Mognon Irene, Sprenger Simone A, Kuijper Sanne J M, Hendriks Petra
Center for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Department of Inclusive and Special Needs Education, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 5;11:556667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.556667. eCollection 2020.
Upon hearing "Some of Michelangelo's sculptures are in Rome," adults can easily generate a scalar implicature and infer that the intended meaning of the utterance corresponds to "Some but not all Michelangelo's sculptures are in Rome." Comprehension experiments show that preschoolers struggle with this kind of inference until at least 5 years of age. Surprisingly, the few studies having investigated children's production of scalar expressions like and suggest that production is adult-like already in their third year of life. Thus, children's production of implicatures seems to develop at least 2 years before their comprehension of implicatures. In this paper, we present a novel account of scalar implicature generation in the framework of Bidirectional Optimality Theory: the Asymmetry Account. We show that the production-comprehension asymmetry is predicted to emerge because the comprehension of requires the hearer to consider the speaker's perspective, but the production of does not require the speaker to consider the hearer's perspective. Hence, children's comprehension of scalar expressions, but not their production of scalar expressions, is predicted to be related to their theory of mind development. Not possessing fully developed theory of mind abilities yet, children thus have difficulty in comprehending scalar expressions such as in an adult-like way. Our account also explains why variable performance is found in experimental studies testing children's ability to generate scalar implicatures; moreover, it describes the differences between children's and adults' implicature generation in terms of their ability to recursively apply theory of mind; finally, it sheds new light on the question why the interpretation of numerals does not require implicature generation.
听到“米开朗基罗的一些雕塑在罗马”这句话时,成年人能够轻松地产生数量含义,并推断出这句话的预期意思是“米开朗基罗的一些但并非所有雕塑在罗马”。理解实验表明,学龄前儿童至少要到5岁才能理解这类推理。令人惊讶的是,少数几项研究儿童使用像“一些”和“全部”这样的数量词表达的研究表明,他们在三岁时的表达就已经像成年人一样了。因此,儿童数量含义的表达似乎比他们对数量含义的理解至少早两年发展。在本文中,我们在双向优化理论框架下提出了一种关于数量含义生成的新解释:不对称解释。我们表明,预计会出现表达-理解不对称,因为对“一些”的理解要求听者考虑说话者的视角,但“一些”的表达并不要求说话者考虑听者的视角。因此,预计儿童对数量词表达的理解,而非他们对数量词表达的使用,与他们的心理理论发展有关。由于尚未具备完全发展的心理理论能力,儿童因此难以像成年人那样理解诸如“一些”这样的数量词表达。我们的解释还解释了为什么在测试儿童生成数量含义能力的实验研究中会发现表现存在差异;此外,它从儿童和成年人递归应用心理理论的能力方面描述了他们数量含义生成的差异;最后,它为为什么数字的解释不需要数量含义生成这个问题提供了新的见解。