Suppr超能文献

脑电图痫样异常与急性脑损伤后癫痫发生的关系。

Association of Epileptiform Abnormality on Electroencephalography with Development of Epilepsy After Acute Brain Injury.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine and Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, APC 5, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.

出版信息

Neurocrit Care. 2021 Oct;35(2):428-433. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01182-0. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Epileptiform abnormalities (EA) on continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) are associated with increased risk of acute seizures; however, data on their association with development of long-term epilepsy are limited. We aimed to investigate the association of EA in patients with acute brain injury (ABI): ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, traumatic brain injury, encephalitis, or posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, and subsequent development of epilepsy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients with ABI who had at least 6 hours of cEEG during the index admission between 1/1/2017 and 12/31/2018 and at least 12 months of follow-up. We compared patients with EAs; defined as lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs), lateralized rhythmic delta activity (LRDA), generalized periodic discharges (GPDs), and sporadic interictal epileptiform discharges (sIEDs) to patients without EAs on cEEG. The primary outcome was the new development of epilepsy, defined as the occurrence of spontaneous clinical seizures following hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included time to development of epilepsy and use of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) at the time of last follow-up visit.

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients with ABI met study inclusion criteria. Thirty-one patients (30.7%) had EAs on cEEG. The median (IQR) time to cEEG was 2 (1-5) days. During a median (IQR) follow-up period of 19.1 (16.2-24.3) months, 25.7% of patients developed epilepsy; the percentage of patients who developed epilepsy was higher in those with EAs compared to those without EAs (41.9% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.025). Patients with EAs were more likely to be continued on ASMs during follow-up compared to patients without EAs (67.7% vs. 38.6%, p = 0.009). Using multivariable Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for age, mental status, electrographic seizures on cEEG, sex, ABI etiology, and ASM treatment on discharge, patients with EAs had a significantly increased risk of developing epilepsy compared to patients without EA (hazard ratio 3.39; 95% CI 1.39-8.26; p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

EAs on cEEG in patients with ABI are associated with a greater than three-fold increased risk of new-onset epilepsy. cEEG findings in ABI may therefore be a useful risk stratification tool for assessing long-term risk of seizures and serve as a biomarker for new-onset epilepsy.

摘要

背景/目的:连续脑电图(cEEG)上的癫痫样异常(EA)与急性癫痫发作风险增加相关;然而,关于其与长期癫痫发展关系的数据有限。我们旨在研究急性脑损伤(ABI)患者中 EA 的相关性:缺血性或出血性中风、创伤性脑损伤、脑炎或后部可逆性脑病综合征,以及随后发生的癫痫。

方法

这是一项回顾性、单中心研究,纳入了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间在索引住院期间接受至少 6 小时 cEEG 监测且至少有 12 个月随访的 ABI 患者。我们比较了有和无 cEEG 上 EA 的患者;EA 定义为局灶性周期性放电(LPDs)、局灶性节律性 delta 活动(LRDA)、全身性周期性放电(GPDs)和散发性发作间期癫痫样放电(sIEDs)。主要结局是新发癫痫,定义为出院后自发性临床发作。次要结局包括癫痫发作的时间以及最后一次随访时抗癫痫药物(ASM)的使用。

结果

101 例 ABI 患者符合研究纳入标准。31 例(30.7%)患者的 cEEG 上有 EA。cEEG 的中位数(IQR)时间为 2(1-5)天。在中位数(IQR)19.1(16.2-24.3)个月的随访期间,25.7%的患者发生了癫痫;有 EA 的患者发生癫痫的比例高于无 EA 的患者(41.9%比 18.6%,p=0.025)。与无 EA 的患者相比,有 EA 的患者在随访期间更有可能继续使用 ASM(67.7%比 38.6%,p=0.009)。使用多变量 Cox 回归分析,在校正年龄、意识状态、cEEG 上的电发作、性别、ABI 病因和出院时的 ASM 治疗后,与无 EA 患者相比,有 EA 的患者发生癫痫的风险显著增加(风险比 3.39;95%置信区间 1.39-8.26;p=0.007)。

结论

ABI 患者 cEEG 上的 EA 与新发癫痫的风险增加三倍以上相关。因此,ABI 中的 cEEG 发现可能是评估癫痫发作长期风险的有用风险分层工具,并可作为新发癫痫的生物标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验