• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
RAS Amplification as a Negative Predictor of Benefit from Anti-EGFR-Containing Therapy Regimens in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.RAS 扩增作为转移性结直肠癌患者接受含抗 EGFR 治疗方案获益的阴性预测因子。
Oncologist. 2021 Jun;26(6):469-475. doi: 10.1002/onco.13679. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
2
Efficacy, safety and genomic analysis of SCT200, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, in patients with fluorouracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin refractory RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase Ⅱ study.在氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康和奥沙利铂耐药 RAS 和 BRAF 野生型转移性结直肠癌患者中,抗 EGFR 单克隆抗体 SCT200 的疗效、安全性和基因组分析:一项Ⅱ期研究。
EBioMedicine. 2024 Feb;100:104966. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.104966. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
3
Prognostic and predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗 EGFR 单克隆抗体治疗 RAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌的预后和预测生物标志物:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):1117. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11600-z.
4
FOLFOX plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) is an effective first-line treatment for patients with RAS-wild left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.FOLFOX方案联合抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)单克隆抗体(mAb)是RAS野生型左侧转移性结直肠癌患者的一种有效一线治疗方案:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(10):e0097. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010097.
5
Ultra-selection of metastatic colorectal cancer patients using next-generation sequencing to improve clinical efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy.利用下一代测序技术对转移性结直肠癌患者进行超选择,以提高抗 EGFR 治疗的临床疗效。
Ann Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;30(3):439-446. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz005.
6
Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer.分析PTEN、BRAF和EGFR状态以确定野生型KRAS转移性结肠癌患者从西妥昔单抗治疗中获益的情况。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):5924-30. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6796. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
7
Clinical Impact of PI3K/BRAF Mutations in RAS Wild Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Meta-analysis Results.PI3K/BRAF突变在RAS野生型转移性结直肠癌中的临床影响:荟萃分析结果
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019 Jun;50(2):269-275. doi: 10.1007/s12029-018-0062-y.
8
MicroRNA profiling predicts survival in anti-EGFR treated chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients with wild-type KRAS and BRAF.微小RNA分析可预测抗表皮生长因子受体治疗的野生型KRAS和BRAF的化疗难治性转移性结直肠癌患者的生存率。
Cancer Genet. 2012 Nov;205(11):545-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
9
Clinical significance of BRAF non-V600E mutations on the therapeutic effects of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody treatment in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the Biomarker Research for anti-EGFR monoclonal Antibodies by Comprehensive Cancer genomics (BREAC) study.BRAF非V600E突变对经治转移性结直肠癌患者抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)单克隆抗体治疗疗效的临床意义:综合癌症基因组学抗EGFR单克隆抗体生物标志物研究(BREAC研究)
Br J Cancer. 2017 Nov 7;117(10):1450-1458. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.308. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
10
Prognostic and Predictive Value of HER2 Amplification in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.转移性结直肠癌患者中 HER2 扩增的预后和预测价值。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Sep;17(3):198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Unequal Access to Timely Molecular Testing Results: Addressing the Inequities in Cancer Care Delays across Canada.及时进行分子检测结果的障碍和不平等获取:解决加拿大癌症护理延误的不平等问题。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Mar 6;31(3):1359-1375. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31030103.
2
Impact of Anti-EGFR Therapies on HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.抗 EGFR 治疗对 HER2 阳性转移性结直肠癌的影响:临床结局的系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Oncologist. 2023 Oct 3;28(10):885-893. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad200.
3
USP20 is a predictor of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer and associated with lymph node metastasis, immune infiltration and chemotherapy resistance.USP20是结直肠癌预后不良的一个预测指标,且与淋巴结转移、免疫浸润及化疗耐药相关。
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 16;13:1023292. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1023292. eCollection 2023.
4
Mucinous Histology Is Associated with Resistance to Anti-EGFR Therapy in Patients with Left-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.黏液组织学与左半侧 RAS/BRAF 野生型转移性结直肠癌患者对抗 EGFR 治疗的耐药性相关。
Oncologist. 2022 Mar 4;27(2):104-109. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab028.
5
N6-Methyladenosine Methylation Regulator RBM15 is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker and Promotes Cell Proliferation in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.N6-甲基腺苷甲基化调节因子RBM15是一种潜在的预后生物标志物,可促进胰腺腺癌的细胞增殖。
Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Feb 9;9:842833. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.842833. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
A Novel Next-Generation Sequencing Approach to Detecting Microsatellite Instability and Pan-Tumor Characterization of 1000 Microsatellite Instability-High Cases in 67,000 Patient Samples.一种新型的下一代测序方法,用于检测微卫星不稳定性和 67000 个患者样本中 1000 个微卫星不稳定性高病例的泛肿瘤特征。
J Mol Diagn. 2019 Nov;21(6):1053-1066. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
2
Comprehensive characterization of RAS mutations in colon and rectal cancers in old and young patients.老年和年轻患者结直肠癌中 RAS 突变的全面特征分析。
Nat Commun. 2019 Aug 19;10(1):3722. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11530-0.
3
Final Analysis of Outcomes and RAS/BRAF Status in a Randomized Phase 3 Study of Panitumumab and Best Supportive Care in Chemorefractory Wild Type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.在经化疗治疗后进展的野生型 KRAS 转移性结直肠癌的帕尼单抗联合最佳支持治疗的随机 3 期研究中的最终生存分析和 RAS/BRAF 状态。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Sep;17(3):206-214. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
4
Clinical Relevance of Alternative Endpoints in Colorectal Cancer First-Line Therapy With Bevacizumab: A Retrospective Study.贝伐珠单抗一线治疗结直肠癌中替代终点的临床意义:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Mar;17(1):e99-e107. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
5
RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of real-world data.转移性结直肠癌患者中 RAS 突变的流行率:真实世界数据的荟萃分析。
Biomark Med. 2017 Sep;11(9):751-760. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2016-0358. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
6
Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden.对10万个人类癌症基因组的分析揭示了肿瘤突变负荷的全貌。
Genome Med. 2017 Apr 19;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0424-2.
7
RAS testing practices and RAS mutation prevalence among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from a Europe-wide survey of pathology centres.转移性结直肠癌患者的RAS检测实践与RAS突变患病率:一项欧洲范围内病理中心的调查结果
BMC Cancer. 2016 Oct 26;16(1):825. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2810-3.
8
RAS mutation is a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer patients with metastasectomy.RAS突变是接受转移灶切除术的结直肠癌患者的一种预后生物标志物。
Int J Cancer. 2016 Aug 15;139(4):803-11. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30106. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
9
Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patients.结直肠癌患者血液中的克隆进化及对表皮生长因子受体阻断的耐药性
Nat Med. 2015 Jul;21(7):795-801. doi: 10.1038/nm.3870. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
10
Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和伊立替康联合西妥昔单抗治疗与结直肠癌的 RAS 突变。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):692-700. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4812. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

RAS 扩增作为转移性结直肠癌患者接受含抗 EGFR 治疗方案获益的阴性预测因子。

RAS Amplification as a Negative Predictor of Benefit from Anti-EGFR-Containing Therapy Regimens in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

机构信息

Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2021 Jun;26(6):469-475. doi: 10.1002/onco.13679. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1002/onco.13679
PMID:33465286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8176984/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

RAS short variant (SV) mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) are associated with lack of benefit from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (EGFRmAb). However, the clinical implications for RAS amplification (RASa) as a biomarker for anti-EGFR therapy in CRC remain ill defined.

METHODS

Genomic analysis was performed using the Foundation Medicine (FM) comprehensive genomic profiling database of 37,233 CRC cases. Clinical outcomes were assessed using two independent cohorts: the City of Hope (COH) cohort of 338 patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) and the Flatiron Health-FM real-world clinicogenomic database (CGDB) of 3,904 patients with mCRC.

RESULTS

RASa was detected in 1.6% (614/37,233) of primarily mCRC. RASa 6-9 (n = 241, 39%), 10-19 (n = 165, 27%), and ≥ 20 (n = 209, 34%) copy number subsets had co-RAS SV/BRAF V600E in 63%/3%, 31%/0.6%, and 4.8%/0% of cases, respectively. In the COH cohort, six patients with RASa (13-54 copies) received EGFRmAb, four of six had progressive disease, two had stable disease, and median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) was 2.5 months. Of the CGDB EGFRmAb-treated patients, those with RASa (n = 9) had median TTD of 4.7 months and overall survival (OS) of 11.4 months, those with RAS SV (n = 101) had median TTD and OS of 5.3 and 9.4 months, and those with RAS/BRAF wild-type (n = 608) had median TTD and OS of 7.6 and 13.7 months.

CONCLUSION

Patients with RASa without RAS mutations (1.1% of mCRC) may have poor outcomes on EGFRmAb, although numbers herein were small, and interpretation is confounded by combination chemotherapy. Larger independent studies are warranted to determine if RASa, including degree of amplification, may act similarly to RAS mutation as a resistance mechanism to EGFRmAb therapies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Genomic data suggest that RAS amplification occurs as the sole RAS/RAF alteration in >1% of colorectal cancer cases and that degree of amplification inversely correlates with co-occurring MAPK pathway alterations. Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that RAS amplification may function similarly to RAS mutation as a negative predictor of benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies in colorectal cancer. More clinical data are needed, and comprehensive genomic profiling, including detection of RAS amplification, should be used in trial design to inform therapy selection.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)中 RAS 短变异(SV)突变与表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)单克隆抗体(EGFRmAb)治疗获益缺失相关。然而,RAS 扩增(RASa)作为 CRC 抗 EGFR 治疗的生物标志物的临床意义仍不明确。

方法

采用 Foundation Medicine(FM)综合基因组分析数据库对 37233 例 CRC 病例进行基因组分析。采用两个独立队列评估临床结局:City of Hope(COH)的 338 例转移性 CRC(mCRC)患者队列和 Flatiron Health-FM 真实世界临床基因组数据库(CGDB)的 3904 例 mCRC 患者。

结果

在主要为 mCRC 的患者中,检测到 RASa 占 1.6%(614/37233)。RASa 的 6-9(n=241,39%)、10-19(n=165,27%)和≥20(n=209,34%)拷贝数亚组中,分别有 63%/3%、31%/0.6%和 4.8%/0%的病例伴有 co-RAS SV/BRAF V600E。在 COH 队列中,6 例 RASa(13-54 拷贝)患者接受 EGFRmAb 治疗,其中 4 例疾病进展,2 例疾病稳定,中位治疗终止时间(TTD)为 2.5 个月。在 CGDB 接受 EGFRmAb 治疗的患者中,RASa(n=9)患者的中位 TTD 为 4.7 个月,总生存期(OS)为 11.4 个月,RAS SV(n=101)患者的中位 TTD 和 OS 分别为 5.3 个月和 9.4 个月,RAS/BRAF 野生型(n=608)患者的中位 TTD 和 OS 分别为 7.6 个月和 13.7 个月。

结论

在 EGFRmAb 治疗中,RASa 而无 RAS 突变(mCRC 的 1.1%)的患者可能预后较差,尽管本研究中病例数较少,且联合化疗会影响解释,但仍需要更大规模的独立研究来确定 RASa(包括扩增程度)是否与 RAS 突变一样,作为 EGFRmAb 治疗的耐药机制。

临床意义

基因组数据表明,RAS 扩增是 >1%结直肠癌病例中唯一的 RAS/RAF 改变,且扩增程度与 MAPK 通路改变的共存呈负相关。初步临床证据表明,RAS 扩增可能与 RAS 突变一样,作为结直肠癌抗表皮生长因子受体治疗获益的负预测因子。需要更多的临床数据,全面的基因组分析,包括 RAS 扩增的检测,应在临床试验设计中使用,以指导治疗选择。