Suppr超能文献

无同意数据密集型健康研究的具体措施:软性法律文书和学术文献的系统综述。

Specific measures for data-intensive health research without consent: a systematic review of soft law instruments and academic literature.

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;32(1):21-30. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01471-0. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

Abstract

It is a common misunderstanding of current European data protection law that when consent is not being used as lawful basis, the processing of personal data is prohibited. Article 9(2)(j) of the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) permits Member States to establish a legal basis in national law that allows for the processing of personal data for scientific research purposes without consent. However, the European legislator has formulated this "research exemption" as an opening clause, rendering the GDPR not specific as to what measures exactly are required to comply with the research exemption. This may have significant implications for both the protection of personal data and the advancement of data-intensive health research. We performed a systematic review of relevant soft law instruments and academic literature to identify what measures are mentioned in those documents. Our analysis resulted in the identification of four overarching themes of suggested measures: organizational measures; technical measures; oversight and review mechanisms; and public engagement and participation. Some of the suggested measures do not substantially contribute to the clarification of the GDPR's "suitable and specific measures" requirement because they remain vague or broad in nature and encompass all types of data processing. However, the themes oversight and review mechanisms and public engagement and participation provide valuable insights which can be put to practice. Nevertheless, further clarification of the measures and safeguards that should be installed when invoking the research exemption remains necessary.

摘要

当前,人们普遍对欧洲数据保护法存在误解,即认为在不使用同意作为合法依据的情况下,禁止处理个人数据。《欧盟一般数据保护条例》(GDPR)第 9 条第 2 款第(j)项允许成员国在国家法律中建立合法依据,允许在没有同意的情况下出于科研目的处理个人数据。然而,欧洲立法者将这条“研究豁免”表述为一个开放条款,这使得 GDPR 对于符合研究豁免需要采取哪些具体措施并未作出明确规定。这可能对个人数据保护和以数据为中心的健康研究的发展产生重大影响。我们对相关的软法律文书和学术文献进行了系统的回顾,以确定这些文件中提到了哪些措施。我们的分析确定了四项建议措施的总体主题:组织措施;技术措施;监督和审查机制;以及公众参与。其中一些建议措施并没有实质性地促进 GDPR 对“适当和具体措施”要求的澄清,因为它们仍然模糊或宽泛,涵盖了所有类型的数据处理。然而,监督和审查机制以及公众参与和参与这两个主题提供了有价值的见解,可以付诸实践。然而,在援引研究豁免时,仍有必要进一步澄清应安装的措施和保障措施。

相似文献

5
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

7
Health Research, Consent and the GDPR Exemption.健康研究、同意与《通用数据保护条例》豁免
Eur J Health Law. 2019 Apr 24;26(2):97-119. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12262427.
10
Privacy in the age of medical big data.医疗大数据时代的隐私问题。
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):37-43. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0272-7. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验