Suppr超能文献

非缺血性心肌病患者左心室射血分数和心肌瘢痕与长期死亡风险及死亡方式的关系

Relationship of LVEF and Myocardial Scar to Long-Term Mortality Risk and Mode of Death in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.

作者信息

Klem Igor, Klein Michael, Khan Mohammad, Yang Eric Y, Nabi Faisal, Ivanov Alexander, Bhatti Lubna, Hayes Brenda, Graviss Edward A, Nguyen Duc T, Judd Robert M, Kim Raymond J, Heitner John F, Shah Dipan J

机构信息

Duke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center (I.K., L.B., B.H., R.M.J., R.J.K.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Division of Cardiology (I.K., R.M.J., R.J.K.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Circulation. 2021 Apr 6;143(14):1343-1358. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048477. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nonischemic cardiomyopathy is a leading cause of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and is associated with high mortality risk from progressive heart failure and arrhythmias. Myocardial scar on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is increasingly recognized as a risk marker for adverse outcomes; however, left ventricular dysfunction remains the basis for determining a patient's eligibility for primary prophylaxis with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. We investigated the relationship of LVEF and scar with long-term mortality and mode of death in a large cohort of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

METHODS

This study is a prospective, longitudinal outcomes registry of 1020 consecutive patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent clinical cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of LVEF and scar at 3 centers.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 5.2 (interquartile range, 3.8, 6.6) years, 277 (27%) patients died. On survival analysis, LVEF ≤35% and scar were strongly associated with all-cause (log-rank test =0.002 and <0.001, respectively) and cardiac death (=0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Whereas scar was strongly related to sudden cardiac death (SCD; =0.001), there was no significant association between LVEF ≤35% and SCD risk (=0.57). On multivariable analysis including established clinical factors, LVEF and scar are independent risk markers of all-cause and cardiac death. The addition of LVEF provided incremental prognostic value but insignificant discrimination improvement by C-statistic for all-cause and cardiac death, but no incremental prognostic value for SCD. Conversely, scar extent demonstrated significant incremental prognostic value and discrimination improvement for all 3 end points. On net reclassification analysis, the addition of LVEF resulted in no significant improvement for all-cause death (11.0%; 95% CI, -6.2% to 25.9%), cardiac death (9.8%; 95% CI, -5.7% to 29.3%), or SCD (7.5%; 95% CI, -41.2% to 42.9%). Conversely, the addition of scar extent resulted in significant reclassification improvement of 25.5% (95% CI, 11.7% to 41.0%) for all-cause death, 27.0% (95% CI, 11.6% to 45.2%) for cardiac death, and 40.6% (95% CI, 10.5% to 71.8%) for SCD.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial scar and LVEF are both risk markers for all-cause and cardiac death in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. However, whereas myocardial scar has strong and incremental prognostic value for SCD risk stratification, LVEF has no incremental prognostic value over clinical measures. Scar assessment should be incorporated into patient selection criteria for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement.

摘要

背景

非缺血性心肌病是导致左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低的主要原因,与进行性心力衰竭和心律失常导致的高死亡风险相关。心血管磁共振成像上的心肌瘢痕越来越被认为是不良结局的风险标志物;然而,左心室功能障碍仍然是确定患者是否适合植入式心律转复除颤器一级预防的基础。我们在一大群非缺血性心肌病患者中研究了LVEF和瘢痕与长期死亡率及死亡方式的关系。

方法

本研究是一项前瞻性、纵向结局登记研究,纳入了1020例连续的非缺血性心肌病患者,他们在3个中心接受了临床心血管磁共振成像以评估LVEF和瘢痕。

结果

在中位随访5.2(四分位间距,3.8,6.6)年期间,277例(27%)患者死亡。生存分析显示,LVEF≤35%和瘢痕均与全因死亡(对数秩检验分别为=0.002和<0.001)及心源性死亡(分别为=0.001和<0.001)密切相关。虽然瘢痕与心源性猝死(SCD;=0.001)密切相关,但LVEF≤35%与SCD风险之间无显著关联(=0.57)。在包括既定临床因素的多变量分析中,LVEF和瘢痕是全因死亡和心源性死亡的独立风险标志物。LVEF的加入提供了增量预后价值,但对全因死亡和心源性死亡的C统计量判别改善不显著,对SCD无增量预后价值。相反,瘢痕范围对所有3个终点均显示出显著的增量预后价值和判别改善。净重新分类分析显示,加入LVEF对全因死亡(11.0%;95%CI,-6.2%至25.9%)、心源性死亡(9.8%;95%CI,-5.7%至29.3%)或SCD(7.5%;95%CI,-41.2%至42.9%)均无显著改善。相反,加入瘢痕范围导致全因死亡的显著重新分类改善为25.5%(95%CI,11.7%至41.0%),心源性死亡为27.0%(95%CI,11.6%至45.2%),SCD为40.6%(95%CI,10.5%至71.8%)。

结论

心肌瘢痕和LVEF都是非缺血性心肌病患者全因死亡和心源性死亡的风险标志物。然而,虽然心肌瘢痕对SCD风险分层具有强大且增量的预后价值,但LVEF相对于临床指标并无增量预后价值。瘢痕评估应纳入植入式心律转复除颤器一级预防的患者选择标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验