Suppr超能文献

缬更昔洛韦-更昔洛韦的使用与系统性治疗药物监测。抗病毒管理的邀请。

Valganciclovir-Ganciclovir Use and Systematic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. An Invitation to Antiviral Stewardship.

作者信息

Galar Alicia, Valerio Maricela, Catalán Pilar, García-González Xandra, Burillo Almudena, Fernández-Cruz Ana, Zataráin Eduardo, Sousa-Casasnovas Iago, Anaya Fernando, Rodríguez-Ferrero María Luisa, Muñoz Patricia, Bouza Emilio

机构信息

Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, 28007 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jan 15;10(1):77. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10010077.

Abstract

Valganciclovir (VGCV) and ganciclovir (GCV) doses must be adjusted according to indication, renal function and weight. No specific therapeutic exposure values have been established. We aimed to evaluate the adequacy of VGCV/GCV doses, to assess the interpatient variability in GCV serum levels, to identify predictive factors for this variability and to assess the clinical impact. This is a prospective study at a tertiary institution including hospitalized patients receiving VGCV/GCV prophylaxis or treatment. Adequacy of the antiviral dose was defined according to cytomegalovirus guidelines. Serum levels were determined using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Blood samples were drawn at least 3 days after antiviral initiation. Outcome was considered favorable if there was no evidence of cytomegalovirus infection during prophylaxis or when a clinical and microbiological resolution was attained within 21 days of treatment and no need for drug discontinuation due to toxicity. Seventy consecutive patients [74.3% male/median age: 59.2 years] were included. VGCV was used in 25 patients (35.7%) and GCV in 45 (64.3%). VGCV/GCV initial dosage was deemed adequate in 47/70 cases (67.1%), lower than recommended in 7/70 (10%) and higher in 16/70 (22.9%). Large inter-individual variability of serum levels was observed, with median trough levels of 2.3 mg/L and median peak levels of 7.8 mg/L. Inadequate dosing of VGCV/GCV and peak levels lower than 8.37 or greater than 11.86 mg/L were related to poor outcome. Further studies must be performed to confirm these results and to conclusively establish if VGCV/GCV therapeutic drug monitoring could be useful to improve outcomes in specific clinical situations.

摘要

缬更昔洛韦(VGCV)和更昔洛韦(GCV)的剂量必须根据适应证、肾功能和体重进行调整。尚未确定具体的治疗暴露值。我们旨在评估VGCV/GCV剂量的充足性,评估GCV血清水平的患者间变异性,确定这种变异性的预测因素,并评估其临床影响。这是一项在三级医疗机构进行的前瞻性研究,纳入接受VGCV/GCV预防或治疗的住院患者。抗病毒剂量的充足性根据巨细胞病毒指南进行定义。使用高效液相色谱法测定血清水平。在开始抗病毒治疗至少3天后采集血样。如果在预防期间没有巨细胞病毒感染的证据,或者在治疗21天内实现临床和微生物学缓解且无需因毒性而停药,则认为预后良好。连续纳入70例患者[男性占74.3%/中位年龄:59.2岁]。25例患者(35.7%)使用VGCV,45例患者(64.3%)使用GCV。47/70例(67.1%)的VGCV/GCV初始剂量被认为是充足的,7/70例(10%)低于推荐剂量,16/70例(22.9%)高于推荐剂量。观察到血清水平存在较大的个体间变异性,谷浓度中位数为2.3mg/L,峰浓度中位数为7.8mg/L。VGCV/GCV给药不足以及峰浓度低于8.37mg/L或高于11.86mg/L与不良预后相关。必须进行进一步研究以证实这些结果,并最终确定VGCV/GCV治疗药物监测是否有助于改善特定临床情况下的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e7a/7831032/392c8778cc28/antibiotics-10-00077-g001a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验