Kimberlee Flike, MSN, UMass Boston, College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
Teri Aronowitz, PhD, APRN, FNP-BC, FAAN, UMass Boston, College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2022 Mar;28(2):128-153. doi: 10.1177/1078390320985286. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
An emerging category of morbidity in research among people experiencing homelessness (PEH) is quality of life (QoL). The Commission on Social Determinants of Health (CSDH) framework was used to explain the relationship between the resulting factors and their impact on QoL among PEH.
The purpose of this systematic mixed studies review was to explore the factors that are associated with QoL among homeless individuals.
A systematic mixed studies review was conducted using CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, and SocIndex databases. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies were included and synthesized employing results-based convergent synthesis design.
The initial search resulted in 757 studies with 55 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis revealed themes influencing QoL among PEH categorized by the CSDH determinants of structural, social cohesion and social capital, and intermediary determinants. Among these themes, higher social status, strong relationships, better reported physical and mental health, and a positive life outlook were associated with increased QoL. Social isolation, substance use, poorer life outlook, increased years spent homeless, and perceived quality of housing were associated with decreased QoL. Age, sex, and housing programs revealed inconsistent results on QoL.
While the factors presented in this review indicate some consistent relationships with QoL in PEH, this review has shown QoL among this population is complex and multifactorial. Future research should focus on relationships between the CSDH determinants, particularly the psychosocial factors and the QoL priorities defined by PEH, and how they may influence QoL among PEH.
在无家可归者(PEH)研究中,一个新兴的发病率类别是生活质量(QoL)。使用卫生保健社会决定因素委员会(CSDH)框架来解释由此产生的因素及其对 PEH 人群生活质量的影响。
本系统混合研究综述的目的是探讨与无家可归者个体生活质量相关的因素。
使用 CINAHL、Medline、PubMed 和 SocIndex 数据库进行系统混合研究综述。纳入了定量、定性和混合方法研究,并采用基于结果的聚合综合设计进行综合。
最初的搜索产生了 757 项研究,其中 55 项符合纳入标准。主题分析揭示了影响 PEH 人群生活质量的主题,这些主题可分为 CSDH 的结构决定因素、社会凝聚力和社会资本以及中介决定因素。在这些主题中,较高的社会地位、牢固的关系、较好的身心健康报告以及积极的生活态度与较高的生活质量相关。社会隔离、物质使用、较差的生活态度、无家可归时间增加以及住房质量感知与较低的生活质量相关。年龄、性别和住房计划在生活质量方面的结果不一致。
尽管本综述中提出的因素表明与 PEH 人群生活质量存在一些一致的关系,但本综述表明,该人群的生活质量是复杂和多因素的。未来的研究应重点关注 CSDH 决定因素之间的关系,特别是心理社会因素和 PEH 定义的生活质量重点,以及它们如何影响 PEH 人群的生活质量。