Jung James J, Jackson Timothy, Gordon Lauren, Hutter Matthew M
Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):753-763. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08264-2. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
Gastrointestinal leaks after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) occur infrequently but lead to clinical and socioeconomic burden on patients. Surgeons perform intraoperative leak test (IOLT) via gastric tube or endoscopy to help prevent postoperative leaks. However, there is knowledge gap in the literature on effectiveness of IOLT during bariatric surgery.
In this observational cohort study using the 2015-2017 MBSAQIP database, we compared the outcomes in patients who received IOLT with those who did not during primary or revision RYGB and SG. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative leak. Secondary outcomes were procedure duration and the rates of 30-day postoperative bleed, readmission, reoperation and intervention. Propensity score matching was used to assemble cohorts of patients with similar baseline characteristics.
Among 363,042 patients, 82% underwent IOLT. Four subgroups of patients who underwent operations with or without IOLT during primary RYGB (n = 13,756), primary SG (n = 110,810), revision RYGB (n = 1140), and revision SG (n = 5576) had similar propensity scores and were matched 1:1. Patients who underwent IOLT had similar postoperative leak rates compared to those who did not (Primary RYGB with IOLT 0.7% v. without IOLT 0.6%; Primary SG 0.4% v. 0.3%; Revision RYGB 2.3% v. 1.0%; Revision SG 1.1% v. 0.7%). In primary SG subgroup, patients who underwent IOLT had lower postoperative bleed rates (0.6% v. 0.8%, p = 0.002). In primary RYGB and SG subgroups, operations with IOLT were slightly longer.
Postoperative leak rates after primary and revision bariatric surgery were low and similar irrespective of IOLT. Patients who had IOLT during primary SG had lower postoperative bleed rates. Current judgment as to whether to perform an IOLT leads to excellent outcomes, and thus, current practices should continue. However, one should consider an IOLT during primary SG, not necessarily to reduce leak rates but to help reduce postoperative bleeding occurrences.
Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)和袖状胃切除术(SG)后胃肠道漏发生率较低,但会给患者带来临床和社会经济负担。外科医生通过胃管或内镜进行术中漏诊试验(IOLT)以帮助预防术后漏诊。然而,关于减肥手术中IOLT有效性的文献存在知识空白。
在这项使用2015 - 2017年MBSAQIP数据库的观察性队列研究中,我们比较了在初次或翻修RYGB和SG期间接受IOLT的患者与未接受IOLT的患者的结局。主要结局是术后30天漏诊。次要结局是手术时间以及术后30天出血、再入院、再次手术和干预的发生率。使用倾向评分匹配来组建具有相似基线特征的患者队列。
在363,042例患者中,82%接受了IOLT。在初次RYGB(n = 13,756)、初次SG(n = 110,810)、翻修RYGB(n = 1140)和翻修SG(n = 5576)期间接受或未接受IOLT手术的患者的四个亚组具有相似的倾向评分,并按1:1进行匹配。与未接受IOLT的患者相比,接受IOLT的患者术后漏诊率相似(初次RYGB接受IOLT为0.7%,未接受IOLT为0.6%;初次SG为0.4%对0.3%;翻修RYGB为2.3%对1.0%;翻修SG为1.1%对0.7%)。在初次SG亚组中,接受IOLT的患者术后出血率较低(0.6%对0.8%,p = 0.002)。在初次RYGB和SG亚组中,进行IOLT的手术时间稍长。
无论是否进行IOLT,初次和翻修减肥手术后的术后漏诊率都较低且相似。初次SG期间接受IOLT的患者术后出血率较低。目前关于是否进行IOLT的判断能带来良好结局,因此,当前的做法应继续。然而,在初次SG期间应考虑进行IOLT,不一定是为了降低漏诊率,而是为了帮助减少术后出血的发生。