Department of Development Studies, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) University of London, Thornhaugh Street, Russell Square, London WC1H 0XG, United Kingdom.
Organization for Sustainable Development & Research (OSDR), House #1676, Opposite Street to Muhibzadah Center, Pul-e- Surkh Square, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Mar;89:103117. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103117. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
In this paper we look at local effects of recent changes in how the international borders of two Afghan provinces, Nangarhar and Nimroz, are governed. Over the past decade Pakistan and Iran introduced changes to border infrastructure and regulation in an attempt to increase state control over both official and informal flows of goods and people. We consider the political rationale behind these decisions, then look at the consequences these changes have had on licit as well as illicit economic activities in the border region. The paper builds on field research conducted in Nangarhar and Nimroz from 2018 to 2020. We find that reducing the permeability of the border has affected life in the neighbouring Afghan borderlands in different ways. In Nimroz, an informal local economy existing between historically interwoven Baluch communities on all sides of the border is being crowded out by boom-town dynamics, external land acquisition and selective control of the border by foreign states. The impact of border enforcement is direct and drastic, damaging the survival economy of border communities and accelerating demographic change. In Nangarhar, we find a more diverse and adaptive local cross-border economy, with a history of utilising both official and informal border crossings for trade in licit and illicit commodities. However, measures taken on the Pakistani side have led to shifts in informal trade, and changes to patterns of competition and control over the most lucrative routes and hubs. In both cases, illicit cross-border flows did not cease, but they changed in character from more broadly accessible horizontal activities to professional and hierarchical activities using fewer trading hubs and corridors. The drug trade is not exceptionally violent or disruptive, but is part of a commodity market embedded in a wider, often violent, political economy dominated by local political entrepreneurs and their networks.
本文着眼于阿富汗两个省份楠格哈尔省和尼姆鲁兹省的国际边界管理方式最近发生的变化所带来的局部影响。过去十年中,巴基斯坦和伊朗对边境基础设施和监管规定进行了调整,试图加强对官方和非官方货物及人员流动的控制。我们首先分析了这些决策的政治背景,然后研究了这些变化对边境地区合法和非法经济活动的影响。本文的研究基础是 2018 年至 2020 年在楠格哈尔省和尼姆鲁兹省进行的实地研究。研究发现,边境渗透性的降低以不同的方式影响了邻国阿富汗边境地区的生活。在尼姆鲁兹,历史上交织在一起的俾路支社区之间存在的非正式地方经济,正被城镇繁荣、外部土地收购以及外国对边境的选择性控制所排挤。边境执法的影响是直接而剧烈的,破坏了边境社区的生存经济,加速了人口变化。在楠格哈尔,我们发现了一个更加多样化和适应性强的地方跨境经济,历史上曾利用官方和非正式的过境点进行合法和非法商品的贸易。然而,巴基斯坦方面采取的措施导致了非正式贸易的转移,以及对最有利可图的路线和枢纽的竞争和控制模式的变化。在这两种情况下,非法跨境流动并没有停止,而是从更广泛可及的横向活动转变为使用更少贸易枢纽和走廊的专业和层级活动。毒品贸易并非异常暴力或具有破坏性,但它是嵌入更广泛、往往暴力的政治经济中的商品市场的一部分,由当地政治企业家及其网络主导。