Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of Preventive Medicine and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Sep;4(9):1200-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
This study sought to investigate the association of myocardial scar and ischemia with major arrhythmic events (MAEs) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%.
Although myocardial scar is a known substrate for ventricular arrhythmias, the association of myocardial ischemia with ventricular arrhythmias in stable patients with left ventricular dysfunction is less clear.
A total of 439 consecutive patients (median age, 70 years; 78% male; 55% with implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD]) referred for stress/rest positron emission tomography (PET) and resting LVEF ≤35% were included. Primary outcome was time-to-first MAE defined as sudden cardiac death, resuscitated sudden cardiac death, or appropriate ICD shocks for ventricular tachyarrhythmias ascertained by blinded adjudication of hospital records, Social Security Administration's Death Masterfile, National Death Index, and ICD vendor databases.
Ninety-one MAEs including 20 sudden cardiac deaths occurred in 75 (17%) patients during a median follow-up of 3.2 years. Transmural myocardial scar was strongly associated with MAEs beyond age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, beta-blocker therapy, and resting LVEF (adjusted hazard ratio per 10% increase in scar, 1.48 [95% confidence interval: 1.22 to 1.80]; p < 0.001). However, non transmural scar/hibernation or markers of myocardial ischemia on PET including global or peri-infarct ischemia, coronary flow reserve, and resting or hyperemic myocardial blood flows were not associated with MAEs in univariable or multivariable analysis. These findings remained robust in subgroup analyses of patients with ICD (n = 223), with ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 287), and in patients without revascularization after the PET scan (n = 365).
Myocardial scar but not ischemia was associated with appropriate ICD shocks and sudden cardiac death in patients with LVEF ≤35%. These findings have implications for risk-stratification of patients with left ventricular dysfunction who may benefit from ICD therapy.
本研究旨在探讨心肌瘢痕和缺血与左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤35%的患者主要心律失常事件(MAE)之间的关系。
虽然心肌瘢痕是室性心律失常的已知发生基质,但在左心室功能障碍的稳定患者中,心肌缺血与室性心律失常的关系尚不清楚。
共纳入 439 例连续患者(中位年龄 70 岁;78%为男性;55%植入了植入式心脏复律除颤器 [ICD]),他们接受了应激/静息正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和 LVEF≤35%的静息检查。主要结局是首次 MAE 的时间,定义为通过盲法评估医院记录、社会保障管理局的死亡主文件、国家死亡索引和 ICD 供应商数据库确定的心脏骤停、复苏性心脏骤停或适当的 ICD 电击治疗的室性心动过速/颤动。
在中位随访 3.2 年期间,75 例(17%)患者发生了 91 次 MAE,包括 20 例心脏骤停。透壁性心肌瘢痕与 MAE 显著相关,独立于年龄、性别、心血管危险因素、β受体阻滞剂治疗和静息 LVEF(每增加 10%瘢痕的调整后的危险比,1.48[95%置信区间:1.22 至 1.80];p<0.001)。然而,PET 上的非透壁性瘢痕/冬眠或心肌缺血标志物,包括整体或梗死周边缺血、冠状动脉血流储备、静息或充血性心肌血流,在单变量或多变量分析中均与 MAE 无关。这些发现仍然在具有 ICD(n=223)、缺血性心肌病(n=287)和 PET 扫描后无血运重建的患者(n=365)的亚组分析中具有稳健性。
在 LVEF≤35%的患者中,心肌瘢痕而非缺血与适当的 ICD 电击和心脏骤停有关。这些发现对左心室功能障碍患者的风险分层具有影响,这些患者可能受益于 ICD 治疗。