. We also examine heterogeneity of effects by race/ethnicity and the presence of dementia.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

HCBS users have 10 percentage points higher (P < .01) annual rates of hospitalization than their nursing home counterparts when selection bias is addressed; rates of potentially avoidable hospitalizations are 3 percentage points higher (P < .01). These differences persist across races, dementia status, and intensity of HCBS spending.

CONCLUSIONS

Shifting Medicaid long-term care funding for older adults from nursing homes to HCBS, while well-motivated, results in the unintended consequence of substantially higher hospitalization rates for older dual eligibles. The quality and/or quantity of services may be inadequate for some HCBS recipients. Hospitalizations are costly to Medicare but also to the HCBS recipient in terms of stress and risks. Although consumer preferences to remain at home may outweigh poor outcomes of HCBS, the full costs and benefits need to be considered. HCBS outcomes-not just expansion-need more attention.

摘要

目的

提供第一个关于医疗补助 HCBS 对老年双重资格获得者健康结果的合理因果性全国估计数,与疗养院护理相比,并探讨这种影响的可能机制。

数据来源

我们使用 2005 年和 2012 年的医疗补助分析提取(MAX),这是一个全国性的医疗补助索赔汇编,与医疗保险索赔合并,以确定我们的主要结果变量——住院。

研究设计

我们使用纵向工具变量框架来模拟 HCBS 的效果。为了解决 HCBS 接受的内生性问题,我们使用该县非老年长期护理使用者接受 HCBS 的百分比作为其工具变量。非老年使用者的百分比高度预测了老年受益人的 HCBS 使用,但由于该工具是从单独的人群中得出的,因此排除限制不太可能被违反。

研究人群

1312498 名年龄在 65 岁以上的老年人(双重注册)同时参加了医疗补助和医疗保险,并正在使用长期护理。我们还根据种族/族裔和痴呆症的存在,检查了效果的异质性。

主要发现

在解决选择偏差问题后,HCBS 用户的年住院率比疗养院的同龄人高 10 个百分点(P<.01);潜在可避免的住院率高 3 个百分点(P<.01)。这些差异在各种种族、痴呆症状况和 HCBS 支出强度下都存在。

结论

将医疗补助老年人长期护理资金从疗养院转移到 HCBS,虽然动机良好,但却导致老年双重资格获得者的住院率大幅上升,这是一个意想不到的后果。对于一些 HCBS 接受者来说,服务的质量和/或数量可能不足。住院对医疗保险来说是昂贵的,但对 HCBS 接受者来说,也是压力和风险的来源。尽管消费者保持在家的偏好可能超过 HCBS 的不良结果,但需要考虑全部成本和收益。HCBS 的结果——不仅仅是扩张——需要更多的关注。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验