Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, 15506University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Augusta, GA, USA.
Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, 15506University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, GA, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):989-1012. doi: 10.1177/0885066620928299. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
Preexisting heart failure (HF) in patients with sepsis is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Core sepsis management includes aggressive volume resuscitation followed by vasopressors (and potentially inotropes) if fluid is inadequate to restore perfusion; however, large fluid boluses and vasoactive agents are concerning amid the cardiac dysfunction of HF. This review summarizes evidence regarding the influence of HF on sepsis clinical outcomes, pathophysiologic concerns, resuscitation targets, hemodynamic interventions, and adjunct management (ie, antiarrhythmics, positive pressure ventilatory support, and renal replacement therapy) in patients with sepsis and preexisting HF. Patients with sepsis and preexisting HF receive less fluid during resuscitation; however, evidence suggests traditional fluid resuscitation targets do not increase the risk of adverse events in HF patients with sepsis and likely improve outcomes. Norepinephrine remains the most well-supported vasopressor for patients with sepsis with preexisting HF, while dopamine may induce more cardiac adverse events. Dobutamine should be used cautiously given its generally detrimental effects but may have an application when combined with norepinephrine in patients with low cardiac output. Management of chronic HF medications warrants careful consideration for continuation or discontinuation upon development of sepsis, and β-blockers may be appropriate to continue in the absence of acute hemodynamic decompensation. Optimal management of atrial fibrillation may include β-blockers after acute hemodynamic stabilization as they have also shown independent benefits in sepsis. Positive pressure ventilatory support and renal replacement must be carefully monitored for effects on cardiac function when HF is present.
在脓毒症患者中,预先存在的心力衰竭(HF)与更差的临床结局相关。脓毒症的核心治疗包括积极的容量复苏,如果液体不足以恢复灌注,则使用血管加压剂(和潜在的正性肌力药);然而,在 HF 导致的心脏功能障碍中,大量的液体冲击和血管活性药物令人担忧。这篇综述总结了 HF 对脓毒症临床结局、病理生理问题、复苏目标、血流动力学干预以及在脓毒症和预先存在 HF 患者中的辅助治疗(即抗心律失常药、正压通气支持和肾脏替代治疗)的影响的证据。在脓毒症和预先存在 HF 的患者中,复苏期间接受的液体较少;然而,证据表明,传统的液体复苏目标不会增加 HF 患者脓毒症不良事件的风险,并且可能改善结局。去甲肾上腺素仍然是脓毒症合并预先存在 HF 患者最支持的血管加压药,而多巴胺可能引起更多的心脏不良事件。由于多巴酚丁胺通常具有有害作用,因此应谨慎使用,但其在伴有低心输出量的患者中与去甲肾上腺素联合使用时可能具有应用价值。慢性 HF 药物的管理需要在发生脓毒症时仔细考虑继续或停止使用,并且在没有急性血液动力学失代偿的情况下,β受体阻滞剂可能是合适的。在急性血液动力学稳定后,可考虑使用β受体阻滞剂来优化心房颤动的管理,因为它们在脓毒症中也显示出独立的益处。在存在 HF 时,必须仔细监测正压通气支持和肾脏替代对心脏功能的影响。