• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于屠宰场的猪福利评估措施:对欧洲屠宰场采用方法的分析

Abattoir-Based Measures to Assess Swine Welfare: Analysis of the Methods Adopted in European Slaughterhouses.

作者信息

De Luca Silvio, Zanardi Emanuela, Alborali Giovanni Loris, Ianieri Adriana, Ghidini Sergio

机构信息

Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Via del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy.

Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna-Headquarters, Via A. Bianchi, 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 18;11(1):226. doi: 10.3390/ani11010226.

DOI:10.3390/ani11010226
PMID:33477630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7831492/
Abstract

The assessment of swine welfare requires feasible, reliable, and reasonable indicators. On-farm evaluation of pig welfare can provide valuable information to veterinarians and farmers. However, such protocols can result expensive and time-consuming. With this regard, an interest in the appraisal of swine welfare at abattoir has grown over the recent years. In particular, the use of certain lesions collected directly from slaughtered animals to determine the welfare status of pigs has been evaluated by several authors. In the present review, the different methods developed to score lesions collected directly from the body and the viscera of animals slaughtered in European abattoirs ("abattoir-based measures") are presented. The text specifically focuses on the methods currently available in the literature for the scoring of body, pluck and gastric lesions during post-mortem activities. Moreover, the strengths and weaknesses of abattoir-based measures schemes are discussed. To conclude, the future perspectives of the assessment of pig welfare at the slaughterhouse are described, appealing for a benchmarking system that can be systematically used by veterinarians and other professional figures involved in the process.

摘要

猪福利的评估需要可行、可靠且合理的指标。农场内对猪福利的评估可为兽医和养殖户提供有价值的信息。然而,此类方案可能成本高昂且耗时。鉴于此,近年来人们对在屠宰场评估猪福利的兴趣与日俱增。特别是,几位作者已对直接从屠宰动物身上采集某些病变来确定猪的福利状况进行了评估。在本综述中,介绍了为对直接从欧洲屠宰场宰杀动物的身体和内脏采集的病变进行评分而开发的不同方法(“基于屠宰场的措施”)。本文具体聚焦于文献中目前可用于在宰后活动中对身体、内脏和胃部病变进行评分的方法。此外,还讨论了基于屠宰场的措施方案的优缺点。最后,描述了屠宰场猪福利评估的未来前景,呼吁建立一个可供兽医和参与该过程的其他专业人员系统使用的基准系统。

相似文献

1
Abattoir-Based Measures to Assess Swine Welfare: Analysis of the Methods Adopted in European Slaughterhouses.基于屠宰场的猪福利评估措施:对欧洲屠宰场采用方法的分析
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 18;11(1):226. doi: 10.3390/ani11010226.
2
Animal-based measures on fattening heavy pigs at the slaughterhouse and the association with animal welfare at the farm level: a preliminary study.屠宰场育肥肥猪的基于动物的措施及其与农场动物福利的关联:一项初步研究。
Animal. 2020 Jan;14(1):108-118. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119001320. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
The British pig health schemes: integrated systems for large-scale pig abattoir lesion monitoring.英国猪健康计划:大规模屠宰场病变监测的综合系统。
Vet Rec. 2011 Oct 15;169(16):413. doi: 10.1136/vr.d4814. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
4
Effects of scalding and dehairing of pig carcasses at abattoirs on the visibility of welfare-related lesions.屠宰场猪胴体烫毛和脱毛对福利相关损伤可见性的影响。
Animal. 2016 Mar;10(3):460-7. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115002037. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
5
Benchmarking of pluck lesions at slaughter as a health monitoring tool for pigs slaughtered at 170kg (heavy pigs).将屠宰时采集的病变作为170千克体重猪(肥猪)屠宰时健康监测工具的基准测试
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Sep 1;144:20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 13.
6
A systematic review of animal based indicators of sheep welfare on farm, at market and during transport, and qualitative appraisal of their validity and feasibility for use in UK abattoirs.对农场、市场和运输过程中绵羊福利基于动物的指标进行系统综述,并对其在英国屠宰场使用的有效性和可行性进行定性评估。
Vet J. 2015 Dec;206(3):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
7
Pigs' capacity to experience feelings and to suffer from tail lesion, ear lesion and lameness: Exploring citizens and pig farm and abattoir workers' knowledge and perceptions.猪感受情感和遭受尾巴损伤、耳朵损伤和跛行的能力:探究市民、养猪场和屠宰场工人的知识和看法。
PLoS One. 2023 May 25;18(5):e0286188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286188. eCollection 2023.
8
Comparing Visual-Only and Visual-Palpation Post-Mortem Lung Scoring Systems in Slaughtering Pigs.屠宰猪时视觉评分与视觉触诊相结合的宰后肺脏评分系统比较
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 26;13(15):2419. doi: 10.3390/ani13152419.
9
Validation of carcass lesions as indicators for on-farm health and welfare of pigs.胴体损伤作为猪场内健康和福利指标的验证
J Anim Sci. 2017 Apr;95(4):1528-1536. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1180.
10
The capacity of inspection on farm and at the abattoir to predict post-mortem outcomes in slaughter pigs: A study at animal level.养殖场和屠宰场检查预测屠宰猪死后结果的能力:一项在动物层面的研究。
Anim Sci J. 2023 Jan-Dec;94(1):e13798. doi: 10.1111/asj.13798.

引用本文的文献

1
Detecting ear lesions in slaughtered pigs through open-source convolutional neural networks.通过开源卷积神经网络检测屠宰猪的耳部病变
Porcine Health Manag. 2025 May 23;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40813-025-00442-9.
2
Osteomyelitis in Pig Carcasses at a Portuguese Slaughterhouse: Association with Tail-Biting and Teeth Resection.葡萄牙一家屠宰场猪胴体中的骨髓炎:与咬尾和牙齿切除的关联。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jun 15;14(12):1794. doi: 10.3390/ani14121794.
3
An Integrated Analysis of Abattoir Lung Lesion Scores and Antimicrobial Use in Italian Heavy Pig Finishing Farms.意大利大型生猪育肥场屠宰场肺部病变评分与抗菌药物使用情况的综合分析
Animals (Basel). 2024 May 30;14(11):1621. doi: 10.3390/ani14111621.
4
Feasibility of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in the Classification of Pig Lung Lesions.近红外光谱技术在猪肺病变分类中的可行性
Vet Sci. 2024 Apr 18;11(4):181. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11040181.
5
Opportunities for Regulatory Authorities to Assess Animal-Based Measures at the Slaughterhouse Using Sensor Technology and Artificial Intelligence: A Review.监管机构利用传感器技术和人工智能评估屠宰场基于动物的措施的机会:综述
Animals (Basel). 2023 Sep 26;13(19):3028. doi: 10.3390/ani13193028.
6
Comparison between two scoring methods to assess tail damage of docked pig carcasses during postmortem inspection in Ireland.爱尔兰宰后检验中两种评估去尾猪胴体尾部损伤评分方法的比较。
Vet Rec Open. 2023 Aug 21;10(2):e66. doi: 10.1002/vro2.66. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Comparing Visual-Only and Visual-Palpation Post-Mortem Lung Scoring Systems in Slaughtering Pigs.屠宰猪时视觉评分与视觉触诊相结合的宰后肺脏评分系统比较
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jul 26;13(15):2419. doi: 10.3390/ani13152419.
8
Undocked Tails, Mycoplasma-like Lesions and Gastric Ulcers in Slaughtering Pigs: What Connection?屠宰猪的断尾、支原体样病变和胃溃疡:有何关联?
Animals (Basel). 2023 Jan 15;13(2):305. doi: 10.3390/ani13020305.
9
Practical Application of the Five Domains Animal Welfare Framework for Supply Food Animal Chain Managers.五领域动物福利框架在供应食用动物产业链管理者中的实际应用
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 18;12(20):2831. doi: 10.3390/ani12202831.
10
The Research Progress of Vision-Based Artificial Intelligence in Smart Pig Farming.基于视觉的人工智能在智慧养猪中的研究进展。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 30;22(17):6541. doi: 10.3390/s22176541.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Animal-Based Pig Welfare Outcomes on Farm and at the Abattoir: A Case Study.农场和屠宰场基于动物的猪福利成果评估:一个案例研究。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 5;7:576942. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.576942. eCollection 2020.
2
Intact Tails as a Welfare Indicator in Finishing Pigs? Scoring of Tail Lesions and Defining Intact Tails in Undocked Pigs at the Abattoir.完整尾巴作为育肥猪福利指标?屠宰场中未断尾猪尾巴损伤评分及完整尾巴的定义
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jul 16;7:405. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00405. eCollection 2020.
3
Skin Temperature of Slaughter Pigs With Tail Lesions.有尾部病变的屠宰猪的皮肤温度
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Apr 30;7:198. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00198. eCollection 2020.
4
Scoring pleurisy in slaughtered pigs using convolutional neural networks.使用卷积神经网络对屠宰猪进行胸膜炎评分。
Vet Res. 2020 Apr 10;51(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13567-020-00775-z.
5
Effects of Transport and Lairage on the Skin Damage of Pig Carcasses.运输和牲畜圈养对猪胴体皮肤损伤的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 29;10(4):575. doi: 10.3390/ani10040575.
6
The Impact of Grouping on Skin Lesions and Meat Quality of Pig Carcasses.分组对猪胴体皮肤损伤和肉质的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 25;10(4):544. doi: 10.3390/ani10040544.
7
Consumers' Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare.消费者对农场动物福利的关注与认知。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 27;10(3):385. doi: 10.3390/ani10030385.
8
Animal-based measures on fattening heavy pigs at the slaughterhouse and the association with animal welfare at the farm level: a preliminary study.屠宰场育肥肥猪的基于动物的措施及其与农场动物福利的关联:一项初步研究。
Animal. 2020 Jan;14(1):108-118. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119001320. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
9
Efforts to Ban the Routine Tail Docking of Pigs and to Give Pigs Enrichment Materials via EU Law: Where do We Stand a Quarter of a Century on?通过欧盟法律禁止常规猪尾 docking 并为猪提供丰富材料的努力:二十五年过去了,我们现在处于什么状况? (注:“tail docking”直译为“尾巴截断”,这里结合语境意译为“猪尾 docking”,具体准确含义需结合专业知识进一步明确)
Animals (Basel). 2019 Mar 29;9(4):132. doi: 10.3390/ani9040132.
10
'Phasing out pig tail docking in the EU - present state, challenges and possibilities'.欧盟逐步淘汰猪尾巴剪短术——现状、挑战与可能性
Porcine Health Manag. 2018 Nov 16;4:27. doi: 10.1186/s40813-018-0103-8. eCollection 2018.