Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Centre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Addiction. 2021 Aug;116(8):2016-2025. doi: 10.1111/add.15408. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
In recent decades, alcohol drinking in the European Union has been characterized by increasing homogenization of levels of drinking coupled with an overall decrease. This study examined whether we can still distinguish distinct practices of drinking by addressing two research questions: (1) are drinking practices still characterized by the choice of a certain alcoholic beverage; and (2) how do drinking practices vary across countries?
Cross-sectional study: latent-class analyses of drinking variables and fractional response regression analyses of individual characteristics for individual-level class endorsement probabilities, respectively.
Nineteen European countries and one autonomous community.
A total of 27 170 past-year drinkers aged 18-65 years in 2015.
Data were collected through the Standardized European Alcohol Survey included frequency of past-year drinking, pure alcohol intake per drink day, occurrence of monthly risky single-occasion drinking and preferred beverage, together with socio-demographic data.
Three latent classes were identified: (1) light to moderate drinking without risky single-occasion drinking [prevalence: 68.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 66.7-69.3], (2) infrequent heavy drinking (prevalence: 12.6%, 95% CI = 11.5-13.7) and (3) regular drinking with at least monthly risky single-occasion drinking (prevalence: 19.4%, 95% CI = 18.1-20.9). Drinking classes differed considerably in beverage preference, with women reporting a generally higher share of wine and men of beer drinking. Light to moderate drinking without risky single-occasion drinking was the predominant drinking practice in all locations except for Lithuania, where infrequent heavy drinking (class 2) was equally popular. Socio-demographic factors and individual alcohol harm experiences (rapid alcohol on-line screen) explained up to 20.5% of the variability in class endorsement.
Beverage preference appears to remain a decisive indicator for distinguishing Europeans' drinking practices. In most European countries, multiple drinking practices appear to be present.
近几十年来,欧盟的饮酒情况呈现出饮酒水平趋同且总体下降的特点。本研究通过回答两个研究问题,探讨我们是否仍然可以通过区分不同的饮酒行为来识别这种变化:(1)饮酒行为是否仍然以选择某种特定的酒精饮料为特征;(2)饮酒行为在各国之间有何差异?
横断面研究:分别对饮酒变量进行潜在类别分析,对个体特征进行分数反应回归分析,以确定个体水平的类别认同概率。
19 个欧洲国家和 1 个自治区。
共有 27170 名年龄在 18-65 岁的过去一年有饮酒行为的饮酒者,于 2015 年参加调查。
通过标准化欧洲酒精调查收集数据,包括过去一年的饮酒频率、每日纯酒精摄入量、每月危险单次饮酒的发生情况以及首选饮料,同时还收集了社会人口统计学数据。
共识别出 3 个潜在类别:(1)轻中度饮酒且无危险单次饮酒(流行率:68.0%,95%置信区间[CI] 66.7-69.3);(2)不频繁的重度饮酒(流行率:12.6%,95% CI 11.5-13.7);(3)定期饮酒且至少每月有危险单次饮酒(流行率:19.4%,95% CI 18.1-20.9)。饮酒类别在饮料偏好上存在显著差异,女性报告葡萄酒的比例普遍较高,男性则更喜欢啤酒。除立陶宛外,所有地区均以轻中度饮酒且无危险单次饮酒(类别 1)为主流饮酒行为,而在立陶宛,不频繁的重度饮酒(类别 2)也同样流行。社会人口统计学因素和个体酒精危害体验(快速酒精在线筛查)解释了类别认同的 20.5%的可变性。
饮料偏好似乎仍然是区分欧洲人饮酒行为的决定性指标。在大多数欧洲国家,可能存在多种饮酒行为。