Division of Movement and Training Sciences/Biomechanics of Sport, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Division of Movement and Training Sciences/Biomechanics of Sport, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Gait Posture. 2021 Feb;84:352-356. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
Balance is considered to be task-specific as indicated by studies reporting only small-sized and non-significant correlations between types of balance (e.g., static, dynamic). However, it remains unclear whether these associations differ by age and the comparability of studies is limited due to methodological inconsistencies.
Are associations between types of balance performance affected by age in children, adolescents, and young adults?
Static, dynamic, and proactive balance performance was assessed in 30 children (7.6 ± 0.6 years), 43 adolescents (14.7 ± 0.5 years), and 54 young adults (22.8 ± 2.8 years) using the same standardized balance tests. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) were calculated for associations between types of balance and statistically compared to detect differences between age groups.
Except for the association between static (i.e., medio-lateral [M/L] sway) and proactive (Y-balance test) balance performance in young adults (r = .319, p < .05), our analyses revealed small-sized and non-significant associations between measures of static, dynamic, and proactive balance performance in children (-.302 ≤ r ≤ .245, p > .05), adolescents (-.276 ≤ r ≤ .202, p > .05), and young adults (-.120 ≤ r ≤ .161, p > .05). Significant differences between age groups were observed for associations between dynamic and proactive balance, which were lesser in young adults (r = .161) compared to adolescents (r = -.276, p = .017) and children (r = -.302, p = .023) and for associations between static (i.e., M/L sway) and proactive balance, which were larger in young adults (r = .319) compared to adolescents (r = -.131, p = .029).
Practitioners (e.g., PE teachers) should be aware that associations between types of balance performance are small and hardly affected by age in youth. Therefore, they should be trained and tested individually in children, adolescents, and young adults.
研究表明,平衡能力具有任务特异性,静态、动态等不同类型的平衡能力之间只有较小且无统计学意义的相关性。然而,这些关联是否因年龄而异尚不清楚,而且由于方法学上的不一致,研究之间的可比性有限。
在儿童、青少年和年轻成年人中,平衡能力的不同类型之间是否存在与年龄相关的关联?
使用相同的标准化平衡测试,评估了 30 名儿童(7.6 ± 0.6 岁)、43 名青少年(14.7 ± 0.5 岁)和 54 名年轻成年人(22.8 ± 2.8 岁)的静态、动态和主动平衡能力。计算了不同类型平衡能力之间的 Pearson 相关系数(r),并进行了统计学比较,以检测不同年龄组之间的差异。
除了年轻成年人中静态(即中-侧向[M/L]摆动)和主动(Y 平衡测试)平衡能力之间存在较小且有统计学意义的关联(r =.319,p <.05)外,我们的分析结果显示,在儿童(r = -.302 至.245,p >.05)、青少年(r = -.276 至.202,p >.05)和年轻成年人(r = -.120 至.161,p >.05)中,静态、动态和主动平衡能力之间的关联均较小且无统计学意义。在动态和主动平衡能力之间的关联以及静态(即 M/L 摆动)和主动平衡能力之间的关联中,年轻人与青少年和儿童相比,差异具有统计学意义,前者的关联较小(r =.161),后者的关联较大(r = -.302,p =.023 和 r = -.276,p =.017)。年轻人与青少年相比,前者的关联较大(r =.319),后者的关联较小(r = -.131,p =.029)。
从业者(例如,体育教师)应该意识到,平衡能力的不同类型之间的关联较小,在青少年中几乎不受年龄的影响。因此,应在儿童、青少年和年轻成年人中分别对他们进行训练和测试。