• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经胸壁肋间神经阻滞与胸椎硬膜外镇痛用于开胸术后镇痛的效果比较:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析

Paravertebral Block versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Postthoracotomy Pain Relief: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;70(5):413-421. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722314. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1722314
PMID:33477177
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Paravertebral block (PVB) and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) are commonly used for postthoracotomy pain management. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effects of TEA versus PVB for postthoracotomy pain relief.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (last performed on August 2020) to identify randomized controlled trials comparing PVB and TEA for thoracotomy. The rest and dynamic visual analog scale (VAS) scores, rescue analgesic consumption, the incidences of side effects were pooled.

RESULTS

Sixteen trials involving 1,000 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that the rest and dynamic VAS at 12, 24, and rest VAS at 48 hours were similar between PVB and TEA groups. The rescue analgesic consumption (weighted mean differences: 3.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.982-6.638,  < 0.01) and the incidence of rescue analgesia (relative risk [RR]: 1.963; 95% CI: 1.336-2.884,  < 0.01) were less in TEA group. However, the incidence of hypotension (RR: 0.228; 95% CI: 0.137-0.380,  < 0.001), urinary retention (RR: 0.392; 95% CI: 0.198-0.776,  < 0.01), and vomiting (RR: 0.665; 95% CI: 0.451-0.981,  < 0.05) was less in PVB group.

CONCLUSION

For thoracotomy, PVB may provide no superior analgesia compared with TEA but PVB can reduce side effects. Thus, individualized treatment is recommended. Further study is still necessary to determine which concentration of local anesthetics can be used for PVB and can provide equal analgesic efficiency to TEA.

摘要

目的

椎旁阻滞(PVB)和胸硬膜外镇痛(TEA)常用于开胸术后疼痛管理。本研究旨在评估 TEA 与 PVB 用于开胸术后止痛的效果。

方法

系统检索 PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library(截至 2020 年 8 月)中比较 PVB 和 TEA 用于开胸手术的随机对照试验。汇总休息和动态视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、解救性镇痛药物消耗、不良反应发生率。

结果

纳入 16 项试验共 1000 例患者。汇总结果显示,PVB 和 TEA 组在 12、24 小时的静息和动态 VAS 评分及 48 小时的静息 VAS 评分相似。解救性镇痛药物消耗(加权均数差:3.81;95%置信区间[CI]:0.982-6.638, < 0.01)和解救性镇痛发生率(相对危险度[RR]:1.963;95% CI:1.336-2.884, < 0.01)较低,但 TEA 组低血压发生率(RR:0.228;95% CI:0.137-0.380, < 0.001)、尿潴留发生率(RR:0.392;95% CI:0.198-0.776, < 0.01)和呕吐发生率(RR:0.665;95% CI:0.451-0.981, < 0.05)较低。

结论

对于开胸手术,PVB 与 TEA 相比可能提供的镇痛效果没有优势,但 PVB 可以减少不良反应。因此,建议个体化治疗。仍需进一步研究确定 PVB 中使用哪种浓度的局部麻醉剂可以提供与 TEA 相等的镇痛效果。

相似文献

1
Paravertebral Block versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Postthoracotomy Pain Relief: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.经胸壁肋间神经阻滞与胸椎硬膜外镇痛用于开胸术后镇痛的效果比较:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Aug;70(5):413-421. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722314. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy.开胸手术患者的椎旁阻滞与胸段硬膜外阻滞比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 21;2(2):CD009121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009121.pub2.
3
Analgesic efficacy and safety of thoracic paravertebral and epidural analgesia for thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.胸椎旁神经阻滞和硬膜外镇痛用于胸科手术的镇痛效果及安全性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 May;18(5):626-35. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt551. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
4
Postoperative analgesic effects of paravertebral block versus erector spinae plane block for thoracic and breast surgery: A meta-analysis.胸椎和乳腺手术后椎旁阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞的术后镇痛效果:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 25;16(8):e0256611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256611. eCollection 2021.
5
Assessment of Intercostal Nerve Block Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估肋间神经阻滞镇痛在胸外科手术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133394. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33394.
6
A systematic review of comparative studies indicates that paravertebral block is neither superior nor safer than epidural analgesia for pain after thoracotomy.一项对比较研究的系统评价表明,对于开胸术后疼痛,椎旁阻滞并不比硬膜外镇痛更具优势,也不比其更安全。
Scand J Pain. 2010 Jan 1;1(1):12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2009.10.003.
7
A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.开胸手术中椎旁阻滞与硬膜外阻滞镇痛效果及副作用的比较——随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Br J Anaesth. 2006 Apr;96(4):418-26. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael020. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
8
Paravertebral Block for Inguinal Herniorrhaphy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.经椎间孔入路腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:一项系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Aug;121(2):556-69. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000835.
9
A comparison of the analgesia efficacy and side effects of paravertebral compared with epidural blockade for thoracotomy: an updated meta-analysis.经更新的荟萃分析:与硬膜外阻滞相比,椎旁阻滞用于剖胸术的镇痛效果和副作用比较。
PLoS One. 2014 May 5;9(5):e96233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096233. eCollection 2014.
10
Combined paravertebral and intrathecal vs thoracic epidural analgesia for post-thoracotomy pain relief.胸段硬膜外与椎旁联合阻滞和鞘内阻滞用于开胸术后镇痛。
Br J Anaesth. 2013 Mar;110(3):443-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes394. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Paravertebral Block versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia and Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.椎旁阻滞与竖脊肌平面阻滞用于术后镇痛和恢复:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Pain Res. 2025 Sep 2;18:4509-4526. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S537574. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block on the quality of recovery after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.超声引导下胸段椎旁神经阻滞对电视辅助胸腔镜手术后恢复质量的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Perioper Med (Lond). 2025 Aug 7;14(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13741-025-00536-6.
3
Analgesic efficacy of continuous serratus anterior plane block versus intercostal nerve block and their combination in VATS lobectomy: results from a prospective randomized trial.
连续前锯肌平面阻滞与肋间神经阻滞及其联合应用在电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果
Front Surg. 2025 May 27;12:1607150. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1607150. eCollection 2025.
4
Adding Dexmedetomidine to Methylene Blue in Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Video-Assisted Lobectomy: A Case Series Study.在电视辅助肺叶切除术中,在胸椎旁神经阻滞中添加右美托咪定至亚甲蓝:一项病例系列研究。
Local Reg Anesth. 2024 Dec 11;17:99-105. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S487981. eCollection 2024.
5
Effects of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Anesthesia on Agitation and Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy during Recovery.不同剂量右美托咪定联合胸椎旁神经阻滞麻醉对开胸手术患者苏醒期躁动及血流动力学的影响
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jun 29;2022:7804584. doi: 10.1155/2022/7804584. eCollection 2022.