Department of Anesthesiology, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;70(5):413-421. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722314. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
Paravertebral block (PVB) and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) are commonly used for postthoracotomy pain management. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effects of TEA versus PVB for postthoracotomy pain relief.
A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (last performed on August 2020) to identify randomized controlled trials comparing PVB and TEA for thoracotomy. The rest and dynamic visual analog scale (VAS) scores, rescue analgesic consumption, the incidences of side effects were pooled.
Sixteen trials involving 1,000 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that the rest and dynamic VAS at 12, 24, and rest VAS at 48 hours were similar between PVB and TEA groups. The rescue analgesic consumption (weighted mean differences: 3.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.982-6.638, < 0.01) and the incidence of rescue analgesia (relative risk [RR]: 1.963; 95% CI: 1.336-2.884, < 0.01) were less in TEA group. However, the incidence of hypotension (RR: 0.228; 95% CI: 0.137-0.380, < 0.001), urinary retention (RR: 0.392; 95% CI: 0.198-0.776, < 0.01), and vomiting (RR: 0.665; 95% CI: 0.451-0.981, < 0.05) was less in PVB group.
For thoracotomy, PVB may provide no superior analgesia compared with TEA but PVB can reduce side effects. Thus, individualized treatment is recommended. Further study is still necessary to determine which concentration of local anesthetics can be used for PVB and can provide equal analgesic efficiency to TEA.
椎旁阻滞(PVB)和胸硬膜外镇痛(TEA)常用于开胸术后疼痛管理。本研究旨在评估 TEA 与 PVB 用于开胸术后止痛的效果。
系统检索 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library(截至 2020 年 8 月)中比较 PVB 和 TEA 用于开胸手术的随机对照试验。汇总休息和动态视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、解救性镇痛药物消耗、不良反应发生率。
纳入 16 项试验共 1000 例患者。汇总结果显示,PVB 和 TEA 组在 12、24 小时的静息和动态 VAS 评分及 48 小时的静息 VAS 评分相似。解救性镇痛药物消耗(加权均数差:3.81;95%置信区间[CI]:0.982-6.638, < 0.01)和解救性镇痛发生率(相对危险度[RR]:1.963;95% CI:1.336-2.884, < 0.01)较低,但 TEA 组低血压发生率(RR:0.228;95% CI:0.137-0.380, < 0.001)、尿潴留发生率(RR:0.392;95% CI:0.198-0.776, < 0.01)和呕吐发生率(RR:0.665;95% CI:0.451-0.981, < 0.05)较低。
对于开胸手术,PVB 与 TEA 相比可能提供的镇痛效果没有优势,但 PVB 可以减少不良反应。因此,建议个体化治疗。仍需进一步研究确定 PVB 中使用哪种浓度的局部麻醉剂可以提供与 TEA 相等的镇痛效果。