Suppr超能文献

水泥浆体向颗粒床的渗透:渗透模型的比较

Penetration of Cement Pastes into Particle-Beds: A Comparison of Penetration Models.

作者信息

Weger Daniel, Pierre Alexandre, Perrot Arnaud, Kränkel Thomas, Lowke Dirk, Gehlen Christoph

机构信息

Chair of Materials Science and Testing, Centre for Building Materials (CBM), Technical University of Munich, 81245 Munich, Germany.

L2MGC, EA4114, CY Cergy Paris Université, 95031 Cergy-Pontoise, France.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 14;14(2):389. doi: 10.3390/ma14020389.

Abstract

For the selective paste intrusion (SPI) method, thin layers of aggregate are locally bound by cement paste where the structure shall arise. After completion of the printing process, the structure is excavated from the particle-bed and the unbound particles are removed. However, for a sufficient layer bonding and shape accuracy, the rheology of the cement paste must be adapted to the flow resistance of the particle-bed. For practical application, that means mostly time and material consuming "trial and error" tests. To prevent that, analytical models can help to predict the penetration of the cement paste. This paper presents four analytical models to calculate the penetration depth of a cement paste into a particle packing. Based on Darcy's law, an already existing model is slightly modified (model A+) and a generalized (model C), an advanced generalized (model D) as well as a simplified model (model B/B+) are developed. Compared to conducted tests on the penetration depth, model B showed good accuracy (deviation <1.5 mm) for pastes with a yield stress ≥8.2 Pa, model A+/B+/C for ≥ 5.4 Pa and model D even for <5.4 Pa. Finally, an application guide for each model for practical use will be given.

摘要

对于选择性灌浆侵入(SPI)方法,集料薄层在结构形成的部位由水泥浆局部粘结。打印过程完成后,从颗粒床中挖出结构并去除未粘结的颗粒。然而,为了实现足够的层间粘结和形状精度,水泥浆的流变学特性必须与颗粒床的流动阻力相适应。在实际应用中,这通常意味着要进行耗时耗料的“试错”试验。为避免这种情况,分析模型有助于预测水泥浆的渗透情况。本文提出了四个用于计算水泥浆在颗粒堆积体中渗透深度的分析模型。基于达西定律,对一个已有的模型进行了轻微修改(模型A+),并开发了一个广义模型(模型C)、一个高级广义模型(模型D)以及一个简化模型(模型B/B+)。与所进行的渗透深度测试相比,模型B对于屈服应力≥8.2 Pa的水泥浆显示出良好的精度(偏差<1.5 mm),模型A+/B+/C对于≥5.4 Pa的水泥浆精度良好,模型D对于<5.4 Pa的水泥浆精度良好。最后,将给出每个模型在实际应用中的使用指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c86f/7829847/4d469ebdd54a/materials-14-00389-g0A1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验