Suppr超能文献

抗生素治疗与无抗生素治疗对 2 至 59 个月龄有世界卫生组织定义的非重症肺炎和喘息的儿童的影响。

Antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotic therapy for children aged 2 to 59 months with WHO-defined non-severe pneumonia and wheeze.

机构信息

Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Department of Women's and Children's Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 20;1(1):CD009576. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009576.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, pneumonia is the leading cause of death amongst children under five years of age, and accounts for approximately two million deaths annually. Pneumonia can be classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Classification includes assessment of certain clinical signs and symptoms, and the severity of the disease. Treatment is then tailored according to the classification. For non-severe pneumonia, the WHO recommends treatment with oral antibiotics. We used the 2014 WHO definition of non-severe pneumonia for this review: an acute episode of cough, or difficulty in breathing, combined with fast breathing and chest indrawing. The WHO recommends treating non-severe pneumonia with oral antibiotics. Pneumonia is more commonly caused by viruses that do not require antibiotic treatment, but pneumonia caused by bacteria needs management with antibiotics to avoid complications. There is no clear way to quickly distinguish between viral and bacterial pneumonia. It is considered safe to give antibiotics, however, this may lead to the development of antibiotic resistance, and thus, limit their use in future infections. Therefore, it is essential to explore the efficacy of antibiotics for children with WHO-defined non-severe pneumonia and wheeze.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotic therapy for children aged 2 to 59 months with WHO-defined non-severe pneumonia and wheeze.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, four other databases, and two trial registers (December 2020).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotic therapy for children, aged 2 to 59 months, with non-severe pneumonia and wheeze. We defined non-severe pneumonia as 'a cough or difficulty in breathing, with rapid breathing (a respiratory rate of 50 breaths per minute or more for children aged 2 to 12 months, or a respiratory rate of 40 breaths per minute or more for children aged 12 to 59 months), chest indrawing and wheeze'. We excluded trials involving children with severe or very severe pneumonia, and non-RCTs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our primary outcomes were clinical cure and treatment failure; secondary outcomes were relapse, mortality, and treatment harms. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. Two review authors independently assessed the search results, extracted data, assessed risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence. We contacted the authors of two included trials and the author of the trial awaiting classification to obtain missing numerical outcome data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three trials involving 3256 children aged between 2 to 59 months, who exhibited features of non-severe pneumonia with wheeze. The included trials were multi-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials carried out in Malawi, Pakistan, and India. The children were treated with a three-day course of amoxicillin or placebo, and were followed up for a total of two weeks. We assessed the included trials at overall low risk of bias for random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, attrition bias, and selective reporting. Only one trial was assessed to be at high risk for blinding of outcome assessors. One trial is awaiting classification Antibiotic therapy may result in a reduction of treatment failure by 20% (risk ratio (RR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 0.94; three trials; 3222 participants; low-certainty evidence). Antibiotic therapy probably results in little or no difference to clinical cure (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.08; one trial; 456 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and in little or no difference to relapse (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.34; three trials; 2795 participants; low-certainty evidence), and treatment harms (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.09; three trials, 3253 participants; low-certainty evidence). Two trials (2112 participants ) reported on mortality; no deaths occurred in either group. One trial reported cases of hospitalisation, diarrhoea (with and without dehydration), rash (without itch), tremors, mild nausea and vomiting.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We do not currently have enough evidence to support or challenge the continued use of antibiotics for the treatment of non-severe pneumonia. There is a clear need for RCTs to address this question in children aged 2 to 59 months with 2014 WHO-defined non-severe pneumonia and wheeze.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,肺炎是导致五岁以下儿童死亡的主要原因,每年约有 200 万人因此死亡。肺炎可以根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的指南进行分类。分类包括评估某些临床体征和症状以及疾病的严重程度。然后根据分类进行治疗。对于非重症肺炎,世卫组织建议使用口服抗生素进行治疗。我们使用 2014 年世卫组织对非重症肺炎的定义来进行本次综述:急性咳嗽或呼吸困难,伴有呼吸急促和胸壁凹陷。世卫组织建议使用口服抗生素治疗非重症肺炎。肺炎通常由不需要抗生素治疗的病毒引起,但由细菌引起的肺炎需要用抗生素进行管理,以避免并发症。目前尚无明确方法可以快速区分病毒和细菌性肺炎。使用抗生素是安全的,但是,这可能导致抗生素耐药性的发展,从而限制了它们在未来感染中的使用。因此,有必要探索针对符合世卫组织定义的患有非重症肺炎和喘息的儿童使用抗生素的疗效。

目的

评估抗生素治疗与无抗生素治疗对 2 至 59 个月大的患有世卫组织定义的非重症肺炎和喘息的儿童的疗效。

检索方法

我们检索了 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、另外四个数据库和两个试验登记处(2020 年 12 月)。

选择标准

我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),评估了抗生素治疗与无抗生素治疗对年龄在 2 至 59 个月、患有非重症肺炎和喘息的儿童的疗效。我们将非重症肺炎定义为“咳嗽或呼吸困难,呼吸急促(2 至 12 个月大的儿童呼吸频率为 50 次/分钟或以上,12 至 59 个月大的儿童呼吸频率为 40 次/分钟或以上)、胸壁凹陷和喘息”。我们排除了涉及重症或极重症肺炎的试验和非 RCT。

数据收集和分析

我们的主要结局是临床治愈和治疗失败;次要结局是复发、死亡率和治疗危害。我们使用了 Cochrane 预期的标准方法学程序。我们使用 GRADE 评估证据的确定性。两位综述作者独立评估了检索结果、提取数据、评估风险偏倚和证据的确定性。我们联系了两项纳入试验的作者和一项等待分类的试验的作者,以获取缺失的数值结局数据。

主要结果

我们纳入了三项涉及 3256 名年龄在 2 至 59 个月之间、表现出非重症肺炎伴喘息特征的儿童的试验。纳入的试验为多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,在马拉维、巴基斯坦和印度进行。儿童接受为期三天的阿莫西林或安慰剂治疗,并随访两周。我们评估了纳入的试验,总体上对于随机序列生成、分配隐藏、盲法、失访偏倚和选择性报告的风险较低。只有一项试验被评估为对于结局评估者的盲法存在高风险。一项试验正在等待分类。抗生素治疗可能使治疗失败的风险降低 20%(风险比 (RR) 0.80,95%置信区间 (CI) 0.68 至 0.94;三项试验;3222 名参与者;低确定性证据)。抗生素治疗可能对临床治愈率没有或几乎没有差异(RR 1.02,95% CI 0.96 至 1.08;一项试验;456 名参与者;中确定性证据),对复发率也没有或几乎没有差异(RR 1.00,95% CI 0.74 至 1.34;三项试验;2795 名参与者;低确定性证据),以及治疗危害也没有或几乎没有差异(RR 0.81,95% CI 0.60 至 1.09;三项试验,3253 名参与者;低确定性证据)。两项试验(2112 名参与者)报告了死亡率;两组均无死亡病例。一项试验报告了住院治疗、腹泻(伴或不伴脱水)、皮疹(无瘙痒)、震颤、轻度恶心和呕吐的病例。

作者结论

我们目前没有足够的证据来支持或挑战继续使用抗生素治疗非重症肺炎。非常有必要开展 RCT,以解决 2 至 59 个月大的儿童患有 2014 年世卫组织定义的非重症肺炎和喘息的问题。

相似文献

1
Antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotic therapy for children aged 2 to 59 months with WHO-defined non-severe pneumonia and wheeze.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 20;1(1):CD009576. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009576.pub3.
3
Antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotic therapy for children aged two to 59 months with WHO-defined non-severe pneumonia and wheeze.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 26(5):CD009576. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009576.pub2.
4
Interventions for treating genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 22;9(9):CD010485. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010485.pub2.
5
Interventions for bacterial folliculitis and boils (furuncles and carbuncles).
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD013099. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013099.pub2.
6
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 17;3(3):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub5.
7
Interventions for the prevention of recurrent erysipelas and cellulitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 20;6(6):CD009758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009758.pub2.
8
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub6.
9
Prophylactic drug management for febrile seizures in children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 16;6(6):CD003031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003031.pub4.
10
Antibiotics for exacerbations of asthma.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD002741. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002741.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
Research progress of biomarkers in evaluating the severity and prognostic value of severe pneumonia in children.
Front Pediatr. 2024 Oct 1;12:1417644. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1417644. eCollection 2024.
4
Bad research is not all bad.
Trials. 2023 Oct 20;24(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07706-1.
6
Effects of Vitamin D on the Renin-Angiotensin System and Acute Childhood Pneumonia.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Nov 3;11(11):1545. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111545.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized Trial of Amoxicillin for Pneumonia in Pakistan.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 2;383(1):24-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911998.
2
Amoxicillin for 3 or 5 Days for Chest-Indrawing Pneumonia in Malawian Children.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 2;383(1):13-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1912400.
5
Antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia in neonates and children: WHO evidence review.
Paediatr Int Child Health. 2018 Nov;38(sup1):S66-S75. doi: 10.1080/20469047.2017.1409455.
6
Respiratory syncytial virus prevention and asthma in healthy preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial.
Lancet Respir Med. 2018 Apr;6(4):257-264. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30055-9. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
9
Measuring progress on preventing pneumonia deaths: are we there yet?
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;17(11):1100-1101. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30481-4. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验