Boggiano A K, Main D S, Katz P A
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jan;54(1):134-41. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.1.134.
This research tested the hypothesis that children's perceptions of academic competence and their personal control over school-related performance affects subsequent intrinsic interest and preference for challenge in an evaluative setting. In a correlational study, children's self-reported perceptions of academic competence and personal control were found to relate positively to their intrinsic interest in schoolwork and preference for challenging school activities. A subset of this sample was exposed to varying levels of a controlling directive, and preference for challenge was assessed behaviorally during a free-choice period in which subjects were unaware that they were being observed. As predicted, the data indicated that when given the evaluative, controlling directive, children who had high perceptions of academic competence and control preferred a greater challenge than did children whose perceptions were low on these measures. No difference between groups in terms of preference for challenge was evident when no controlling directive was presented. These findings are discussed in terms of theories of intrinsic motivation and potential processes that underly these effects.
本研究检验了这样一种假设,即儿童对学业能力的认知以及他们对与学校相关表现的个人掌控感,会影响在评价情境中后续的内在兴趣和对挑战的偏好。在一项相关性研究中,发现儿童自我报告的学业能力认知和个人掌控感与他们对学业的内在兴趣以及对具有挑战性的学校活动的偏好呈正相关。该样本的一个子集接触了不同程度的控制性指令,并在自由选择期间通过行为评估对挑战的偏好,在此期间受试者并未意识到自己正被观察。正如预测的那样,数据表明,当给出评价性的控制性指令时,对学业能力和掌控感认知较高的儿童比在这些指标上认知较低的儿童更倾向于选择更大的挑战。当没有给出控制性指令时,两组在对挑战的偏好方面没有明显差异。这些发现将根据内在动机理论以及构成这些影响基础的潜在过程进行讨论。