Suppr超能文献

预防 COVID-19:系统评价。

Prophylaxis for COVID-19: a systematic review.

机构信息

HIV/AIDS Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

HIV/AIDS Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Apr;27(4):532-537. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While the landscape of vaccine and treatment candidates against the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been reviewed systematically, prophylactic candidates remain unexplored.

OBJECTIVES

To map pre- and postexposure prophylactic (PrEP and PEP) candidate for COVID-19.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed/Medline, Embase, International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform clinical trial registries and medRxiv.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND PARTICIPANTS

All studies in humans or animals and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in humans reporting primary data on prophylactic candidates against COVID-19, excluding studies focused on key populations.

INTERVENTIONS

PrEP and PEP candidate for COVID-19.

METHODS

Systematic review and qualitative synthesis of COVID-19 PrEP and PEP studies and RCTs complemented by search of medRxiv and PubMed and Embase for studies reporting RCT outcomes since systematic review search completion.

RESULTS

We identified 13 studies (from 2119 database records) and 117 RCTs (from 5565 RCTs listed in the registries) that met the inclusion criteria. Non-RCT studies reported on cross-sectional studies using hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in humans (n = 2) or reported on animal studies (n = 7), most of which used antibodies. All five completed RCTs focused on the use of HCQ as either PrEP or PEP, and these and the cross-sectional studies reported no prophylactic effect. The majority of ongoing RCTs evaluated HCQ or other existing candidates including non-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines, anti(retro)virals or use of vitamins and supplements.

CONCLUSIONS

The key message from completed studies and RCTs seems to be that HCQ does not work. There is little evidence regarding other compounds, with all RCTs using candidates other than HCQ still ongoing. It remains to be seen if the portfolio of existing molecules being evaluated in RCTs will identify successful prophylaxis against COVID-19 or if there is a need for the development of new candidates.

摘要

背景

虽然已经系统地综述了针对新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的疫苗和治疗候选药物,但预防性候选药物仍未得到探索。

目的

绘制针对 COVID-19 的预防用(PrEP 和 PEP)候选药物图谱。

数据来源

PubMed/Medline、Embase、国际医学期刊编辑委员会和国际临床试验注册平台临床试验注册处以及 medRxiv。

研究入选标准和参与者

所有报告针对 COVID-19 的预防候选药物的人体或动物研究以及人体随机对照试验(RCT),不包括专注于关键人群的研究。

干预措施

针对 COVID-19 的 PrEP 和 PEP 候选药物。

方法

对 COVID-19 PrEP 和 PEP 研究和 RCT 进行系统评价和定性综合,辅以对 medRxiv 和 PubMed 以及 Embase 的搜索,以获取自系统评价搜索完成以来报告 RCT 结果的研究。

结果

我们确定了 13 项研究(来自 2119 条数据库记录)和 117 项 RCT(来自 5565 项列出的 RCTs)符合纳入标准。非 RCT 研究报告了使用羟氯喹(HCQ)的人类横断面研究(n=2)或报告了动物研究(n=7),其中大多数使用了抗体。所有五项已完成的 RCT 都专注于将 HCQ 用作 PrEP 或 PEP,这些以及横断面研究都没有报告预防作用。大多数正在进行的 RCT 评估了 HCQ 或其他现有候选药物,包括非严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗、抗(逆转录)病毒或使用维生素和补充剂。

结论

从已完成的研究和 RCT 中得出的主要信息似乎是 HCQ 不起作用。关于其他化合物的证据很少,所有使用 HCQ 以外的候选药物的 RCT 仍在进行中。尚不清楚正在 RCT 中评估的现有分子组合是否会确定针对 COVID-19 的成功预防,或者是否需要开发新的候选药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae2a/7813508/92a450a4ae5e/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验