Suppr超能文献

脓毒症合并既往或急性心力衰竭患者使用去甲肾上腺素、多巴胺和血管加压素:一项回顾性队列研究

Norepinephrine, Dopamine, and Vasopressin in Patients with Sepsis and Preexisting or Acute Heart Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Zhou Dandan, Zhu Baohua, Jiang Jie, Zhou Guangquan, Zhou Suming

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Integration of Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (mainland).

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Nanjing Central Hospital (Nanjing Municipal Government Hospital), Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China (mainland).

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2021 Jan 21;27:e927716. doi: 10.12659/MSM.927716.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the impact of norepinephrine (NE), norepinephrine plus vasopressin (NE+VAS) and dopamine in patients with sepsis and heart failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database, v1.4. Adults aged >18 years in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) who had heart failure and took vasopressors were included. The patients were divided into 3 groups: NE, NE+VAS, and dopamine. Differences in survival, treatment time, and organ function among the 3 groups were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to screen for possible prognostic differences, and regression analysis was used to further analyze and predict prognoses. RESULTS A total of 1864 patients were included. There were significant differences among the 3 groups in 7-, 28-, and 90-day mortality after PSM. The 5-year survival rates among the 3 groups also were significantly different (P<0.001). After Cox regression analysis, NE+VAS was an independent risk factor affecting 5-year survival (P<0.001). After multiple linear regression, dopamine was the factor related to ICU and hospital lengths of stay. CONCLUSIONS Compared with NE or dopamine alone, NE+VAS can reduce survival in patients with sepsis and heart failure who need vasopressors. Compared with the other 2 treatment options, dopamine can shorten ICU and hospital stays for these patients.

摘要

背景 本研究旨在评估去甲肾上腺素(NE)、去甲肾上腺素加血管加压素(NE+VAS)和多巴胺对脓毒症合并心力衰竭患者的影响。

材料与方法 数据取自重症监护医学信息集市III数据库,版本1.4。纳入重症监护病房(ICU)中年龄>18岁、患有心力衰竭且使用血管升压药的成年人。患者分为3组:NE组、NE+VAS组和多巴胺组。比较3组患者在生存率、治疗时间和器官功能方面的差异。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)筛选可能的预后差异,并使用回归分析进一步分析和预测预后。

结果 共纳入1864例患者。PSM后,3组在7天、28天和90天死亡率方面存在显著差异。3组的5年生存率也有显著差异(P<0.001)。经过Cox回归分析,NE+VAS是影响5年生存的独立危险因素(P<0.001)。经过多元线性回归分析,多巴胺是与ICU住院时间和住院总时长相关的因素。

结论 与单独使用NE或多巴胺相比,NE+VAS会降低需要血管升压药的脓毒症合并心力衰竭患者的生存率。与其他两种治疗方案相比,多巴胺可缩短这些患者在ICU的住院时间和住院总时长。

相似文献

3
5
Vasopressor therapy in critically ill patients with shock.
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Nov;45(11):1503-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05801-z. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
6
Norepinephrine and Vasopressin Compared With Norepinephrine and Epinephrine in Adults With Septic Shock.
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Sep;53(9):877-885. doi: 10.1177/1060028019843664. Epub 2019 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Early management of adult sepsis and septic shock: Korean clinical practice guidelines.
Acute Crit Care. 2024 Nov;39(4):445-472. doi: 10.4266/acc.2024.00920. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
4
Dopamine, Immunity, and Disease.
Pharmacol Rev. 2023 Jan;75(1):62-158. doi: 10.1124/pharmrev.122.000618. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
5
Effect Evaluation of Norepinephrine on Cardiac Function in Patients with Sepsis by Cardiac Ultrasound Imaging.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 20;2022:5896791. doi: 10.1155/2022/5896791. eCollection 2022.
6
Fluid resuscitation and outcomes in heart failure patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: A retrospective case-control study.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 19;16(8):e0256368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256368. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Sepsis With Preexisting Heart Failure: Management of Confounding Clinical Features.
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):989-1012. doi: 10.1177/0885066620928299. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
2
Vasopressin versus epinephrine as adjunct vasopressors for septic shock.
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jul;46(7):1484-1485. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06012-7. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
3
What's new in cardiogenic shock?
Intensive Care Med. 2020 May;46(5):1016-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05973-z. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
4
Vasopressor therapy in critically ill patients with shock.
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Nov;45(11):1503-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05801-z. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
6
Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock.
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1400-1426. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5175-z. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
7
Sepsis and septic shock.
Lancet. 2018 Jul 7;392(10141):75-87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30696-2. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
8
A Comparative Analysis of Sepsis Identification Methods in an Electronic Database.
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):494-499. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002965.
10
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验