Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Physiotherapy Department, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Acta Oncol. 2021 Mar;60(3):379-391. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1862422. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
Lymphoedema may develop as a result of numerous genetic and traumatic causes; however, treatment for cancer is the most common cause of its development in more economically developed nations. This systematic review critically appraised, compared and summarised the measurement properties of lymphoedema-specific self-reported questionnaires (SRQs) measuring various patient-reported outcomes including quality of life (QOL), function, morbidity, and symptoms.
Seven databases were searched to identify studies of the measurement properties of SRQs. Two review teams independently evaluated the quality of the individual studies using the risk of bias tool from the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). Measurement properties of the SRQs presented in the studies were then rated. Study level ratings were summarised for an SRQ if they were reported in multiple studies, and their overall quality of the evidence were then graded.
Forty articles, reporting on 19 SRQs were identified from 8615 records. The focus of the 19 SRQs included eight on QOL, four on symptoms, two on function, and two on impairment. The other three SRQs were on illness perception, self-efficacy, and patient-relevant treatment benefit, respectively. Eight and three SRQs were upper limb and lower limb-specific, respectively, whereas seven questionnaires were for both upper and lower limb lymphoedema. One SRQ was developed for head and neck lymphoedema. According to the COSMIN framework, none of the SRQs reviewed had sufficient evidence to support all nine measurement properties. In lower limb questionnaires, the LYMQOL-leg has sufficient content, structural, and construct validity as well as internal consistency and reliability. For upper limb lymphoedema questionnaires, the Lymph-ICF-UL had sufficient content and construct validity as well as reliability.
LYMQOL-leg SRQ is recommended with confidence for evaluation of QOL of people with lower limb lymphoedema while the Lymph-ICF-UL is recommended for evaluation of the QOL of the breast cancer-related lymphoedema with some confidence. In view of the high level of the indeterminate ratings of the measurement properties of the existing SRQs, further research is desirable.
淋巴水肿可能由许多遗传和创伤性原因引起;然而,在经济较发达的国家,癌症治疗是其发展的最常见原因。本系统评价批判性地评估、比较和总结了测量各种患者报告结局的淋巴水肿特异性自我报告问卷(SRQ)的测量特性,包括生活质量(QOL)、功能、发病率和症状。
检索了 7 个数据库,以确定关于 SRQ 测量特性的研究。两个审查小组使用共识基础健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)的偏倚风险工具独立评估了各个研究的质量。然后对研究中报告的 SRQ 的测量特性进行了评价。如果在多个研究中报告了 SRQ 的研究水平评价,则对其进行总结,并对其证据的总体质量进行分级。
从 8615 条记录中确定了 40 篇文章,报道了 19 个 SRQ。19 个 SRQ 的重点包括 8 个关于生活质量,4 个关于症状,2 个关于功能,2 个关于损伤。另外三个 SRQ 分别是疾病认知、自我效能和患者相关的治疗获益。8 个和 3 个 SRQ 分别是上肢和下肢特异性的,而 7 个问卷是用于上肢和下肢淋巴水肿的。一个 SRQ 是为头颈部淋巴水肿开发的。根据 COSMIN 框架,没有一个 SRQ 有足够的证据支持所有 9 个测量特性。在下肢问卷中,LYMQOL-leg 具有足够的内容、结构和构念效度以及内部一致性和可靠性。对于上肢淋巴水肿问卷,Lymph-ICF-UL 具有足够的内容和构念效度以及可靠性。
LYMQOL-leg SRQ 被推荐用于评估下肢淋巴水肿患者的生活质量,具有一定的信心,而 Lymph-ICF-UL 被推荐用于评估乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的生活质量,具有一定的信心。鉴于现有 SRQ 测量特性的不确定评价水平较高,需要进一步研究。