Suppr超能文献

长途飞行中飞行机组人员的警觉性和睡眠与飞行中休息时段的时间安排有关。

Flight Crew Alertness and Sleep Relative to Timing of In-Flight Rest Periods in Long-Haul Flights.

出版信息

Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021 Feb 1;92(2):83-91. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.5672.2021.

Abstract

In-flight breaks are used during augmented long-haul flight operations, allowing pilots a sleep opportunity. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration duty and rest regulations restrict the pilot flying the landing to using the third rest break. It is unclear how effective these restrictions are on pilots ability to obtain sleep. We hypothesized there would be no difference in self-reported sleep, alertness, and fatigue between pilots taking the second vs. third rest breaks. Pilots flying augmented operations in two U.S.-based commercial airlines were eligible for the study. Volunteers completed a survey at top-of-descent (TOD), including self-reported in-flight sleep duration, and Samn-Perelli fatigue and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale ratings. We compared the second to third rest break using noninferiority analysis. The influence of time of day (home-base time; HBT) was evaluated in 4-h blocks using repeated measures ANOVA. From 787 flights 500 pilots provided complete data. The second rest break was noninferior to the third break for self-reported sleep duration (1.5 0.7 h vs. 1.4 0.7 h), fatigue (2.0 1.0 vs. 2.9 1.3), and sleepiness (2.6 1.4 vs. 3.8 1.8) at TOD for landing pilots. Measures of sleep duration, fatigue, and sleepiness were influenced by HBT circadian time of day. We conclude that self-reported in-flight sleep, fatigue, and sleepiness from landing pilots taking the second in-flight rest break are equivalent to or better than pilots taking the third break. Our findings support providing pilots with choice in taking the second or third in-flight rest break during augmented operations.

摘要

飞行休息时间用于增强型长途飞行作业,让飞行员有机会睡觉。美国联邦航空管理局的飞行时间和休息规定限制了负责着陆的飞行员使用第三次休息时间。目前尚不清楚这些限制对飞行员获得睡眠的效果如何。我们假设,在报告的睡眠、警觉性和疲劳方面,第二和第三次休息的飞行员之间没有差异。有资格参加这项研究的是在美国两家商业航空公司中飞行增强型航班的飞行员。志愿者在下降顶(TOD)完成调查,包括报告的飞行中睡眠时间,以及 Samn-Perelli 疲劳和 Karolinska 嗜睡量表评分。我们使用非劣效性分析比较了第二次和第三次休息时间。使用重复测量方差分析,在 4 小时块中评估了时间的影响(基地时间;HBT)。从 787 次飞行中,500 名飞行员提供了完整的数据。第二次休息时间在报告的睡眠时间(1.5 0.7 小时对 1.4 0.7 小时)、疲劳(2.0 1.0 对 2.9 1.3)和嗜睡(2.6 1.4 对 3.8 1.8)方面不劣于第三次休息时间,用于负责着陆的飞行员。睡眠时间、疲劳和嗜睡的测量值受 HBT 昼夜节律时间的影响。我们的结论是,负责着陆的飞行员在飞行中休息第二次的报告的睡眠时间、疲劳和嗜睡与飞行员休息第三次的效果相当或更好。我们的研究结果支持在增强型飞行作业中为飞行员提供选择第二次或第三次飞行休息的机会。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验