Ruckley R W, Blair R L
Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland.
J Laryngol Otol. 1988 Feb;102(2):125-8.
Thirty-six children with bilateral secretory otitis media were treated by thermal myringotomy and middle ear aspiration in one ear, and conventional myringotomy, middle ear aspiration and Shepard grommet insertion in the other ear. All children underwent adenoidectomy. Comparing the effectiveness of the two different procedures over a three-month review period, our main findings are as follows. All thermal perforations were closed by 42 days. Elimination of middle ear fluid was achieved in 81 per cent of the thermal myringotomy group, and in 100 per cent of the grommet group. While there was no significant difference in the hearing improvement between the procedures, conventional myringotomy and grommet insertion provided significantly better sustained middle ear ventilation.
36名双侧分泌性中耳炎患儿接受了如下治疗:一侧耳朵采用热鼓膜切开术及中耳抽吸术,另一侧耳朵采用传统鼓膜切开术、中耳抽吸术并插入Shepard通气管。所有患儿均接受了腺样体切除术。在为期三个月的观察期内比较这两种不同治疗方法的效果,我们的主要发现如下。所有热穿孔在42天内愈合。热鼓膜切开术组81%的患儿中耳积液消失,通气管组则为100%。虽然两种治疗方法在听力改善方面无显著差异,但传统鼓膜切开术及插入通气管能显著改善中耳的持续通气。