• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吉布森认知技能评估(GACS)的可靠性证据:一种用于筛查全生命周期认知技能的简短工具。

Reliability Evidence for the Gibson Assessment of Cognitive Skills (GACS): A Brief Tool for Screening Cognitive Skills Across the Lifespan.

作者信息

Moore Amy Lawson, Miller Terissa M, Ledbetter Christina

机构信息

Gibson Institute of Cognitive Research, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Jan 13;14:31-40. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S291574. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S291574
PMID:33469392
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7812527/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the current study was to examine and report three sources of reliability evidence for the Gibson Assessment of Cognitive Skills, a paper-based, brief cognitive screening tool for children and adults measuring working memory, processing speed, visual processing, logic and reasoning, and three auditory processing constructs: sound blending, sound segmenting, sound deletion along with work attack skills.

SAMPLE AND METHODS

The sample (n = 103) for the current study consisted of children (n = 73) and adults (n = 30) between the ages of 6 and 80 ( = 20.2), 47.6% of which were female and 52.4% of which were male. Analyses of test data included calculation of internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

Overall coefficient alphas range from 0.80 to 0.94, producing a strong source of internal consistency reliability evidence. The split-half reliability coefficients ranged from 0.83 to 0.96 overall, producing a strong second source of reliability evidence. Across all ages, the test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.83 to 0.98. For adults ages 18 to 80, test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.73 to 0.99. For children ages 6 through 17, test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.89 to 0.97. All correlations were statistically significant at p < 0.001, indicating strong test-retest reliability and stability across administrations.

CONCLUSION

The evidence collected for the current study suggests that the GACS is a reliable brief screening tool for assessing cognitive skill performance in both children and adults.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验并报告吉布森认知技能评估(Gibson Assessment of Cognitive Skills)的三种可靠性证据来源。该评估是一种纸质的简短认知筛查工具,用于儿童和成人,可测量工作记忆、处理速度、视觉处理、逻辑与推理,以及三种听觉处理结构:声音混合、声音分割、声音删除,同时还包括作业攻克技能。

样本与方法

本研究的样本(n = 103)包括6至80岁(平均年龄=20.2岁)的儿童(n = 73)和成人(n = 30),其中47.6%为女性,52.4%为男性。对测试数据的分析包括计算内部一致性信度、分半信度和重测信度。

结果

总体系数阿尔法值范围为0.80至0.94,产生了强有力的内部一致性信度证据来源。分半信度系数总体范围为0.83至0.96,产生了第二个强有力的信度证据来源。在所有年龄段中,重测信度系数范围为0.83至0.98。对于18至80岁的成年人,重测信度系数范围为0.73至0.99。对于6至17岁的儿童,重测信度系数范围为0.89至0.97。所有相关性在p < 0.001时具有统计学意义,表明跨管理的重测信度和稳定性很强。

结论

本研究收集的证据表明,吉布森认知技能评估量表(GACS)是一种可靠的简短筛查工具,可用于评估儿童和成人的认知技能表现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f509/7812527/ae4716b33e75/PRBM-14-31-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f509/7812527/e3e8c983400e/PRBM-14-31-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f509/7812527/6419786f5167/PRBM-14-31-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f509/7812527/c063503f69a4/PRBM-14-31-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f509/7812527/ae4716b33e75/PRBM-14-31-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f509/7812527/e3e8c983400e/PRBM-14-31-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f509/7812527/6419786f5167/PRBM-14-31-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f509/7812527/c063503f69a4/PRBM-14-31-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f509/7812527/ae4716b33e75/PRBM-14-31-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability Evidence for the Gibson Assessment of Cognitive Skills (GACS): A Brief Tool for Screening Cognitive Skills Across the Lifespan.吉布森认知技能评估(GACS)的可靠性证据:一种用于筛查全生命周期认知技能的简短工具。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Jan 13;14:31-40. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S291574. eCollection 2021.
2
Reliability and validity of the revised Gibson Test of Cognitive Skills, a computer-based test battery for assessing cognition across the lifespan.修订版吉布森认知技能测试的信度和效度,这是一种用于评估全生命周期认知能力的基于计算机的成套测试。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018 Feb 12;11:25-35. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S152781. eCollection 2018.
3
Test-retest reliability of RC21X: a web-based cognitive and neuromotor performance measurement tool.RC21X 的重测信度:一种基于网络的认知和神经运动表现测量工具。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2021 Apr 21;36(3):322-328. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa056.
4
Reliability of a tool for measuring theory of planned behaviour constructs for use in evaluating research use in policymaking.用于评估政策制定中研究使用情况的计划行为理论构念测量工具的可靠性。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2011 Jun 24;9:29. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-9-29.
5
The Dichotic Digits difference Test (DDdT): Development, Normative Data, and Test-Retest Reliability Studies Part 1.双耳数字差异测试(DDdT):开发、常模数据及重测信度研究 第1部分
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Jun;27(6):458-469. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15084.
6
Reliability and validity of play-based assessments of motor and cognitive skills for infants and young children: a systematic review.基于游戏的婴幼儿运动和认知技能评估的可靠性与有效性:一项系统综述
Phys Ther. 2015 Jan;95(1):25-38. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140111. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
7
Reliability and responsiveness of the Self-Efficacy in Assessing, Training and Spotting wheelchair skills (SEATS) outcome measure.评估、训练和发现轮椅技能的自我效能感(SEATS)结果测量的信度和反应度
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Apr;14(3):250-254. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1428370. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Test-Retest Reliability of a Serious Game for Delirium Screening in the Emergency Department.急诊科谵妄筛查严肃游戏的重测信度
Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 Nov 7;8:258. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00258. eCollection 2016.
9
Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs.计算机化脑震荡测试的重测信度:中枢神经系统生命体征
Sports Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;7(5):443-7. doi: 10.1177/1941738115586997. Epub 2015 May 15.
10
Assessment of children with suspected auditory processing disorder: a factor analysis study.疑似听觉处理障碍儿童的评估:一项因素分析研究。
Ear Hear. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):295-305. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000441034.02052.0a.

本文引用的文献

1
The Flynn effect for fluid IQ may not generalize to all ages or ability levels: a population-based study of 10,000 US adolescents.流体智力的弗林效应可能并不适用于所有年龄段或能力水平:一项基于美国1万名青少年的人群研究。
Intelligence. 2019 Nov-Dec;77. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2019.101385. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
2
How to Correct for Computer Experience in Online Cognitive Testing?如何在在线认知测试中校正计算机使用经验的影响?
Assessment. 2021 Jul;28(5):1247-1255. doi: 10.1177/1073191120911098. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
3
Not All Nonverbal Tasks Are Equally Nonverbal: Comparing Two Tasks in Bilingual Kindergartners With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.
并非所有非言语任务都是同等非言语的:比较有和没有发展性语言障碍的双语幼儿园儿童的两项任务。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Sep 20;62(9):3462-3469. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0331. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
Test use and assessment practices of school psychologists in the United States: Findings from the 2017 National Survey.美国学校心理学家的测试使用和评估实践:2017 年全国调查结果。
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Feb;72:29-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 30.
5
Current limitations of neuropsychological tests and assessment procedures.神经心理学测试和评估程序的当前局限性。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Feb;33(2):200-208. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1552762. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
6
Improving precision in neuropsychological assessment: Bridging the gap between classic paper-and-pencil tests and paradigms from cognitive neuroscience.提高神经心理学评估的精度:弥合经典纸笔测试与认知神经科学范式之间的差距。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Feb;33(2):357-368. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1518489. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
7
Reliability and validity of the revised Gibson Test of Cognitive Skills, a computer-based test battery for assessing cognition across the lifespan.修订版吉布森认知技能测试的信度和效度,这是一种用于评估全生命周期认知能力的基于计算机的成套测试。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018 Feb 12;11:25-35. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S152781. eCollection 2018.
8
Woodcock-Johnson-III, Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT), Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (KABC), and Differential Ability Scales (DAS) support Carroll but not Cattell-Horn.伍德科克-约翰逊第三版、考夫曼青少年与成人智力量表(KAIT)、考夫曼儿童成套评估测验(KABC)以及差异能力量表(DAS)支持卡罗尔的理论,但不支持卡特尔-霍恩的理论。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Aug;29(8):1001-1015. doi: 10.1037/pas0000389. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
9
Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs.计算机化神经认知测试组合CNS Vital Signs的信度和效度。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;21(7):623-43. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.007. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
10
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA):一种用于轻度认知障碍的简易筛查工具。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.