• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰隐孢子虫病病例的地理编码(2008-2017 年)——开发可靠、可重复的多阶段地理编码方法。

Geocoding cryptosporidiosis cases in Ireland (2008-2017)-development of a reliable, reproducible, multiphase geocoding methodology.

机构信息

European Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (EPIET), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Stockholm, Sweden.

Health Service Executive-Health Protection Surveillance Centre, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Nov;190(4):1497-1507. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02468-0. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-020-02468-0
PMID:33464478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7813664/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Geocoding (the process of converting a text address into spatial data) quality may affect geospatial epidemiological study findings. No national standards for best geocoding practice exist in Ireland. Irish postcodes (Eircodes) are not routinely recorded for infectious disease notifications and > 35% of dwellings have non-unique addresses. This may result in incomplete geocoding and introduce systematic errors into studies.

AIMS

This study aimed to develop a reliable and reproducible methodology to geocode cryptosporidiosis notifications to fine-resolution spatial units (Census 2016 Small Areas), to enhance data validity and completeness, thus improving geospatial epidemiological studies.

METHODS

A protocol was devised to utilise geocoding tools developed by the Health Service Executive's Health Intelligence Unit. Geocoding employed finite-string automated and manual matching, undertaken sequentially in three additive phases. The protocol was applied to a cryptosporidiosis notification dataset (2008-2017) from Ireland's Computerised Infectious Disease Reporting System. Outputs were validated against devised criteria.

RESULTS

Overall, 92.1% (4266/4633) of cases were successfully geocoded to one Small Area, and 95.5% (n = 4425) to larger spatial units. The proportion of records geocoded increased by 14% using the multiphase approach, with 5% of records re-assigned to a different spatial unit.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed multiphase protocol improved the completeness and validity of geocoding, thus increasing the power of subsequent studies. The authors recommend capturing Eircodes ideally using application programming interface for infectious disease or other health-related datasets, for more efficient and reliable geocoding. Where Eircodes are not recorded/available, for best geocoding practice, we recommend this (or a similar) quality driven protocol.

摘要

背景

地理编码(将文本地址转换为空间数据的过程)的质量可能会影响地理空间流行病学研究的结果。爱尔兰没有关于最佳地理编码实践的国家标准。爱尔兰邮政编码(Eircodes)并未常规记录在传染病报告中,超过 35%的住宅具有非唯一地址。这可能导致地理编码不完整,并在研究中引入系统误差。

目的

本研究旨在开发一种可靠且可重复的方法,将隐孢子虫病通知地理编码到精细分辨率的空间单位(2016 年人口普查小区域),以提高数据的有效性和完整性,从而改善地理空间流行病学研究。

方法

制定了一项协议,利用爱尔兰卫生服务执行局卫生情报股开发的地理编码工具。地理编码采用有限字符串自动和手动匹配,分三个附加阶段顺序进行。该协议应用于来自爱尔兰计算机化传染病报告系统的隐孢子虫病通知数据集(2008-2017 年)。根据制定的标准对输出进行验证。

结果

总体而言,92.1%(4266/4633)的病例成功地理编码到一个小区域,95.5%(n=4425)的病例地理编码到更大的空间单位。使用多阶段方法,记录的地理编码比例增加了 14%,有 5%的记录被重新分配到不同的空间单位。

结论

开发的多阶段协议提高了地理编码的完整性和有效性,从而提高了后续研究的效力。作者建议理想情况下使用应用程序编程接口为传染病或其他健康相关数据集捕获 Eircodes,以实现更高效和可靠的地理编码。在未记录/不可用 Eircodes 的情况下,为了最佳的地理编码实践,我们建议使用这种(或类似的)质量驱动的协议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/784d/8519891/6ba7e05b2ebb/11845_2020_2468_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/784d/8519891/3814212a4fde/11845_2020_2468_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/784d/8519891/6ba7e05b2ebb/11845_2020_2468_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/784d/8519891/3814212a4fde/11845_2020_2468_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/784d/8519891/6ba7e05b2ebb/11845_2020_2468_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Geocoding cryptosporidiosis cases in Ireland (2008-2017)-development of a reliable, reproducible, multiphase geocoding methodology.爱尔兰隐孢子虫病病例的地理编码(2008-2017 年)——开发可靠、可重复的多阶段地理编码方法。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 Nov;190(4):1497-1507. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02468-0. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.地理编码错误、空间不确定性及其对暴露评估和环境流行病学的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 12;17(16):5845. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165845.
3
Improving geocoding matching rates of structured addresses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.提高巴西里约热内卢结构化地址的地理编码匹配率。
Cad Saude Publica. 2021 Jul 28;37(7):e00039321. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00039321. eCollection 2021.
4
[Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].谁命中目标?谷歌与开放街道地图免费地理编码服务的比较研究
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Sep;77(8-9):e160-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1549939. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
5
Methods for retrospective geocoding in population studies: the Jackson Heart Study.人群研究中回顾性地理编码的方法:杰克逊心脏研究。
J Urban Health. 2010 Jan;87(1):136-50. doi: 10.1007/s11524-009-9403-2.
6
Spatial Errors in Automated Geocoding of Incident Locations in Australian Suicide Mortality Data.澳大利亚自杀死亡率数据中事件地点自动地理编码的空间误差。
Epidemiology. 2021 Nov 1;32(6):896-903. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001403.
7
Smartphone-assisted spatial data collection improves geographic information quality: pilot study using a birth records dataset.智能手机辅助空间数据收集可提高地理信息质量:使用出生记录数据集的试点研究
Geospat Health. 2016 Nov 23;11(3):482. doi: 10.4081/gh.2016.482.
8
Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?比较单阶段地理编码方法与多阶段地理编码方法:它们在多大程度上以及在哪些方面存在差异?
Int J Health Geogr. 2007 Mar 16;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-6-12.
9
Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.两种地理编码方法在基于地理信息系统的流行病学研究暴露评估中的准确性
Environ Health. 2017 Feb 24;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0217-5.
10
A multifaceted comparison of ArcGIS and MapMarker for automated geocoding.ArcGIS与MapMarker用于自动地理编码的多方面比较。
Geospat Health. 2012 Nov;7(1):145-51. doi: 10.4081/gh.2012.113.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of the 2018 European summer heatwave on the incidence of sporadic bacterial gastroenteritis in a temperate maritime climate region (Republic of Ireland).2018年欧洲夏季热浪对温带海洋性气候地区(爱尔兰共和国)散发性细菌性肠胃炎发病率的影响
One Health. 2025 Jun 10;20:101105. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2025.101105. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
An ecological study of the spatiotemporal dynamics and drivers of domestically acquired campylobacteriosis in Ireland, 2011-2018.爱尔兰 2011-2018 年本地感染弯曲杆菌病的时空动态及其驱动因素的生态研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 17;18(11):e0291739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291739. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Spatial analysis and GIS in the study of COVID-19. A review.空间分析和 GIS 在 COVID-19 研究中的应用。综述。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 15;739:140033. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140033. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
2
Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli incidence is related to small area variation in cattle density in a region in Ireland.在爱尔兰的一个地区,志贺毒素产生型大肠杆菌的发病率与牛密度的小面积变化有关。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Oct 1;637-638:865-870. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.038. Epub 2018 May 12.
3
Big Data in Public Health: Terminology, Machine Learning, and Privacy.
Spatio-temporal evolution of COVID-19 in the Republic of Ireland and the Greater Dublin Area (March to November 2020): A space-time cluster frequency approach.
爱尔兰共和国及都柏林大区2019冠状病毒病的时空演变(2020年3月至11月):一种时空聚集频率方法
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;45:100565. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2023.100565. Epub 2023 Jan 15.
4
Modelling COVID-19 severity in the Republic of Ireland using patient co-morbidities, socioeconomic profile and geographic location, February to November 2020.利用患者合并症、社会经济状况和地理位置对 2020 年 2 月至 11 月爱尔兰共和国的 COVID-19 严重程度进行建模。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 16;11(1):18474. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98008-6.
5
Breakpoint modelling of temporal associations between non-pharmaceutical interventions and symptomatic COVID-19 incidence in the Republic of Ireland.爱尔兰共和国非药物干预措施与有症状 COVID-19 发病率之间的时间关联的断点建模。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0255254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255254. eCollection 2021.
大数据在公共卫生中的应用:术语、机器学习和隐私
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:95-112. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014208. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
4
An analysis of the process and results of manual geocode correction.手工地理编码校正的过程与结果分析
Geospat Health. 2017 May 11;12(1):526. doi: 10.4081/gh.2017.526.
5
A geostatistical investigation of agricultural and infrastructural risk factors associated with primary verotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC) infection in the Republic of Ireland, 2008-2013.2008 - 2013年爱尔兰共和国与原发性产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(VTEC)感染相关的农业和基础设施风险因素的地质统计学调查。
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Jan;145(1):95-105. doi: 10.1017/S095026881600193X. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
6
A spatial analysis of private well water Escherichia coli contamination in southern Ontario.安大略省南部私人井水大肠杆菌污染的空间分析。
Geospat Health. 2013 Nov;8(1):65-75. doi: 10.4081/gh.2013.55.
7
Residential address errors in public health surveillance data: a description and analysis of the impact on geocoding.公共卫生监测数据中的居住地址错误:对地理编码影响的描述与分析
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;1(2-3):163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
8
Spatial and temporal epidemiology of sporadic human cryptosporidiosis in Scotland.苏格兰散发性隐孢子虫病的时空流行病学。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2010 Dec;57(7-8):487-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01247.x.
9
Epidemiology of human cryptosporidiosis in Ireland, 2004-2006: analysis of national notification data.2004 - 2006年爱尔兰人体隐孢子虫病流行病学:国家通报数据分析
Euro Surveill. 2009 Feb 26;14(8):19128.
10
The prevalence of Cryptosporidium species and subtypes in human faecal samples in Ireland.爱尔兰人类粪便样本中隐孢子虫种类和亚型的流行情况。
Epidemiol Infect. 2009 Feb;137(2):270-7. doi: 10.1017/S0950268808000769. Epub 2008 May 12.