Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China AND Medical Biology Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Dec 19;19(6):557-569. doi: 10.18502/ijaai.v19i6.4926.
Several reports have determined that changes in white blood cell counts and inflammatory biomarkers are related to disease outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and they can be utilized as prognostic biomarkers. For introducing a factor as a diagnostic/prognostic biomarker, diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic review and meta-analysis are recommended. For the first time, we aimed to determine the accuracies of white blood cell counts and inflammatory biomarkers for prognosis of COVID-19 patient's outcome by a DTA meta-analysis. Until August24, 2020, we searched Web of Sciences, Scopus, and MEDLINE/PubMed databases to achieve related papers. Summary points and lines of included studies were calculated from 2×2 tables by bivariate/hierarchical models. Critical condition and mortality were considered as outcomes. A total of 13387 patients from 28 studies were included in this study. Six biomarkers containing leukocytosis, neutrophilia, lymphopenia, increased level of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin (PCT), and ferritin met the inclusion criteria. Analysis of the area under the curve (AUCHSROC) indicated that the PCT was the only applicable prognostic biomarker for critical condition and mortality (AUCHSROC=0.80 for both conditions). Pooled-diagnostic odds ratios were 6.78 (95% CI, 3.65-12.61) for prognosis of critical condition and 13.21 (95% CI, 3.95-44.19) for mortality. Other biomarkers had insufficient accuracies for both conditions (AUCHSROC< 0.80). Among evaluated biomarkers, only PCT has good accuracy for the prognosis of both critical condition and mortality in COVID-19 and it can be considered as a single prognostic biomarker for poor outcomes. Also, PCT has more accuracy for the prognosis of mortality in comparison to critical condition.
有几项报告已经确定,白细胞计数和炎症生物标志物的变化与 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的疾病结果有关,它们可以用作预后生物标志物。为了将某个因素作为诊断/预后生物标志物引入,推荐进行诊断测试准确性(DTA)系统评价和荟萃分析。这是我们首次通过 DTA 荟萃分析来确定白细胞计数和炎症生物标志物对 COVID-19 患者预后的准确性。截至 2020 年 8 月 24 日,我们在 Web of Sciences、Scopus 和 MEDLINE/PubMed 数据库中搜索相关文献。通过双变量/分层模型从纳入研究的 2×2 表中计算汇总点和汇总线。将危急情况和死亡率视为结局。这项研究共纳入了 28 项研究的 13387 名患者。包含白细胞增多、中性粒细胞增多、淋巴细胞减少、C 反应蛋白水平升高、降钙素原(PCT)和铁蛋白升高的 6 种生物标志物符合纳入标准。曲线下面积(AUCHSROC)分析表明,PCT 是唯一适用于危急情况和死亡率的预后生物标志物(两种情况的 AUCCHROC 均为 0.80)。合并诊断优势比分别为 6.78(95%CI,3.65-12.61)和 13.21(95%CI,3.95-44.19)。其他生物标志物在两种情况下的准确性都不足(AUCHSROC<0.80)。在评估的生物标志物中,只有 PCT 对 COVID-19 的危急情况和死亡率的预后具有较好的准确性,可被视为不良结局的单一预后生物标志物。此外,PCT 对死亡率的预后准确性高于危急情况。