Suppr超能文献

热疗设备的一期评估——犹他大学机构报告

Phase I evaluation of hyperthermia equipment--University of Utah institutional report.

作者信息

Sapozink M D, Gibbs F A, Gibbs P, Stewart J R

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City 84109.

出版信息

Int J Hyperthermia. 1988 Jan-Feb;4(1):117-32. doi: 10.3109/02656738809032051.

Abstract

At the University of Utah Medical Center the thrusts of the effort with respect to the NCl Hyperthermia Equipment Evaluation Contract have been threefold. The first objective was the development of a reliable thermometry system for collecting temperature information as a function of space as well as time. The second objective was the evaluation and comparison of a number of hyperthermia devices, particularly with respect to deep-heating devices, and specifically as pertains to the BSD annular phased array system (AA) and its various configurations. The third objective was to develop methodology for analysing hyperthermia data which could be easily adapted toward device comparison. In the period from 10/81-1/86, a total of 137 patients were treated with one or more of 10 devices, totalling 199 device evaluations at the University of Utah Medical Center or the subcontracting institution, LDS Hospital. Of these, 132 device evaluations involved deep-seated tumours. The AA was found to be feasible for deep pelvic regional hyperthermia, although the frequency of reversible acute toxicity was high, and achievement of desired temperatures was frequently limited by one of several factors. The radiative electromagnetic wave applicators which were evaluated for treatment of superficial tumours were found to be mostly feasible for tumours of the thoracic and extremities regions, although the heating patterns were frequently too shallow or too small in area, when compared with the size of the lesion.

摘要

在犹他大学医学中心,针对美国国立癌症研究所(NCl)热疗设备评估合同所开展的工作主要有三个方面。第一个目标是开发一种可靠的测温系统,用于收集随空间和时间变化的温度信息。第二个目标是评估和比较多种热疗设备,特别是针对深部加热设备,具体涉及BSD环形相控阵系统(AA)及其各种配置。第三个目标是开发热疗数据分析方法,以便能够轻松用于设备比较。在1981年10月至1986年1月期间,犹他大学医学中心或分包机构LDS医院共有137名患者接受了10种设备中的一种或多种治疗,总计进行了199次设备评估。其中,132次设备评估涉及深部肿瘤。结果发现,AA对于深部盆腔区域热疗是可行的,尽管可逆性急性毒性的发生率较高,而且达到所需温度常常受到多种因素之一的限制。评估用于治疗浅表肿瘤的辐射电磁波 applicators 发现,对于胸部和四肢区域的肿瘤大多可行,不过与病变大小相比,加热模式往往过浅或面积过小。 (注:原文中“radiative electromagnetic wave applicators”未明确中文释义,这里保留英文)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验