Suppr超能文献

患者隐私与临床研究的相互矛盾的需求。

The Competing Demands of Patient Privacy and Clinical Research.

机构信息

Lillian S. Brunner Chair and a professor of bioethics and nursing in the School of Nursing at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.

Chief of the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.

出版信息

Ethics Hum Res. 2021 Jan;43(1):25-31. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500076.

Abstract

Privacy and confidentiality of personal medical information are cornerstones of ethical clinical care and ethical research. But real-world research has challenged traditional ways of thinking about privacy and confidentiality of information. In today's world of "big data" and learning health care systems, researchers and others are combining multiple sources of information to address complex problems. We present a case study that highlights the ethical concerns that arise when a patient who is employed by an academic medical center learns through a research invitational letter that her private information was accessed at this center without her consent. We discuss the ethical challenges of balancing patient privacy with advancing clinical research and ask, what level of privacy and confidentiality can and should patients expect from their clinician providers, fellow research colleagues, and institutions?

摘要

个人医疗信息的隐私和保密性是伦理临床护理和伦理研究的基石。但现实世界的研究挑战了传统的信息隐私和保密性观念。在当今的“大数据”和学习型医疗保健系统世界中,研究人员和其他人员正在将多种信息来源结合起来,以解决复杂的问题。我们提出了一个案例研究,强调了当一名在学术医疗中心工作的患者通过研究邀请函得知她的私人信息未经她同意就被访问时所产生的伦理问题。我们讨论了在平衡患者隐私与推进临床研究方面所面临的伦理挑战,并提出,患者可以并且应该期望他们的临床医生、研究同事和机构提供什么样的隐私和保密性?

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验