Abonie Ulric S, Hoekstra Femke, Seves Bregje L, Woude Lucas H V van der, Dekker Rienk, Hettinga Florentina J
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho PMB 31 Volta Region, Ghana.
School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Science, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, UK.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020 Jun 15;5(2):43. doi: 10.3390/jfmk5020043.
Fatigue is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Activity pacing is a behavioral way to cope with fatigue and limited energy resources. However, little is known about how people with MS naturally pace activities to manage their fatigue and optimize daily activities. This study explored how activity pacing relates to fatigue and physical activity in people with MS. Participants were 80 individuals (60 females, 20 males) with a diagnosis of MS. The participants filled in questionnaires on their activity pacing, fatigue, physical activity, and health-related quality of life, 3-6 weeks before discharge from rehabilitation. The relationships between the variables were examined using hierarchical regression. After controlling for demographics, health-related quality of life, and perceived risk of overactivity, no associations were found between activity pacing and fatigue (β = 0.20; t = 1.43, = 0.16) or between activity pacing and physical activity (β = -0.24; t = -1.61, = 0.12). The lack of significant associations between activity pacing and fatigue or physical activity suggests that without interventions, there appears to be no clear strategy amongst people with MS to manage fatigue and improve physical activity. People with MS may benefit from interventions to manage fatigue and optimize engagement in physical activity.
疲劳在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中很常见。活动节奏安排是应对疲劳和有限精力的一种行为方式。然而,对于MS患者如何自然地安排活动节奏以管理疲劳并优化日常活动,我们知之甚少。本研究探讨了活动节奏安排与MS患者的疲劳及身体活动之间的关系。研究对象为80名被诊断患有MS的个体(60名女性,20名男性)。参与者在康复出院前3至6周填写了关于他们活动节奏安排、疲劳、身体活动以及健康相关生活质量的问卷。使用分层回归分析变量之间的关系。在控制了人口统计学因素、健康相关生活质量以及感知到的过度活动风险后,未发现活动节奏安排与疲劳之间存在关联(β = 0.20;t = 1.43, = 0.16),也未发现活动节奏安排与身体活动之间存在关联(β = -0.24;t = -1.61, = 0.12)。活动节奏安排与疲劳或身体活动之间缺乏显著关联表明,在没有干预的情况下,MS患者似乎没有明确的策略来管理疲劳和改善身体活动。MS患者可能会从管理疲劳和优化身体活动参与度的干预措施中受益。