Suppr超能文献

三维与二维内镜甲状腺切除术治疗良恶性病变的比较:荟萃分析。

Comparison between 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic thyroidectomy for benign and malignant lesions: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Guangxi Clinical Research Center for Colorectal Cancer, Guangxi Cancer Hospital and Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Autonomous Region, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02134-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of 3-dimensional (3D) endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) has been increasing, but its feasibility and safety have not been well documented for thyroidectomy. Hence, to systematically investigate the comparative outcomes during 3D-ET and 2-dimensional (2D) ET for benign and malignant lesions, we conducted this meta-analysis.

METHODS

Based on the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic database search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Wanfang databases was performed. The eligible studies were published in English and Chinese up to October 2020. The major endpoints evaluated were procedure time, blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospitalization, postoperative complications, total number of lymph node dissections (LNDs), and total cost.

RESULTS

A total of 15 relevant studies including 1190 patients (583 for 3D-ET and 607 for 2D-ET) compared the application of 3D and 2D laparoscopic systems in thyroid surgery, of which 8 were endoscopic benign thyroidectomy (EBT) and 7 were endoscopic malignant thyroidectomy (EMT). Our meta-analysis indicated that 3D-ET generally had advantages over 2D-ET in terms of procedure time (P = 0.000), blood loss (P = 0.000), postoperative drainage (P = 0.000), postoperative complications (P = 0.000), and LNDs (P = 0.006). However, there were no significant differences between the two systems in terms of total cost (P = 0.245) or postoperative hospitalization (P = 0.068). Subgroup analysis showed consistency of the overall outcomes in each subset, but a shorter postoperative hospitalization in 3D-EBT was revealed.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to 2D-ET, 3D endoscopic thyroidectomy is an efficient, safe, and reliable method with better depth perception and stereoscopic vision, and an equally satisfactory outcome. More clinical RCTs with long-term follow-up are required to reproduce these promising results.

摘要

背景

三维(3D)内镜甲状腺切除术(ET)的应用越来越多,但对于甲状腺切除术,其可行性和安全性尚未得到很好的记录。因此,为了系统地研究 3D-ET 和 2 维(2D)ET 治疗良性和恶性病变的对比结果,我们进行了这项荟萃分析。

方法

根据 PRISMA 指南,对 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)和中国万方数据库进行了系统的数据库检索。纳入的研究发表于 2020 年 10 月之前的英文和中文文献。评估的主要终点是手术时间、出血量、术后引流、术后住院时间、术后并发症、总淋巴结清扫(LNDs)数量和总费用。

结果

共纳入 15 项相关研究,包括 1190 例患者(3D-ET 组 583 例,2D-ET 组 607 例),比较了 3D 和 2D 腹腔镜系统在甲状腺手术中的应用,其中 8 项为内镜良性甲状腺切除术(EBT),7 项为内镜恶性甲状腺切除术(EMT)。荟萃分析结果表明,3D-ET 在手术时间(P = 0.000)、出血量(P = 0.000)、术后引流(P = 0.000)、术后并发症(P = 0.000)和 LNDs 数量(P = 0.006)方面普遍优于 2D-ET。但两种系统在总费用(P = 0.245)或术后住院时间(P = 0.068)方面无显著差异。亚组分析显示,各亚组的总体结果一致,但 3D-EBT 的术后住院时间更短。

结论

与 2D-ET 相比,3D 内镜甲状腺切除术是一种高效、安全、可靠的方法,具有更好的深度感知和立体视觉,且结果同样令人满意。需要更多具有长期随访的临床 RCT 来重现这些有前景的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/309c/7819346/b621432afa13/12957_2021_2134_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验