• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PriCARE 分类法制定:以经救护车转运的潜在可预防急诊就诊为研究对象:一项 RAND/UCLA 改良 Delphi 研究方案

Development of the PriCARE classification for potentially preventable emergency department visits by ambulance: a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study protocol.

机构信息

Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

The Wilson Centre and Post MD Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e045351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045351.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045351
PMID:33472792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7818828/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ontario ambulances are restricted from patient transportation to sub-acute levels of care when these facilities may be more suitable than emergency departments for non-emergent conditions. There is no known patient classification specifically constructed to inform ED diversion protocols and guidance for sub-acute centre transportation for primary care-like patient conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To construct a novel patient classification of potentially preventable emergency department visits following transport by ambulance, and analyse patient-level characteristic associations with this classification based in Ontario secondary data.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Primary Care-like Ambulance transports following Response for 911-Emergencies (PriCARE) patient classification will be constructed using a two-phase RAND/UCLA modified Delphi design. All experts included are physicians with relevant experience in emergency and/or primary care in Ontario. The first phase of the study will determine consensus of the expert committee on which ED interventions performed on patients with non-emergent acuities could be conducted in sub-acute healthcare centres. The second phase will assess consensus of which patient, hospital and acuity factors are most appropriate to be incorporated into a PriCARE classification. We will also investigate secondary outcomes on consensus of which ED interventions could be transferred to a paramedic context given an expanded scope of practice and patient-level characteristics of PriCARE classified individuals.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study received a research ethics board exemption waiver from the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board; review reference 2020-11451-GRA. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences. The results will be shared with Ontario paramedic services and governing institutions. This study will be used to inform patient classification protocols and clinical decision tools for ambulances to transport to sub-acute healthcare centres.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN22901977.

摘要

简介

安大略省的救护车在将患者送往亚急性护理水平时受到限制,而这些设施在非紧急情况下可能比急诊部门更适合。目前还没有专门构建的患者分类来告知急诊科分流协议,并为初级保健类患者的亚急性中心转运提供指导。

目的

构建一种新的潜在可预防的急诊科就诊患者分类,用于分析安大略省二次数据中基于患者水平特征与该分类的关联。

方法和分析

使用两轮 RAND/UCLA 改良 Delphi 设计来构建类似于初级保健的救护车转运后出现的紧急情况(PriCARE)患者分类。所有参与的专家都是在安大略省具有急诊和/或初级保健相关经验的医生。研究的第一阶段将确定专家委员会对哪些非紧急急症患者的急诊科干预措施可以在亚急性医疗中心进行的共识。第二阶段将评估哪些患者、医院和严重程度因素最适合纳入 PriCARE 分类的共识。我们还将调查在扩大执业范围和 PriCARE 分类个体的患者水平特征的背景下,哪些急诊科干预措施可以转移到护理人员手中的共识的次要结果。

伦理和传播

这项研究获得了汉密尔顿综合研究伦理委员会的豁免研究伦理委员会审查参考号 2020-11451-GRA。研究结果将提交给同行评审期刊发表,并在相关会议上展示。研究结果将与安大略省护理人员服务和管理机构共享。这项研究将用于为救护车送往亚急性医疗机构的患者分类协议和临床决策工具提供信息。

试验注册号

ISRCTN22901977。

相似文献

1
Development of the PriCARE classification for potentially preventable emergency department visits by ambulance: a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study protocol.PriCARE 分类法制定:以经救护车转运的潜在可预防急诊就诊为研究对象:一项 RAND/UCLA 改良 Delphi 研究方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e045351. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045351.
2
Emergency department interventions that could be conducted in subacute care settings for patients with nonemergent conditions transported by paramedics: a modified Delphi study.经急救人员运送的非紧急状况患者在亚急性护理环境中可进行的急诊干预:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Jan 11;10(1):E1-E7. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210148. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.
3
Inclusion of patient-level emergency department characteristics to classify potentially redirectable visits to subacute care: a modified Delphi consensus study.纳入患者层面的急诊科特征,以对潜在可转至亚急性护理的就诊进行分类:一项改良 Delphi 共识研究。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Jan 24;11(1):E70-E76. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220062. Print 2023 Jan-Feb.
4
Identifying patient characteristics associated with potentially redirectable paramedic transported emergency department visits in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study.识别与加拿大安大略省潜在可重新定向的护理人员转运急诊科就诊相关的患者特征:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 30;11(12):e054625. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054625.
5
Defining the concept of mental dysregulation in patients requiring ambulance and/or emergency department care: protocol for a Delphi consensus study.定义需要救护车和/或急诊护理的患者心理失调的概念:德尔菲共识研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 23;14(1):e077666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077666.
6
Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for pre-hospital care.为何无医疗需求的人会被救护车运送?一项关于院前护理指征的研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;14(3):151-6. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3280146508.
7
Delphi consensus study to develop guidelines for the management of adults with borderline personality disorder in the emergency department: a protocol.德尔菲共识研究制定急诊科边缘型人格障碍成人管理指南:方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 9;13(11):e075119. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075119.
8
Can a single primary care paramedic configuration safely transport low-acuity patients in air ambulances?单一的初级护理护理人员配置能否安全地通过空中救护车运送低 acuity 患者? (注:这里“acuity”可能是“急症程度”之类的医学术语,原英文表述不太准确完整,正常应该有更明确关于“低急症程度”的具体所指描述。)
CJEM. 2018 Mar;20(2):247-255. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.392. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
9
Evaluating emergency department transfers from urgent care centres: insights for paramedic integration with subacute healthcare.评估从紧急护理中心转至急诊部的情况:了解护理人员与亚急性医疗保健融合的相关情况。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Mar;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002160.
10
Telehealth-Enabled Emergency Medical Services Program Reduces Ambulance Transport to Urban Emergency Departments.启用远程医疗的紧急医疗服务项目减少了前往城市急诊科的救护车运输量。
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;17(6):713-720. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.8.30660. Epub 2016 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of family health centres in preventing paediatric emergency department usage of parents of children with non-urgent conditions.家庭健康中心在预防非紧急情况儿童家长带孩子使用儿科急诊科方面的作用。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02673-1.
2
Development and Application of an Attribute-Based Taxonomy on the Benefits of Oral Anticoagulant Switching in Atrial Fibrillation: A Delphi Study.基于属性的房颤患者口服抗凝药物转换获益分类法的制定与应用:一项德尔菲研究。
Adv Ther. 2024 Jun;41(6):2352-2366. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02859-0. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
3
Validating the Emergency Department Avoidability Classification (EDAC): A cluster randomized single-blinded agreement study.验证急诊可避免性分类(EDAC):一项集群随机单盲一致性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 23;19(1):e0297689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297689. eCollection 2024.
4
Inclusion of patient-level emergency department characteristics to classify potentially redirectable visits to subacute care: a modified Delphi consensus study.纳入患者层面的急诊科特征,以对潜在可转至亚急性护理的就诊进行分类:一项改良 Delphi 共识研究。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Jan 24;11(1):E70-E76. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220062. Print 2023 Jan-Feb.
5
Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol.验证一种分类方法,以确定适合亚急性和虚拟护理模式的急诊科就诊:一项随机单盲一致性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 16;12(12):e068488. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068488.
6
Identifying patient characteristics associated with potentially redirectable paramedic transported emergency department visits in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study.识别与加拿大安大略省潜在可重新定向的护理人员转运急诊科就诊相关的患者特征:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 30;11(12):e054625. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054625.
7
Emergency department interventions that could be conducted in subacute care settings for patients with nonemergent conditions transported by paramedics: a modified Delphi study.经急救人员运送的非紧急状况患者在亚急性护理环境中可进行的急诊干预:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Jan 11;10(1):E1-E7. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210148. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.
8
Examining the association between paramedic transport to the emergency department and hospital admission: a population-based cohort study.考察急救员转运至急诊科与住院之间的关联:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 12;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00507-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased access to urgent care centers decreases low acuity diagnoses in a nearby hospital emergency department.增加紧急护理中心的就诊机会可降低附近医院急诊部门的低 acuity 诊断率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Mar;37(3):486-488. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
2
Applying hospital evidence to paramedicine: issues of indirectness, validity and knowledge translation.将医院证据应用于护理急救:间接性、有效性及知识转化问题。
CJEM. 2015 May;17(3):281-5. doi: 10.1017/cem.2015.65.
3
Acceptability of Alternatives to Traditional Emergency Care: Patient Characteristics, Alternate Transport Modes, and Alternate Destinations.传统急诊护理替代方案的可接受性:患者特征、替代运输方式及替代目的地
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015;19(4):516-23. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1025156. Epub 2015 May 22.
4
Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales.分析和解释李克特量表的数据。
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec;5(4):541-2. doi: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18.
5
Emergency department overcrowding and access block.急诊科过度拥挤与就诊受阻。
CJEM. 2013 Nov;15(6):359-84. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500002451.
6
Quantifying the proportion of general practice and low-acuity patients in the emergency department.量化急诊科普通科和低危患者的比例。
Med J Aust. 2013 Jun 17;198(11):612-5. doi: 10.5694/mja12.11754.
7
Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review.运用和报告德尔菲法选择医疗质量指标:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
8
Frequency and pattern of emergency department visits by long-term care residents--a population-based study.长期护理居民急诊就诊的频率和模式——一项基于人群的研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar;58(3):510-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02736.x.
9
Ambulatory care sensitive conditions: terminology and disease coding need to be more specific to aid policy makers and clinicians.门诊护理敏感型疾病:术语和疾病编码需要更具体,以帮助政策制定者和临床医生。
Public Health. 2009 Feb;123(2):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.11.001. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
10
Frequency, determinants and impact of overcrowding in emergency departments in Canada: a national survey.加拿大急诊科过度拥挤的频率、决定因素及影响:一项全国性调查。
Healthc Q. 2007;10(4):32-40. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2007.19312.