• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

污染环境下使用合成补片进行腹疝修补术:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh in a contaminated field: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):1035-1050. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02358-5. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-020-02358-5
PMID:33464537
Abstract

PURPOSE

The use of mesh in ventral hernia repair becomes especially challenging when associated with a contaminated field. Permanent synthetic mesh use in this setting is currently debated and this discussion is yet to be resolved clinically or in the literature. We aim to systematically assess postoperative outcomes of non-absorbable synthetic mesh (NASM) used in ventral hernia repair in the setting of contamination.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cinahl, and Cochrane Library identified all articles from 2000-2020 that examined the use of NASM for ventral hernia repair in a contaminated field. Postoperative outcomes were assessed by means of pooled analysis and meta-analysis. Qualitative analysis was completed for all included studies using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Of 630 distinct publications and 104 requiring full review, this study included 17 articles published between 2007 and 2020. Meta-analysis demonstrated absorbable mesh was associated with more HR (OR 1.89, 1.15-3.12, p = 0.008), SSO (OR 1.43, 0.96-2.11, p = 0.087), SSI (OR 2.84, 1.85-4.35, p < 0.001), and unplanned reoperation (OR 1.99, 1.19-3.32, p = 0.009) compared to NASM.

CONCLUSION

The use of NASM for ventral hernia repair in a contaminated field may be a safe alternative to absorbable mesh, as evidenced by lower rates of postoperative complications. This review counters the current clinical paradigm, and additional prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted.

摘要

目的

当与污染区域相关时,网片在腹疝修复中的使用变得极具挑战性。在这种情况下,永久性合成网片的使用目前存在争议,并且这一讨论尚未在临床或文献中得到解决。我们旨在系统评估在污染区域中使用不可吸收合成网片(NASM)进行腹疝修复的术后结果。

方法

通过对 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cinahl 和 Cochrane Library 的文献检索,确定了所有 2000 年至 2020 年间检查在污染区域中使用 NASM 进行腹疝修复的文章。通过汇总分析和荟萃分析评估术后结果。使用改良的 Newcastle-Ottawa 量表对所有纳入的研究进行定性分析。

结果

在 630 篇不同的出版物和 104 篇需要全文审查的出版物中,本研究纳入了 2007 年至 2020 年期间发表的 17 篇文章。荟萃分析表明,可吸收网片与更高的 HR(OR 1.89,1.15-3.12,p=0.008)、SSO(OR 1.43,0.96-2.11,p=0.087)、SSI(OR 2.84,1.85-4.35,p<0.001)和计划外再次手术(OR 1.99,1.19-3.32,p=0.009)相关。

结论

在污染区域中使用 NASM 进行腹疝修复可能是可吸收网片的安全替代方案,这一点可以从较低的术后并发症发生率得到证明。本综述反驳了当前的临床范例,需要进行更多的前瞻性随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh in a contaminated field: a systematic review and meta-analysis.污染环境下使用合成补片进行腹疝修补术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2021 Aug;25(4):1035-1050. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02358-5. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
3
Absorbable versus non-absorbable tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.可吸收与不可吸收缝线在腹腔镜腹疝修补术中固定补片的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.042. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
4
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
5
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
6
Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation.放置人工补片预防造口旁疝。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 20;7(7):CD008905. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008905.pub3.
7
Management of recurrent hiatal hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mesh versus no mesh reinforcement.复发性食管裂孔疝的管理:一项比较使用补片与不使用补片加强修补的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Jun 3;29(1):195. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03376-x.
8
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.纤维素、改性纤维素和合成膜在终末期肾病患者血液透析中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.
9
Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.开放式补片与非补片用于股疝和腹股沟疝修补术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(4):CD002197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002197.
10
Fascial defect closure versus bridged repair in laparoscopic ventral hernia mesh repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜腹疝补片修补术中筋膜缺损闭合与桥接修复的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1473-1481. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02533-2. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Mesh-Augmented Ventral Hernia Repair Despite Iatrogenic -Peritonitis Due to Progressive Pneumoperitoneum: A Case Report.尽管因进行性气腹导致医源性腹膜炎,仍行补片增强腹疝修补术:一例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2025;11(1). doi: 10.70352/scrj.cr.25-0099. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
2
Meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing biologic and synthetic unabsorbable mesh in contaminated fields.比较生物可吸收和合成不可吸收补片在污染区域应用的对照研究的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11811-4.
3
Use of Biologic and Biosynthetic Mesh for Ventral Hernia Repair in Current Practice.

本文引用的文献

1
Could polypropylene mesh impair male reproductive organs? Experimental study with different methods of implantation.聚丙烯网片是否会损害男性生殖器官?不同植入方法的实验研究。
Hernia. 2020 Dec;24(6):1325-1336. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02186-7. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
2
Long-term outcomes after contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction.污染性复杂腹壁重建术后的长期结果。
Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):459-468. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02124-7. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
3
Comparison of biosynthetic versus synthetic mesh in clean and contaminated ventral hernia repairs.
当前实践中生物材料和生物合成补片在腹疝修补中的应用
JAMA Surg. 2025 Feb 1;160(2):163-170. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5293.
4
Prophylactic mesh versus primary closure in emergency and elective surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.预防性补片与急诊和择期手术中的一期缝合:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Nov 16;29(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03202-w.
5
Contemporary Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Emerging Techniques and Trends.当代腹壁重建:新兴技术与趋势
J Clin Med. 2024 May 13;13(10):2876. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102876.
6
Ventral hernia repair in high-risk patients and contaminated fields using a single mesh: proportional meta-analysis.使用单个网片修复高危患者和污染手术野的腹疝:比例荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1459-1471. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02668-w. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
7
Comparison of outcomes of ventral hernia repair using different meshes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.使用不同补片进行腹疝修补术的疗效比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1561-1571. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02652-4. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
8
[Female patient with fever and right-sided inguinal pain].[发热伴右侧腹股沟疼痛的女性患者]
Chirurg. 2022 Mar;93(3):301-304. doi: 10.1007/s00104-021-01493-8. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
清洁和污染的腹疝修补术中生物合成网片与合成网片的比较。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Apr;90(4):542-546. doi: 10.1111/ans.15587. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
4
Safety and efficacy of prophylactic resorbable biosynthetic mesh following midline laparotomy in clean/contemned field: preliminary results of a randomized double blind prospective trial.预防性可吸收生物合成网在清洁/污染手术野中的应用:一项随机双盲前瞻性试验的初步结果。
Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):85-92. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02025-4. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
5
Innovations in the Plastic Surgery Care Pathway: Using Telemedicine for Clinical Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction.整形外科学护理路径的创新:利用远程医疗提高临床效率和患者满意度。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Aug;144(2):507-516. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005884.
6
Can We Predict Incisional Hernia?: Development of a Surgery-specific Decision-Support Interface.能否预测切口疝?:开发一种针对手术的决策支持接口。
Ann Surg. 2019 Sep;270(3):544-553. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003472.
7
Cost-Utility Analysis of Biologic and Biosynthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: When Are They Worth It?生物补片和生物合成补片在腹外疝修补术中的成本效用分析:何时物有所值?
J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Jan;228(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
8
Use of polypropylene mesh in contaminated and dirty strangulated hernias: short-term results.聚丙烯网片在污染及脏污绞窄性疝中的应用:短期结果
Hernia. 2018 Dec;22(6):1045-1050. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1811-3. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
9
Early Wound Morbidity after Open Ventral Hernia Repair with Biosynthetic or Polypropylene Mesh.使用生物合成或聚丙烯补片进行开放性腹疝修补术后的早期伤口并发症
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Oct;225(4):472-480e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.07.1067. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
10
Complex Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair in Contaminated Surgical Fields: Factors Affecting the Choice of Prosthesis.污染手术区域复杂腹壁疝修补术:影响假体选择的因素
Am Surg. 2017 Jun 1;83(6):583-590.